World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Oliver Findl

Oliver Findl

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14789 13922 76 71 405 20570

Oliver Findl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Findl between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Findl published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 15.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2005. 34 of the 470 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2005. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 26 publications 2005: 34 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 32 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 25 publications 2025: 9 publications
1995 2025

470 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Findl: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 4
1997 12
1998 14
1999 12
2000 15
2001 17
2002 11
2003 20
2004 26
2005 34
2006 15
2007 15
2008 11
2009 7
2010 11
2011 10
2012 10
2013 11
2014 11
2015 14
2016 12
2017 16
2018 14
2019 13
2020 23
2021 32
2022 22
2023 23
2024 25
2025 9
Total 470
Download as CSV

Oliver Findl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Findl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 405
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Findl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Findl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Oliver Findl is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with an emphasis on Ophthalmology. Across their body of work, they have contributed extensively to various subfields including Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and General Health Professions.

Major research topics covered by Oliver Findl include:

  • Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Corneal Surgery and Disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Glaucoma and Retinal Disorders
  • Retinal and Macular Surgery
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on clinical and technological aspects of ophthalmic research. Notable papers include:

  • Efficacy and safety of avacincaptad pegol in patients with geographic atrophy (GATHER2): 12-month results from a randomised, double-masked, phase 3 trial (2023, The Lancet)
  • Sources of Error in Toric Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (2020, Journal of Refractive Surgery)
  • Acute Macular Neuroretinopathy following Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination (2021, Ocular Immunology and Inflammation)
  • Comparison of 2 swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry devices (2020, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery)
  • Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery (2021, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)

Oliver Findl has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, reflecting ongoing partnerships in ophthalmic research. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Nino Hirnschall
  • Manuel Ruiß
  • Christoph Leisser
  • Andreas Schlatter
  • Martin Kronschläger

Their work has been published in a variety of specialized journals, with the highest number of publications appearing in:

  • Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
  • Spektrum der Augenheilkunde
  • Ophthalmic Research
  • Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology

This combination of research topics, publication venues, and collaborations situates Oliver Findl within a focused domain of ophthalmological research centered on intraocular devices, retinal and corneal disorders, and vision impairment studies, supported by imaging and epidemiological methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Enhanced visualization of macular pathology with the use of ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

    Wolfgang Drexler;Harald Sattmann;Boris Hermann;Tony H. Ko

  • Partial Coherence Interferometry: A Novel Approach to Biometry in Cataract Surgery

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Rupert Menapace;Georg Rainer

  • Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry.

    Oliver Findl;Wolfgang Drexler;Rupert Menapace;Harald Heinzl

  • Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.

    Wolf Buehl;Danijela Stojanac;Stefan Sacu;Wolfgang Drexler

  • Imaging of polarization properties of human retina in vivo with phase resolved transversal PS-OCT

    Michael Pircher;Erich Götzinger;Rainer Leitgeb;Harald Sattmann

  • The capsular tension ring: designs, applications, and techniques.

    Rupert Menapace;Oliver Findl;Michael Georgopoulos;Georg Rainer

  • Investigation of Dispersion Effects in Ocular Media by Multiple Wavelength Partial Coherence Interferometry

    Wolfgang Drexler;Christoph K. Hitzenberger;Angela Baumgartner;Oliver Findl

  • Interventions for preventing posterior capsule opacification

    Oliver Findl;Wolf Buehl;Peter Bauer;Thomas Sycha

  • Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery.

    Oliver Findl;Katharina Kriechbaum;Stefan Sacu;Barbara Kiss

  • Eye Elongation during Accommodation in Humans: Differences between Emmetropes and Myopes

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Leopold Schmetterer;Christoph K. Hitzenberger

  • Evaluation of the Zeiss retinal vessel analyser.

    Kaija Polak;Guido Dorner;Barbara Kiss;Elzbieta Polska

  • Ray tracing for intraocular lens calculation.

    Paul-Rolf Preussner;Jochen Wahl;Hedro Lahdo;Burkhard Dick

  • Comparison of 4 methods for quantifying posterior capsule opacification

    Oliver Findl;Wolf Buehl;Rupert Menapace;Michael Georgopoulos

  • Dual-beam optical coherence tomography: signal identification for ophthalmologic diagnosis

    Wolfgang Drexler;Oliver Findl;Rupert Menapace;Andreas Kruger

  • Prediction of pseudophakic capsular bag diameter based on biometric variables.

    Clemens Vass;Rupert Menapace;Karin Schmetterer;Oliver Findl

  • Human macula investigated in vivo with polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography

    Michael Pircher;Erich Götzinger;Oliver Findl;Stephan Michels

  • Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction

    Oliver Findl;Barbara Kiss;Vanessa Petternel;Rupert Menapace

  • High precision biometry of pseudophakic eyes using partial coherence interferometry

    Oliver Findl;Wolfgang Drexler;Rupert Menapace;Christoph K. Hitzenberger

  • Assessment of optic disk blood flow in patients with open-angle glaucoma

    Oliver Findl;Georg Rainer;Susanne Dallinger;Guido Dorner

  • Effect of an acrylic intraocular lens with a sharp posterior optic edge on posterior capsule opacification

    Wolf Buehl;Rupert Menapace;Stefan Sacu;Katharina Kriechbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

Leopold Schmetterer
Leopold Schmetterer Nanyang Technological University
Christoph K. Hitzenberger
Christoph K. Hitzenberger Medical University of Vienna
Hans-Georg Eichler
Hans-Georg Eichler European Medicines Agency
Axel Pinz
Axel Pinz Graz University of Technology
Pablo Artal
Pablo Artal University of Murcia
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth Medical University of Vienna
Nassir Navab
Nassir Navab Technical University of Munich
Christoph Feichtenhofer
Christoph Feichtenhofer Meta Platforms, Inc.
Bernd Jilma
Bernd Jilma Medical University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens many alternative pathways for those interested in healthcare. If you’re considering an online option, there are online MSN programs for non nurses that offer a direct route into advanced nursing roles, even if you don’t have previous nursing experience.

For students who want to enter the field quickly, it may be helpful to look at whats the easiest nursing program to get into? to find programs with higher acceptance rates and more flexible requirements. Some schools even make it simpler by being included among the nursing schools that don't require teas or hesi entrance exams.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care. If you’re interested in the administrative side of healthcare, there are numerous accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid that provide training completely online, allowing for a flexible and affordable entry into the industry.

These online options can make launching or advancing your healthcare career more accessible and tailored to your unique needs.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Findl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles