World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oliver Findl

Oliver Findl

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
20570
World Ranking
14790
National Ranking
76

Oliver Findl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Findl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Oliver Findl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Findl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Oliver Findl is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with an emphasis on Ophthalmology. Across their body of work, they have contributed extensively to various subfields including Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Major research topics covered by Oliver Findl include:

  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Corneal Surgery and Disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Glaucoma and Retinal Disorders
  • Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on clinical and technological aspects of ophthalmic research. Notable papers include:

  • Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial (2023, The Lancet)
  • Sources of Error in Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (2020, Journal of Refractive Surgery)
  • Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy following Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination (2021, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation)
  • Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices (2020, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery)
  • Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery (2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)

Oliver Findl has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting ongoing partnerships in ophthalmic research. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Nino Hirnschall
  • Manuel Ruiß
  • Christoph Leisser
  • Andreas Schlatter
  • Martin Kronschläger

Their work has been published in a variety of specialized journals, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
  • Spektrum der Augenheilkunde
  • Ophthalmic Research
  • Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology

This combination of research topics, publication venues, and collaborations situates Oliver Findl within a focused domain of ophthalmological research centered on intraocular devices, retinal and corneal disorders, and vision impairment studies, supported by imaging and epidemiological methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

    Wolfgang Drexler;Harald Sattmann;Boris Hermann;Tony H. Ko

  • Partial Coherence Interferometry: A Novel Approach to Biometry in Cataract Surgery

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Rupert Menapace;Georg Rainer

  • Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry.

    Oliver Findl;Wolfgang Drexler;Rupert Menapace;Harald Heinzl

  • Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.

    Wolf Buehl;Danijela Stojanac;Stefan Sacu;Wolfgang Drexler

  • Imaging of polarization properties of human retina in vivo with phase resolved transversal PS-OCT

    Michael Pircher;Erich Götzinger;Rainer Leitgeb;Harald Sattmann

  • The capsular tension ring: designs, applications, and techniques.

    Rupert Menapace;Oliver Findl;Michael Georgopoulos;Georg Rainer

  • Investigation of Dispersion Effects in Ocular Media by Multiple Wavelength Partial Coherence Interferometry

    Wolfgang Drexler;Christoph K. Hitzenberger;Angela Baumgartner;Oliver Findl

  • Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

    Oliver Findl;Wolf Buehl;Peter Bauer;Thomas Sycha

  • Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.

    Oliver Findl;Katharina Kriechbaum;Stefan Sacu;Barbara Kiss

  • Eye Elongation during Accommodation in Humans: Differences between Emmetropes and Myopes

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Leopold Schmetterer;Christoph K. Hitzenberger

  • Evaluation of the Zeiss retinal vessel analyser.

    Kaija Polak;Guido Dorner;Barbara Kiss;Elzbieta Polska

  • Ray tracing for intraocular lens calculation.

    Paul-Rolf Preussner;Jochen Wahl;Hedro Lahdo;Burkhard Dick

  • Comparison of 4 methods for quantifying posterior capsule opacification

    Oliver Findl;Wolf Buehl;Rupert Menapace;Michael Georgopoulos

  • Dual-beam optical coherence tomography: signal identification for ophthalmologic diagnosis

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Rupert Menapace;Andreas Kruger

  • Prediction of pseudophakic capsular bag diameter based on biometric variables.

    Clemens Vass;Rupert Menapace;Karin Schmetterer;Oliver Findl

  • Human macula investigated in vivo with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography

    Michael Pircher;Erich Götzinger;Oliver Findl;Stephan Michels

  • Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction

    Oliver Findl;Barbara Kiss;Vanessa Petternel;Rupert Menapace

  • High precision biometry of pseudophakic eyes using partial coherence interferometry

    Oliver Findl;Wolfgang Drexler;Rupert Menapace;Christoph K. Hitzenberger

  • Assessment of optic disk blood flow in patients with open-angle glaucoma

    Oliver Findl;Georg Rainer;Susanne Dallinger;Guido Dorner

  • Effect of an acrylic intraocular lens with a sharp posterior optic edge on posterior capsule opacification

    Wolf Buehl;Rupert Menapace;Stefan Sacu;Katharina Kriechbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Leopold Schmetterer
Leopold Schmetterer Nanyang Technological University
Christoph K. Hitzenberger
Christoph K. Hitzenberger Medical University of Vienna
Hans-Georg Eichler
Hans-Georg Eichler European Medicines Agency
Axel Pinz
Axel Pinz Graz University of Technology
Pablo Artal
Pablo Artal University of Murcia
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Medical University of Vienna
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Christoph Feichtenhofer
Christoph Feichtenhofer Meta Platforms, Inc.
Bernd Jilma
Bernd Jilma Medical University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens many alternative pathways for those interested in healthcare. If you’re considering an online option, there are online MSN programs for non nurses that offer a direct route into advanced nursing roles, even if you don’t have previous nursing experience.

For students who want to enter the field quickly, it may be helpful to look at whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to find programs with higher acceptance rates and more flexible requirements. Some schools even make it simpler by being included among the nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi entrance exams.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are numerous accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid that provide training completely online, allowing for a flexible and affordable entry into the industry.

These online options can make launching or advancing your healthcare career more accessible and tailored to your unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Findl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles