World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David F. Albertini

David F. Albertini

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
76
Citations
20089
World Ranking
5059
National Ranking
2424

David F. Albertini publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Albertini sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 405 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David F. Albertini D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Albertini sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Albertini is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States and contributes extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on reproductive medicine and related disciplines. Their research encompasses a range of topics within reproductive biology and fertility, prenatal screening and diagnostics, and assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy. Additional areas of study include ovarian function and disorders, reproductive health and technologies, and the synthesis and properties of biodegradable polymers.

Albertini's work has appeared in several publication venues, reflecting a diverse and interdisciplinary approach. Frequent venues include the Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Fertility and Sterility, Human Reproduction, Human Reproduction Open, and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

Among recent publications associated with this researcher are:

  • The subcortical maternal complex: emerging roles and novel perspectives (2021), Molecular Human Reproduction
  • The changing world of IVF: the pros and cons of new business models offering assisted reproductive technologies (2022), Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
  • The 2019 PGDIS position statement on transfer of mosaic embryos within a context of new information on PGT-A (2020), Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
  • Preliminary report of intraovarian injections of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in extremely poor prognosis patients with only oocyte donation as alternative: a prospective cohort study (2022), Human Reproduction Open
  • The ovarian sensitivity index is predictive of live birth chances after IVF in infertile patients (2020), Human Reproduction Open

Albertini collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Norbert Gleicher, David H. Barad, Sarah K. Darmon, Emanuela Molinari, and Pasquale Patrizio. These coauthorships indicate active engagement in interdisciplinary and collaborative research efforts.

Their subfields of study further illustrate a broad interdisciplinary span, encompassing Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health; and Molecular Biology, alongside core work in reproductive medicine and related topics.

Best Publications

  • Growth differentiation factor-9 is required during early ovarian folliculogenesis

    Dong J;Albertini Df;Nishimori K;Kumar Tr

  • Gap junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary.

    E Anderson;D F Albertini

  • Cellular basis for paracrine regulation of ovarian follicle development

    David F. Albertini;Catherine M. H. Combelles;Elizabeth Benecchi;Mary Jo Carabatsos

  • The road to maturation: somatic cell interaction and self-organization of the mammalian oocyte

    Rong Li;David F. Albertini

  • The preimplantation mammalian embryo: characterization of intercellular junctions and their appearance during development.

    Thomas Ducibella;David F. Albertini;Everett Anderson;John D. Biggers

  • Characterization of oocyte and follicle development in growth differentiation factor-9-deficient mice

    Mary Jo Carabatsos;Julia Elvin;Martin M Matzuk;David F Albertini

  • Oocyte-granulosa cell heterologous gap junctions are required for the coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic meiotic competence.

    Mary Jo Carabatsos;Caterina Sellitto;Daniel A. Goodenough;David F. Albertini

  • THE APPEARANCE AND STRUCTURE OF INTERCELLULAR CONNECTIONS DURING THE ONTOGENY OF THE RABBIT OVARIAN FOLLICLE WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO GAP JUNCTIONS

    David F. Albertini;Everett Anderson

  • Binding and internalization of heparin by vascular smooth muscle cells.

    John J. Castellot;Kent Wong;Brian Herman;Richard L. Hoover

  • Oogenesis: chromatin and microtubule dynamics during meiotic prophase.

    Britta A. Mattson;David F. Albertini

  • Assessment of nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation in in-vitro matured human oocytes

    C.M.H. Combelles;N.A. Cekleniak;C. Racowsky;D.F. Albertini

  • Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

    Vitaly A. Kushnir;David H. Barad;David F. Albertini;David F. Albertini;Sarah K. Darmon

  • Metaphase II oocytes from human unilaminar follicles grown in a multi-step culture system.

    Marie McLaughlin;D F Albertini;W. H. B. Wallace;Richard Anderson

  • Meiotic competence acquisition is associated with the appearance of M-phase characteristics in growing mouse oocytes.

    Dineli Wickramasinghe;Karl M. Ebert;David F. Albertini

  • Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications

    M. G. Da Broi;V. S. I. Giorgi;F. Wang;D. L. Keefe

  • Effects of glutathione-oxidizing agents on microtubule assembly and microtubule-dependent surface properties of human neutrophils.

    J M Oliver;D F Albertini;R D Berlin

  • Quantitative studies of changes in cortical granule number and distribution in the mouse oocyte during meiotic maturation.

    Tom Ducibella;Everett Anderson;David F. Albertini;Jeff Aalberg

  • Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Pig: Control of Pronuclear Formation and Integration with Improved Methods for Activation and Maintenance of Pregnancy

    Paul A. De Sousa;John R. Dobrinsky;Jie Zhu;Alan L. Archibald

  • Cytoplasmic motions, rheology, and structure probed by a novel magnetic particle method.

    P A Valberg;D F Albertini

  • Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte

    S.M. Messinger;D.F. Albertini

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian Herman
Brian Herman The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
John J. Bromfield
John J. Bromfield University of Florida
Richard A. Anderson
Richard A. Anderson University of Edinburgh
John D. Biggers
John D. Biggers Harvard University
Lin Liu
Lin Liu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Martin M. Matzuk
Martin M. Matzuk Baylor College of Medicine
John I. Clark
John I. Clark University of Washington
Janet M. Oliver
Janet M. Oliver University of New Mexico
Eileen A. McLaughlin
Eileen A. McLaughlin University of Wollongong
Rong Li
Rong Li Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring biology and biochemistry can open doors to a variety of online degrees and career opportunities in the health and science sectors. For those interested in food science or clinical health settings, a fast track nutrition degree online offers a quick and convenient way to gain specialized knowledge and enter the workforce sooner.

If you're looking to move into leadership or administrative roles in healthcare, pursuing the cheapest online mba in healthcare management can be a smart financial choice while expanding your expertise in business operations.

The demand for medical coding and health information specialists continues to grow. Comparing certified coding specialist (ccs) and other coding certifications is vital for understanding their differences, costs, and salary prospects. Before starting on this career path, it's helpful to know exactly how much do medical coders make to plan your future goals.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Albertini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles