World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17214 16177 8625 7971 694 21131

Norbert Gleicher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Norbert Gleicher between 1977 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Norbert Gleicher published across 50 years, from 1977 to 2026, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 43 publications in 2013. 10 of the 724 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 43. Peak 43 publications in 2013. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 7 publications 1980: 6 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 9 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 14 publications 1985: 33 publications 1986: 35 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 12 publications 1990: 11 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 27 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 2 publications
1977 2026

724 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Norbert Gleicher: publications per year, 1977 to 2026
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 2
1979 7
1980 6
1981 12
1982 9
1983 7
1984 14
1985 33
1986 35
1987 11
1988 15
1989 12
1990 11
1991 7
1992 13
1993 4
1994 8
1995 12
1996 6
1997 7
1998 8
1999 5
2000 6
2001 8
2002 6
2003 6
2004 3
2005 8
2006 17
2007 27
2008 22
2009 28
2010 24
2011 22
2012 16
2013 43
2014 27
2015 25
2016 37
2017 26
2018 30
2019 11
2020 20
2021 26
2022 16
2023 8
2024 7
2025 8
2026 2
Total 724
Download as CSV

Norbert Gleicher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 694 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 694
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Norbert Gleicher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Norbert Gleicher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Norbert Gleicher is affiliated with the Center for Human Reproduction in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of reproductive medicine and related disciplines.

Their research spans across multiple fields of study, primarily within medicine, with a focus on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, reproductive medicine, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Additional interests include molecular biology and genetics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Renal and related cancers

Norbert Gleicher has published in several peer-reviewed journals frequently, with notable venues being:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Human Reproduction
  • Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
  • Human Reproduction Open

Among the recent papers published are:

  • Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids, 2021, Nature Cell Biology
  • Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy - a Castle Built on Sand, 2021, Trends in Molecular Medicine
  • IVF outcomes of embryos with abnormal PGT-A biopsy previously refused transfer: a prospective cohort study, 2022, Human Reproduction
  • The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies, 2022, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A, 2020, Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Norbert Gleicher include:

  • David H. Barad
  • Pasquale Patrizio
  • Emanuela Molinari
  • Sarah K. Darmon
  • David F. Albertini

Best Publications

  • Is endornetriosis an autoimmune disease

    Norbert Gleicher;Albert El-Roeiy;Edmond Confino;Jan Friberg

  • A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.

    Stephen A. Myers;Norbert Gleicher

  • Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR)

    Norbert Gleicher;David H Barad

  • Successful treatment of unresponsive thin endometrium

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Vidali;David H. Barad

  • Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on oocyte and embryo yields, embryo grade and cell number in IVF.

    David Barad;Norbert Gleicher

  • Is endometriosis an autoimmune disease

    N Gleicher;A El-Roeiy;E Confino;J Friberg

  • Update on the use of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation among women with diminished ovarian function.

    David Barad;Hyama Brill;Norbert Gleicher

  • Eisenmenger's syndrome and pregnancy☆

    N. Gleicher;J. Midwall;D. Hochberger;H. Jaffin

  • Defining ovarian reserve to better understand ovarian aging

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H Barad

  • Reproductive failure because of autoantibodies: Unexplained infertility and pregnancy wastage

    N Gleicher;A El-Roeiy;E Confino;J Friberg

  • Increased oocyte production after treatment with dehydroepiandrosterone.

    David H. Barad;Norbert Gleicher

  • The role of androgens in follicle maturation and ovulation induction: friend or foe of infertility treatment?

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H Barad

  • The red-cell immune system.

    Israel Siegel;Tian Lin Liu;Norbert Gleicher

  • Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) defines, independent of age, low versus good live-birth chances in women with severely diminished ovarian reserve

    Norbert Gleicher;Andrea Weghofer;David H. Barad

  • The reproductive autoimmune failure syndrome.

    Norbert Gleicher;Norbert Gleicher;Albert El-Roeiy;Albert El-Roeiy

  • Miscarriage rates after dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation in women with diminished ovarian reserve: a case control study

    Norbert Gleicher;Eddy Ryan;Andrea Weghofer;Sonia Blanco-Mejia

  • COMPARING ANTI-MULLERIAN HORMONE (AMH) AND FOLLICLE-STIMULATING HORMONE (FSH) AS PREDICTORS OF OVARIAN FUNCTION

    David H. Barad;Andrea Weghofer;Norbert Gleicher

  • EGG RETRIEVAL FOR IN VITRO FERTILISATION BY SONOGRAPHICALLY CONTROLLED VAGINAL CULDOCENTESIS

    Norbert Gleicher;Jan Friberg;Neil Fullan;RobertV. Giglia

  • The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

    Karen Sermon;Antonio Capalbo;Jacques Cohen;Edith Coonen

  • Correlation between peripheral blood and follicular fluid autoantibodies and impact on in vitro fertilization

    Albert El-Roeiy;Norbert Gleicher;Jan Friberg;Edmond Confino

Frequent Co-Authors

Kutluk Oktay
Kutluk Oktay Yale University
Uri Elkayam
Uri Elkayam University of Southern California
Santiago Munné
Santiago Munné Saint Barnabas Medical Center
Jacques Cohen
Jacques Cohen Reprogenetics
David F. Albertini
David F. Albertini University of Kansas
Philip R. Greipp
Philip R. Greipp Mayo Clinic
James F. Holland
James F. Holland Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Salvatore Mancuso
Salvatore Mancuso Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Leslie J. DeGroot
Leslie J. DeGroot University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine in the USA opens a wide range of online degree and certification options beyond the traditional MD path. Many students choose online health administration programs to develop business and leadership skills needed for hospital or clinic management roles. These programs are ideal for those interested in the operational side of healthcare.

Nurses who aim to advance their clinical careers can benefit from asn to fnp programs, which offer bridge programs from an associate to a master’s degree, allowing RNs to become Family Nurse Practitioners (FNPs) efficiently. This pathway supports greater responsibility and higher earning potential.

Nutrition is another fast-growing field in healthcare. Prospective practitioners may consider the best online nutrition programs to enter roles like registered dietitian or nutritionist. Such degrees combine science-based curricula with flexibility for remote learners.

For leadership aspirants, accredited programs like cahme accredited online mha programs ensure quality education in healthcare administration. These degrees are highly respected and can accelerate career progress in hospital or health system management.

Best Scientists Citing Norbert Gleicher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles