World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3488 3213 589 539 204 21050

Nigel King publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nigel King between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nigel King published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2017. 9 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2017. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1987 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nigel King: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 3
1992 2
1993 1
1994 4
1995 2
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 9
2003 6
2004 4
2005 4
2006 3
2007 3
2008 8
2009 9
2010 8
2011 9
2012 14
2013 13
2014 17
2015 15
2016 7
2017 23
2018 12
2019 4
2020 6
2021 9
2022 8
2023 5
2024 5
2025 4
Total 236
Download as CSV

Nigel King publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 204 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 204
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Nigel King D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel King sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Nigel King is affiliated with the University of Huddersfield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily two main fields: Psychology and Dentistry, with a notable focus in several subfields including Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Oral Surgery, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their published work covers a variety of topics, prominently:

  • Cognitive and psychological constructs research
  • Dental Research and COVID-19
  • Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Representations and Identity
  • Dental Health and Care Utilization
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health

Nigel King has contributed articles to several academic journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Journal of Dental Education
  • Dental Traumatology
  • Infant and Child Development
  • Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
  • Hospitality & Society

Their recent published works include:

  • Thematic trajectory analysis: A temporal method for analysing dynamic qualitative data (2021, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology)
  • Potential application of template analysis in qualitative hospitality management research1 (2020, Hospitality & Society)
  • Well-being programmes in prisons in England and Wales: a mixed-methods study (2021, International Journal of Prisoner Health)
  • Understanding children's attention to traumatic dental injuries using eye-tracking (2022, Dental Traumatology)
  • Self-management of type 1 diabetes in young adults: Is it impeded by aspects of everyday life? A scoping review (2023, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews)

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Robert P. Anthonappa
  • Vivien Burr
  • Vanessa Y Cho
  • Mark Heckmann
  • Janet H. Hsiao

Best Publications

  • Interviews in Qualitative Research

    Nigel King;Christine Horrocks

  • The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research

    Joanna Brooks;Serena McCluskey;Emma L. Turley;Nigel King

  • Using interviews in qualitative research

    Nigel King

  • Doing Template Analysis

    Nigel King

  • The qualitative research interview

    Nigel King

  • Experience‐based learning: a model linking the processes and outcomes of medical students' workplace learning

    Tim Dornan;Henny Boshuizen;Nigel King;Albert Scherpbier

  • Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method

    Rosie Morrow;Alison Rodriguez;Nigel King

  • Innovation and Change In Organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Managing innovation and change : a critical guide for organizations

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Template Analysis for Business and Management Students

    Nigel King;Joanna M. Brooks

  • Innovation at Work: The Research Literature

    Nigel King

  • Innovation in working groups.

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson

  • Innovation in Organizations

    N. Anderson;Nigel King

  • Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches

    Nigel King

  • Doing Template Analysis: Evaluating an End of Life Care Service.

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • “You can’t Cure it so you have to Endure it”: The Experience of Adaptation to Diabetic Renal Disease

    Nigel King;Carmen Carroll;Peggy Newton;Tim Dornan

  • Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method

    Nigel King

  • Qualitative psychology in the real world: The utility of template analysis

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • Thematic Analysis inOrganisational Research

    Nigel King;Joanna Brooks

  • Organizational innovation in the UK:A case study of perceptions and processes

    Nigel King;Neil Anderson;Michael A. West

  • Applied Qualitative Research in Psychology

    Joanna Brooks;Nigel King

  • Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework

    Kashifa Mahmood-Yousuf;Daniel Munday;Nigel King;Jeremy Dale

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Dornan
Tim Dornan Queen's University Belfast
Neil Anderson
Neil Anderson University of Bradford
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier
Albert J. J. A. Scherpbier Maastricht University
Alison Wearden
Alison Wearden University of Manchester
Michael West
Michael West Duke University
Henny P. A. Boshuizen
Henny P. A. Boshuizen The Open University
Carla Willig
Carla Willig City, University of London
Helen Cowie
Helen Cowie University of York
Brett Smith
Brett Smith Durham University
Jonathan A. Smith
Jonathan A. Smith Birkbeck, University of London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide range of professional pathways. Recent trends show a strong interest in flexible learning options, making online education a popular choice. Many students are now turning to a masters degree online to gain advanced knowledge and skills without pausing their careers.

For those seeking a quicker route to the workforce, online accelerated programs allow learners to complete their bachelor’s degrees faster through intensive coursework and flexible schedules.

Specialized fields also offer rewarding opportunities. Professionals interested in counseling, social justice, or community work increasingly pursue msw programs (Master of Social Work) tailored for online study and often available at affordable rates.

Finally, for those drawn to psychology, education, or behavior analysis, online bcba programs (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) are a strategic step toward licensure and advanced careers.

Online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities offer flexibility and affordability—making it easier than ever to advance your education and reach your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles