World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
46
Citations
21050
World Ranking
3488
National Ranking
589

Nigel King publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel King sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 204 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Nigel King D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nigel King is affiliated with the University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily two main fields: Psychology and Dentistry, with a notable focus in several subfields including Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Oral Surgery, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their published work covers a variety of topics, prominently:

  • Cognitive and psychological constructs research
  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Representations and Identity
  • Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Nigel King has contributed articles to several academic journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Dental Education
  • Dental Traumatology
  • Infant and Child Development
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Hospitality & Society

Their recent published works include:

  • Thematic trajectory analysis: A temporal method for analysing dynamic qualitative data (2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology)
  • Potential application of template analysis in qualitative hospitality management research1 (2020, Hospitality & Society)
  • Well-being programmes in prisons in England and Wales: a mixed-methods study (2021, International Journal of Prisoner Health)
  • Understanding children's attention to traumatic dental injuries using eye-tracking (2022, Dental Traumatology)
  • Self-management of type 1 diabetes in young adults: Is it impeded by aspects of everyday life? A scoping review (2023, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robert P. Anthonappa
  • Vivien Burr
  • Vanessa Y Cho
  • Mark Heckmann
  • Janet H. Hsiao

Best Publications

  • Interviews in Qualitative Research

    Nigel King;Christine Horrocks

  • The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

    Joanna Brooks;Serena McCluskey;Emma L. Turley;Nigel King

  • Using interviews in qualitative research

    Nigel King

  • Doing Template Analysis

    Nigel King

  • The qualitative research interview

    Nigel King

  • Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning

    Tim Dornan;Henny Boshuizen;Nigel King;Albert Scherpbier

  • Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method

    Rosie Morrow;Alison Rodriguez;Nigel King

  • Innovation and Change In Organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Template Analysis for Business and Management Students

    Nigel King;Joanna M. Brooks

  • Innovation at Work: The Research Literature

    Nigel King

  • Innovation in working groups.

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Innovation in Organizations

    N. Anderson;Nigel King

  • Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches

    Nigel King

  • Doing Template Analysis: Evaluating an End of Life Care Service.

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • “You can’t Cure it so you have to Endure it”: The Experience of Adaptation to Diabetic Renal Disease

    Nigel King;Carmen Carroll;Peggy Newton;Tim Dornan

  • Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method

    Nigel King

  • Qualitative psychology in the real world: The utility of template analysis

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • Thematic Analysis inOrganisational Research

    Nigel King;Joanna Brooks

  • Organizational innovation in the UK:A case study of perceptions and processes

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson;Michael A. West

  • Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework

    Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf;Daniel Munday;Nigel King;Jeremy Dale

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Dornan
Tim Dornan Queen's University Belfast
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Henny P. A. Boshuizen
Henny P. A. Boshuizen The Open University
Carla Willig
Carla Willig City, University of London
Helen Cowie
Helen Cowie University of York
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Jonathan A. Smith
Jonathan A. Smith Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of professional pathways. Recent trends show a strong interest in flexible learning options, making online education a popular choice. Many students are now turning to a masters degree online to gain advanced knowledge and skills without pausing their careers.

For those seeking a quicker route to the workforce, online accelerated programs allow learners to complete their bachelor’s degrees faster through intensive coursework and flexible schedules.

Specialized fields also offer rewarding opportunities. Professionals interested in counseling, social justice, or community work increasingly pursue msw programs (Master of Social Work) tailored for online study and often available at affordable rates.

Finally, for those drawn to psychology, education, or behavior analysis, online bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) are a strategic step toward licensure and advanced careers.

Online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities offer flexibility and affordability—making it easier than ever to advance your education and reach your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles