World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
Germany
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 78 1712 1628 126 120 256 19726

Ingo Schubert publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ingo Schubert between 1973 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ingo Schubert published across 54 years, from 1973 to 2026, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2000. 12 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2000. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 11 publications 1996: 11 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 12 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 17 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 5 publications
1973 2026

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ingo Schubert: publications per year, 1973 to 2026
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 2
1977 2
1978 3
1979 4
1980 3
1981 3
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 5
1986 6
1987 2
1988 3
1989 3
1990 7
1991 2
1992 2
1993 6
1994 10
1995 11
1996 11
1997 6
1998 12
1999 1
2000 17
2001 9
2002 9
2003 10
2004 8
2005 9
2006 10
2007 11
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 13
2012 4
2013 9
2014 5
2015 6
2016 5
2017 6
2018 3
2019 1
2020 5
2021 3
2022 4
2023 4
2024 6
2025 7
2026 5
Total 291
Download as CSV

Ingo Schubert publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Schubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 255–264 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 256 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92 256
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Ingo Schubert D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ingo Schubert sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127 78
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Ingo Schubert is affiliated with the Leibniz Association in Germany. Their research spans multiple disciplines within environmental and biological sciences, with a focus on areas such as constructed wetlands, coastal wetland ecosystems, and peatlands ecology. Schubert's work incorporates various facets of plant science, molecular biology, and industrial engineering, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to environmental and biological systems.

The scientist's main fields of study include Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these fields, Schubert has contributed notably to subfields such as Ecology, Plant Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Molecular Biology, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Key topics explored in Schubert's research cover Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Chromosomal and Genetic Variations, Plant Diversity and Evolution, Microtubule and Mitosis Dynamics, and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis.

Frequent coauthors in Schubert's collaborative research efforts include Veit Schubert, Jörg Fuchs, Hoang Thi Nhu Phuong, Eric Lam, and Anton Stepanenko. These collaborations highlight a network of researchers contributing to intersecting topics within biological and environmental sciences.

Schubert has published regularly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Plants, Current Biology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, and the Journal of Experimental Botany. These journals emphasize the scientist's involvement in disseminating findings across plant science and molecular biology disciplines.

Recent publications include:

  • Return of the Lemnaceae: duckweed as a model plant system in the genomics and postgenomics era, 2021, The Plant Cell
  • The giant diploid faba genome unlocks variation in a global protein crop, 2023, Nature
  • Genomes of the Venus Flytrap and Close Relatives Unveil the Roots of Plant Carnivory, 2020, Current Biology
  • A taxonomic revision of Lemna sect. Uninerves (Lemnaceae), 2020, Taxon
  • Super-Resolution Microscopy Reveals Diversity of Plant Centromere Architecture, 2020, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Chromosome triplication found across the tribe Brassiceae

    Martin A. Lysak;Marcus A. Koch;Ales Pecinka;Ingo Schubert

  • DNA methylation controls histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and heterochromatin assembly in Arabidopsis

    Wim J.J. Soppe;Zuzana Jasencakova;Andreas Houben;Tetsuji Kakutani

  • Interphase chromosomes in Arabidopsis are organized as well defined chromocenters from which euchromatin loops emanate

    Paul Fransz;J. Hans de Jong;Martin Lysak;Monica Ruffini Castiglione

  • Mechanisms of chromosome number reduction in Arabidopsis thaliana and related Brassicaceae species

    Martin A. Lysak;Alexandre Berr;Ales Pecinka;Renate Schmidt

  • An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots

    Fritz Matzk;Armin Meister;Ingo Schubert

  • Chromosomal histone modification patterns--from conservation to diversity.

    Jörg Fuchs;Dmitri Demidov;Andreas Houben;Ingo Schubert

  • In situ hybridization confirms jumping nucleolus organizing regions in Allium

    I. Schubert;U. Wobus

  • Dual histone H3 methylation marks at lysines 9 and 27 required for interaction with CHROMOMETHYLASE3

    Anders M Lindroth;David Shultis;Zuzana Jasencakova;Jörg Fuchs

  • Dimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 is a critical mark for DNA methylation and gene silencing in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    James P. Jackson;Lianna Johnson;Zuzana Jasencakova;Xing Zhang

  • The Spirodela polyrhiza genome reveals insights into its neotenous reduction fast growth and aquatic lifestyle

    W. Wang;G. Haberer;H. Gundlach;C. Gläßer

  • Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints.

    Ingo Schubert;Martin A. Lysak

  • Telomere sequence localization and karyotype evolution in higher plants

    J. Fuchs;A. Brandes;I. Schubert

  • A Ty3/gypsy retrotransposon-like sequence localizes to the centromeric regions of cereal chromosomes.

    Gernot G. Presting;Ludmilla Malysheva;Jörg Fuchs;Ingo Schubert

  • Loading of Arabidopsis Centromeric Histone CENH3 Occurs Mainly during G2 and Requires the Presence of the Histone Fold Domain

    Inna Lermontova;Veit Schubert;Joerg Fuchs;Sabina Klatte

  • Chromosome territory arrangement and homologous pairing in nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana are predominantly random except for NOR-bearing chromosomes

    Ales Pecinka;Veit Schubert;Armin Meister;Gregor Kreth

  • Histone H4 Acetylation of Euchromatin and Heterochromatin Is Cell Cycle Dependent and Correlated with Replication Rather Than with Transcription

    Zuzana Jasencakova;Armin Meister;Joachim Walter;Bryan M. Turner

  • Stable barley chromosomes without centromeric repeats

    S. Nasuda;S. Hudakova;I. Schubert;A. Houben

  • Chromosome painting in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Martin A Lysak;Paul F Fransz;Hoda B. M Ali;Ingo Schubert

  • DNA damage and repair in Arabidopsis thaliana as measured by the comet assay after treatment with different classes of genotoxins.

    Merten Menke;I-Peng Chen;Karel J Angelis;Ingo Schubert

  • How do Alliaceae stabilize their chromosome ends in the absence of TTTAGGG sequences

    Uta Pich;Jörg Fuchs;Ingo Schubert

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörg Fuchs
Jörg Fuchs Leibniz Association
Andreas Houben
Andreas Houben Leibniz Association
Martin A. Lysak
Martin A. Lysak Masaryk University
Paul Fransz
Paul Fransz University of Amsterdam
Jiří Macas
Jiří Macas Czech Academy of Sciences
Holger Puchta
Holger Puchta Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jochen Kumlehn
Jochen Kumlehn Leibniz Association
Jiri Macas
Jiri Macas Czech Academy of Sciences
Helmut Bäumlein
Helmut Bäumlein Leibniz Association
Steven E. Jacobsen
Steven E. Jacobsen University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in genetics but also exploring flexible education options, online learning can provide many tailored pathways. Some students start with specialized healthcare administration programs. For example, medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid offer practical entry-points into the medical field without extensive prior science backgrounds.

For those eager to fast-track their studies and jumpstart their careers, consider accelerated career programs. These programs are designed to help you graduate sooner, blending in-demand skills with concentrated coursework.

If flexibility is your top priority, explore the best self paced online college options. With self-paced formats, you can balance genetics studies with work, internships, or personal commitments at your own speed.

Finally, to minimize upfront costs, review the list of free application online colleges. Applying to these schools can save money as you explore your education in genetics and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Ingo Schubert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles