World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11344 358 306 29934

Michelle Lane publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michelle Lane between 1992 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michelle Lane published across 33 years, from 1992 to 2024, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2009. 1 of the 313 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2009. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1992 2024

313 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michelle Lane: publications per year, 1992 to 2024
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 2
1994 4
1995 1
1996 4
1997 11
1998 7
1999 13
2000 14
2001 13
2002 13
2003 14
2004 8
2005 16
2006 17
2007 19
2008 17
2009 23
2010 17
2011 16
2012 21
2013 8
2014 15
2015 11
2016 5
2017 5
2018 5
2019 6
2020 1
2021 4
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
Total 313
Download as CSV

Michelle Lane publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle Lane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–320 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 306 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834 306
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michelle Lane D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michelle Lane sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michelle Lane was affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with specific contributions in Reproductive Medicine and related subfields.

The main areas of study in their work included:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Their publication record covered multiple venues, including:

  • Asian Journal of Andrology
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • BMC Infectious Diseases

Among their recent scientific papers were:

  • Metformin treatment of high-fat diet-fed obese male mice restores sperm function and fetal growth, without requiring weight loss, published in 2020 in Asian Journal of Andrology
  • Use of a male antioxidant nutraceutical is associated with superior live birth rates during IVF treatment, published in 2020 in Asian Journal of Andrology
  • Analysis of mouse embryo development in culture and assessment of viability, published in 2021 in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Supplementation of a High-Fat High-Sucrose Diet With Methyl-Donor Nutrients During Pregnancy and Lactation Modulates the Colonic Vitamin D Signaling Pathway in Weaned Rats, published in 2022 in Current Developments in Nutrition
  • A statistically established reference value determined for the Vaxarray Coronavirus (CoV) seroassay to characterize vaccination and natural infection, published in 2024 in BMC Infectious Diseases

Frequent co-authors collaborating with this researcher included:

  • Nicole O. McPherson
  • Kelton Tremellen
  • Richard Woodman
  • Amy Hill
  • Helana Shehadeh

Their work contributed to areas such as the effects of nutritional supplements on reproductive health, embryonic development, and infectious disease seroassays. Their studies often intersected reproductive biology and public health topics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical science.

Best Publications

  • Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer

    David K Gardner;Michelle Lane;John Stevens;Terry Schlenker

  • Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality

    Robert B. Gilchrist;Michelle Lane;Jeremy G. Thompson

  • Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers

    David K Gardner;Pauline Vella;Michelle J Lane;Lyla Wagley

  • Enhanced rates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotes cultured to the blastocyst stage in vitro in the absence of serum and somatic cells: amino acids, vitamins, and culturing embryos in groups stimulate development.

    David K. Gardner;Michelle Lane;Anitje Spitzer;Paul A. Batt

  • Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF?

    DK Gardner;M Lane

  • Paternal obesity initiates metabolic disturbances in two generations of mice with incomplete penetrance to the F2 generation and alters the transcriptional profile of testis and sperm microRNA content

    Tod Fullston;E. Maria C. Ohlsson Teague;Nicole O. Palmer;Miles J. DeBlasio

  • Vitrification of mouse and human blastocysts using a novel cryoloop container-less technique.

    Michelle Lane;William B Schoolcraft;David K Gardner;D Phil

  • Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture.

    David K. Gardner;Michelle Lane

  • Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells

    David K. Gardner;Michelle Lane;Ilan Calderon;John Leeton

  • Role of retinoid signalling in the adult brain

    Michelle A. Lane;Sarah J. Bailey

  • Obese Women Exhibit Differences in Ovarian Metabolites, Hormones, and Gene Expression Compared with Moderate-Weight Women

    Rebecca L. Robker;Lisa K. Akison;Brenton D. Bennett;Penny N. Thrupp

  • Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids

    M. Lane;D. K. Gardner

  • Impact of obesity on male fertility, sperm function and molecular composition.

    Nicole O. Palmer;Hassan W. Bakos;Tod Fullston;Michelle Lane

  • Noninvasive assessment of human embryo nutrient consumption as a measure of developmental potential.

    David K Gardner;Michelle Lane;John Stevens;William B Schoolcraft

  • High-fat diet causes lipotoxicity responses in cumulus-oocyte complexes and decreased fertilization rates.

    Linda Lin Yan Wu;Kylie R. Dunning;Xing Yang;Xing Yang;Darryl L. Russell

  • Effect of incubation volume and embryo density on the development and viability of mouse embryos in vitro

    Michelle Lane;David K. Gardner

  • Selection of viable mouse blastocysts prior to transfer using a metabolic criterion.

    Michelle Lane;David K. Gardner

  • Parenting from before conception

    Michelle Lane;Rebecca L. Robker;Sarah A. Robertson

  • Simulated physiological oocyte maturation (SPOM): a novel in vitro maturation system that substantially improves embryo yield and pregnancy outcomes

    F.K. Albuz;M. Sasseville;M. Lane;D.T. Armstrong

  • Alleviation of the '2-cell block' and development to the blastocyst of CF1 mouse embryos: Role of amino acids, EDTA and physical parameters

    David K. Gardner;Michelle Lane

Frequent Co-Authors

David K. Gardner
David K. Gardner University of Melbourne
Jeremy G. Thompson
Jeremy G. Thompson University of Adelaide
Barry D. Bavister
Barry D. Bavister University of New Orleans
Rebecca L. Robker
Rebecca L. Robker University of Adelaide
Darryl L. Russell
Darryl L. Russell University of Adelaide
Robert J. Norman
Robert J. Norman University of Adelaide
Sarah A. Robertson
Sarah A. Robertson University of Adelaide
Francisco Gonzalez-Lima
Francisco Gonzalez-Lima The University of Texas at Austin
Jay M. Baltz
Jay M. Baltz Ottawa Hospital
David T. Armstrong
David T. Armstrong National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those exploring alternatives to the traditional path of studying medicine in the USA, there are flexible online degree programs and diverse healthcare careers to consider. Nursing is a popular choice, offering a variety of entry points for different educational backgrounds.

Registered nurses can pursue degree advancement through rn to bsn online programs, which provide a convenient way to earn a bachelor's degree while continuing to work. Individuals with a non-nursing background can also make a career change with direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online, designed for those who hold a bachelor’s degree in another field.

For those interested in advanced roles, online phd programs nursing offer an opportunity to pursue specialized leadership or research positions within healthcare. Additionally, if you're seeking accessible options, there are nursing schools with high acceptance rates that may ease your entry into this field.

Exploring these pathways not only broadens career opportunities but also makes healthcare education more accessible to students from various backgrounds and life stages.

Best Scientists Citing Michelle Lane

Recently Published Articles