World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9398 9000 3368 3120 87 6422

Nancy Grulke publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nancy Grulke between 1983 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nancy Grulke published across 42 years, from 1983 to 2024, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2007. 2 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2007. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1983 2024

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nancy Grulke: publications per year, 1983 to 2024
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 2
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 4
2004 2
2005 5
2006 0
2007 7
2008 2
2009 3
2010 4
2011 5
2012 1
2013 0
2014 5
2015 0
2016 6
2017 1
2018 1
2019 3
2020 5
2021 2
2022 6
2023 0
2024 2
Total 91
Download as CSV

Nancy Grulke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Grulke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 87 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 87
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Nancy Grulke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nancy Grulke sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Nancy Grulke is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on global and planetary change. Their work spans several subfields, notably environmental engineering, ecology, nature and landscape conservation, and plant science.

Their research topics cover a variety of areas related to forest and plant health, including plant water relations and carbon dynamics, fire effects on ecosystems, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, forest ecology and management, remote sensing in agriculture, hydrology and drought analysis, and tree-ring climate responses.

They have contributed to publications in multiple venues. The most frequent publication venues include Forest Ecology and Management, Remote Sensing, Climate, Weed Science, and Forests.

Frequent coauthors in their work are Craig Bienz, Kellie A. Uyeda, Charlie Schrader-Patton, Andrew G. Merschel, and Kate Hrinkevich.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Nancy Grulke include:

  • Quantitative and qualitative approaches to assess tree vigor and stand health in dry pine forests, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Pre-Emptive Detection of Mature Pine Drought Stress Using Multispectral Aerial Imagery, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Assessment of Ponderosa Pine Vigor Using Four-Band Aerial Imagery in South Central Oregon: Crown Objects to Landscapes, 2021, Forests
  • Plant life span and persistence of soil seedbanks predict the emergence of herbicide resistance in noxious weeds, 2022, Weed Science
  • Assessing Tree Water Balance after Forest Thinning Treatments Using Thermal and Multispectral Imaging, 2024, Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source

    Walter C. Oechel;Steven J. Hastings;George Vourlitis;Mitchell Jenkins

  • Coupling biogeochemical cycles in urban environments: ecosystem services, green solutions, and misconceptions

    Diane E. Pataki;Margaret M. Carreiro;Jennifer Cherrier;Nancy E. Grulke

  • Transient nature of CO 2 fertilization in Arctic tundra

    Walter C. Oechel;Sid Cowles;Nancy Grulke;Steven J. Hastings

  • Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems.

    Nancy E. Grulke;R. L. Heath

  • Carbon balance in tussock tundra under ambient and elevated atmospheric CO2.

    N. E. Grulke;G. H. Riechers;W. C. Oechel;U. Hjelm

  • Does living in elevated CO2 ameliorate tree response to ozone? A review on stomatal responses.

    Elena Paoletti;Nancy E. Grulke

  • Ozone exposure and stomatal sluggishness in different plant physiognomic classes.

    Elena Paoletti;Nancy E. Grulke

  • Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change.

    Michael Tausz;Nancy E. Grulke;Gerhard Wieser

  • Ozone exposure and nitrogen deposition lowers root biomass of ponderosa pine in the San Bernardino Mountains, California

    Nancy Grulke;C.P. Andersen;M.E. Fenn;P.R. Miller

  • Changes in gas exchange characteristics during the life span of giant sequoia: implications for response to current and future concentrations of atmospheric ozone

    N. E. Grulke;P. R. Miller

  • Summer-time distribution of air pollutants in Sequoia National Park, California.

    Andrzej Bytnerowicz;Michael Tausz;Rocio Alonso;Rocio Alonso;David Jones

  • Global topics and novel approaches in the study of air pollution, climate change and forest ecosystems

    Pierre Sicard;Algirdas Augustaitis;Salim Belyazid;Carlo Calfapietra

  • DO 3 SE modelling of soil moisture to determine ozone flux to forest trees

    P. Buker;T. Morrissey;A. Briolat;R. Falk

  • Deciduous conifers : High N deposition and O3 exposure effects on growth and biomass allocation in ponderosa pine

    Nancy Grulke;L. Balduman

  • Adaptation of forest ecosystems to air pollution and climate change: a global assessment on research priorities

    Y. Serengil;A. Augustaitis;Andrzej Bytnerowicz;Nancy Grulke

  • Changes in physiological attributes of ponderosa pine from seedling to mature tree

    Nancy E. Grulke;William A. Retzlaff

  • Stomata open at night in pole-sized and mature ponderosa pine: implications for O3 exposure metrics

    Nancy Grulke;R. Alonso;T. Nguyen;C. Cascio

  • Impacts of air pollution and climate change on forest ecosystems--emerging research needs.

    Elena Paoletti;Andrzej Bytnerowicz;Chris Andersen;Algirdas Augustaitis

  • Physiological Responses of Ponderosa Pine to Gradients of Environmental Stressors

    N. E. Grulke

  • Comparison of calculated and measured foliar O3 flux in crop and forest species

    Nancy Grulke;E. Paoletti;R.L. Heath

Frequent Co-Authors

Elena Paoletti
Elena Paoletti National Research Council (CNR)
Andrzej Bytnerowicz
Andrzej Bytnerowicz US Forest Service
Michael Tausz
Michael Tausz University of Melbourne
Rainer Matyssek
Rainer Matyssek Technical University of Munich
Mark E. Fenn
Mark E. Fenn US Forest Service
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
Gerhard Wieser
Gerhard Wieser University of Innsbruck
Haiganoush K. Preisler
Haiganoush K. Preisler US Forest Service
Marcus Schaub
Marcus Schaub Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
John S. King
John S. King North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Fields such as social work play a vital role in community and environmental advocacy, and students can pursue specialized programs like online dsw programs in social work to enhance their impact.

Alternatively, if you're looking for flexibility and a broad foundation, a cheap online general studies degree allows you to tailor your coursework to multiple interests, including environmental policy and sustainability.

Students often wonder about workload intensity when choosing a major. If simplicity is a priority, understanding what's the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help balance academic demands with personal goals while still fostering knowledge applicable to environmental sectors.

For a more specific focus, pursuing a geology degree online offers targeted training in earth sciences, closely aligned with environmental careers involving natural resources and conservation.

Best Scientists Citing Nancy Grulke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles