World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
21131
World Ranking
17215
National Ranking
8626

Norbert Gleicher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 694 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Norbert Gleicher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Norbert Gleicher is affiliated with the Center for Human Reproduction in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of reproductive medicine and related disciplines.

Their research spans across multiple fields of study, primarily within medicine, with a focus on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, reproductive medicine, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Additional interests include molecular biology and genetics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Renal and related cancers

Norbert Gleicher has published in several peer-reviewed journals frequently, with notable venues being:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Human Reproduction
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
  • Human Reproduction Open

Among the recent papers published are:

  • Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids, 2021, Nature Cell Biology
  • Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy - a Castle Built on Sand, 2021, Trends in Molecular Medicine
  • IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study, 2022, Human Reproduction
  • The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies, 2022, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A, 2020, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Norbert Gleicher include:

  • David H. Barad
  • Pasquale Patrizio
  • Emanuela Molinari
  • Sarah K. Darmon
  • David F. Albertini

Best Publications

  • Is endornetriosis an autoimmune disease

    Norbert Gleicher;Albert El-Roeiy;Edmond Confino;Jan Friberg

  • A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

    Stephen A. Myers;Norbert Gleicher

  • Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)

    Norbert Gleicher;David H Barad

  • Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Vidali;David H. Barad

  • Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on oocyte and embryo yields, embryo grade and cell number in IVF.

    David Barad;Norbert Gleicher

  • Is endometriosis an autoimmune disease

    N Gleicher;A El-Roeiy;E Confino;J Friberg

  • Update on the use of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation among women with diminished ovarian function.

    David Barad;Hyama Brill;Norbert Gleicher

  • Eisenmenger's syndrome and pregnancy☆

    N. Gleicher;J. Midwall;D. Hochberger;H. Jaffin

  • Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H Barad

  • Reproductive failure because of autoantibodies: Unexplained infertility and pregnancy wastage

    N Gleicher;A El-Roeiy;E Confino;J Friberg

  • Increased oocyte production after treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone.

    David H. Barad;Norbert Gleicher

  • The role of androgens in follicle maturation and ovulation induction: friend or foe of infertility treatment?

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H Barad

  • The red-cell immune system.

    Israel Siegel;Tian Lin Liu;Norbert Gleicher

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) defines, independent of age, low versus good live-birth chances in women with severely diminished ovarian reserve

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H. Barad

  • The reproductive autoimmune failure syndrome.

    Norbert Gleicher;Norbert Gleicher;Albert El-Roeiy;Albert El-Roeiy

  • Miscarriage rates after dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a case control study

    Norbert Gleicher;Eddy Ryan;Andrea Weghofer;Sonia Blanco-Mejia

  • COMPARING ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE (AMH) AND FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE (FSH) AS PREDICTORS OF OVARIAN FUNCTION

    David H. Barad;Andrea Weghofer;Norbert Gleicher

  • EGG RETRIEVAL FOR IN VITRO FERTILISATION BY SONOGRAPHICALLY CONTROLLED VAGINAL CULDOCENTESIS

    Norbert Gleicher;Jan Friberg;Neil Fullan;RobertV. Giglia

  • The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

    Karen Sermon;Antonio Capalbo;Jacques Cohen;Edith Coonen

  • Correlation between peripheral blood and follicular fluid autoantibodies and impact on in vitro fertilization

    Albert El-Roeiy;Norbert Gleicher;Jan Friberg;Edmond Confino

Frequent Co-Authors

Kutluk Oktay
Kutluk Oktay Yale University
Uri Elkayam
Uri Elkayam University of Southern California
Santiago Munné
Santiago Munné Saint Barnabas Medical Center
Jacques Cohen
Jacques Cohen Reprogenetics
David F. Albertini
David F. Albertini University of Kansas
Philip R. Greipp
Philip R. Greipp Mayo Clinic
James F. Holland
James F. Holland Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Salvatore Mancuso
Salvatore Mancuso Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Leslie J. DeGroot
Leslie J. DeGroot University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine in the USA opens a wide range of online degree and certification options beyond the traditional MD path. Many students choose online health administration programs to develop business and leadership skills needed for hospital or clinic management roles. These programs are ideal for those interested in the operational side of healthcare.

Nurses who aim to advance their clinical careers can benefit from asn to fnp programs, which offer bridge programs from an associate to a master’s degree, allowing RNs to become Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) efficiently. This pathway supports greater responsibility and higher earning potential.

Nutrition is another fast-growing field in healthcare. Prospective practitioners may consider the best online nutrition programs to enter roles like registered dietitian or nutritionist. Such degrees combine science-based curricula with flexibility for remote learners.

For leadership aspirants, accredited programs like cahme accredited online mha programs ensure quality education in healthcare administration. These degrees are highly respected and can accelerate career progress in hospital or health system management.

Best Scientists Citing Norbert Gleicher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles