World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Nadia Garnefski

Nadia Garnefski

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
18915
World Ranking
4312
National Ranking
207

Nadia Garnefski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Garnefski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nadia Garnefski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nadia Garnefski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nadia Garnefski is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology, with a particular focus on clinical and experimental aspects. Their research spans multiple subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, infectious diseases, and social psychology.

The main areas of study for Garnefski encompass anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes. Additionally, their research addresses family caregiving in mental illness, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, HIV/AIDS research and interventions, digital mental health interventions, and broader mental health research topics including treatment and access.

Garnefski has published in several academic venues with multiple articles appearing in AIDS and Behavior. Other significant publication venues include The Lancet Psychiatry, PLoS ONE, Journal of Medical Internet Research, and Psychology and Aging.

Recent published papers by Garnefski feature various facets of mental health and therapy:

  • "Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data" (2021, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • "Blended Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Versus Face-to-face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults With Anxiety Symptoms in Primary Care: Pragmatic Single-blind Cluster Randomized Trial" (2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • "Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention vs. a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy intervention for older adults with anxiety symptoms: A randomized controlled trial" (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • "Prevalence of anxiety disorders and subthreshold anxiety throughout later life: Systematic review and meta-analysis." (2020, Psychology and Aging)
  • "Academic stress, mindfulness-related skills and mental health in international university students" (2022, Journal of American College Health)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Garnefski include Vivian Kraaij, Philip Spinhoven, Maartje Witlox, Sanne van Luenen, and Ernst T. Bohlmeijer.

Best Publications

  • Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems

    N Garnefski;V Kraaij;P Spinhoven

  • Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A comparative study of five specific samples

    Nadia Garnefski;Vivian Kraaij

  • The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Psychometric Features and Prospective Relationships with Depression and Anxiety in Adults

    Nadia Garnefski;Vivian Kraaij

  • Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire - development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short).

    Nadia Garnefski;Vivian Kraaij

  • Cognitive coping strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety: a comparison between adolescents and adults.

    Nadia Garnefski;Jeroen Legerstee;Vivian V Kraaij;Tessa Van Den Kommer

  • Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: differences between males and females

    Nadia Garnefski;Jan Teerds;Vivian Kraaij;Jeroen Legerstee

  • The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and emotional problems: comparison between a clinical and a non-clinical sample

    Nadia Garnefski;Tessa Van Den Kommer;Vivian Kraaij;Jan Teerds

  • Specificity of relations between adolescents' cognitive emotion regulation strategies and Internalizing and Externalizing psychopathology.

    Nadia Garnefski;Vivian Kraaij;Marije van Etten

  • Negative life events and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: Bonding and cognitive coping as vulnerability factors?

    Vivian Kraaij;Nadia Garnefski;Erik Jan de Wilde;Arie Dijkstra

  • Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and emotional problems in 9 - 11-year-old children: the development of an instrument.

    Nadia Garnefski;Carolien Rieffe;Francine Jellesma;Mark Meerum Terwogt

  • Adolescent goal content and pursuit: A review of the literature from the past 16 years.

    Emma K. Massey;Winifred A. Gebhardt;Nadia Garnefski

  • Perceived Social Support from Family, School, and Peers: Relationship with Emotional and Behavioral Problems among Adolescents

    Nadia Garnefski;René F.W. Diekstra

  • Sexual abuse and adolescent maladjustment: differences between male and female victims

    Nadia Garnefski;Ellen Arends

  • Cognitive coping and depressive symptoms in the elderly: a longitudinal study.

    V Kraaij;E Pruymboom;N Garnefski

  • Cognitive–behavioural intervention for self-harm: randomised controlled trial

    Nadja Slee;Nadia Garnefski;Rien van der Leeden;Ella Arensman

  • Brief report: Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and psychological adjustment in adolescents with a chronic disease.

    Nadia Garnefski;Hendrik Koopman;Vivian Kraaij;Rebecca ten Cate

  • Specificity of relations between adolescents' cognitive emotion regulation strategies and symptoms of depression and anxiety.

    Nadia Garnefski;Vivian Kraaij

  • On the Nature, Magnitude, and Causality of Suicidal Behaviors: An International Perspective

    Rene F. W. Diekstra;Nadia Garnefski

  • Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data.

    Toshi A. Furukawa;Aya Suganuma;Edoardo G. Ostinelli;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Child Sexual Abuse and Emotional and Behavioral Problems in Adolescence: Gender Differences

    Nadia Garnefski;René F.W. Diekstra

  • Adolescents from one parent, stepparent and intact families: emotional problems and suicide attempts

    Nadia Garnefski;René F.W. Diekstra

  • Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire

    N. Garnefski;V. Kraaij;P. Spinhoven

Frequent Co-Authors

Vivian Kraaij
Vivian Kraaij Leiden University
Maya J. Schroevers
Maya J. Schroevers University Medical Center Groningen
Philip Spinhoven
Philip Spinhoven Leiden University
René F. W. Diekstra
René F. W. Diekstra Roosevelt University
Stan Maes
Stan Maes Leiden University
Ella Arensman
Ella Arensman University College Cork
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Viktor Kaldo
Viktor Kaldo Karolinska Institute
Arie Dijkstra
Arie Dijkstra University of Groningen
Michael Witthöft
Michael Witthöft Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA offers a wide range of online study and career options. With flexible online programs, students can specialize in various fields, such as clinical psychology, counseling, or become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). Earning a BCBA certification opens up growing opportunities in educational, healthcare, and community settings.

The path to becoming a BCBA varies by location and may include different state requirements or exam processes. For example, if you are interested in becoming a bcba in Jacksonville or exploring options for becoming a bcba in Jersey City, it's important to understand the specific licensing and educational demands for those regions.

Additionally, guidance for how to become a bcba in Kansas City and support for becoming a bcba in Laredo can help you identify required supervised hours, exam criteria, and potential employers in your area. These resources are vital for anyone looking to start or advance their psychology career online across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Nadia Garnefski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles