World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 74 2145 1959 1017 909 233 15647

Francisco Gonzalez-Lima publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Francisco Gonzalez-Lima between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Francisco Gonzalez-Lima published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 11 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications 2026: 1 publication
1981 2026

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Francisco Gonzalez-Lima: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 5
1985 1
1986 3
1987 3
1988 2
1989 4
1990 1
1991 4
1992 7
1993 3
1994 7
1995 4
1996 1
1997 6
1998 8
1999 5
2000 7
2001 9
2002 10
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 8
2007 5
2008 9
2009 7
2010 7
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 12
2015 3
2016 10
2017 16
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 12
2022 6
2023 2
2024 4
2025 10
2026 1
Total 252
Download as CSV

Francisco Gonzalez-Lima publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Gonzalez-Lima sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 228–237 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 233 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220 233
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Francisco Gonzalez-Lima D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco Gonzalez-Lima sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189 74
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Francisco Gonzalez-Lima is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within medicine and neuroscience, with a significant focus on techniques involving laser applications and brain function.

The scientist's main fields of study include Medicine and Neuroscience, with substantial publications also in subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Pharmacology.

Key research topics covered in their work are:

  • Laser Applications in Dentistry and Medicine
  • Photoreceptor and Optogenetics Research
  • Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Medical and Biological Ozone Research
  • Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study

Francisco Gonzalez-Lima's recent research publications include:

  • Transcranial laser stimulation: Mitochondrial and cerebrovascular effects in younger and older healthy adults (2021, Brain Stimulation)
  • Photobiomodulation for the aging brain (2021, Ageing Research Reviews)
  • Photobiomodulation of Cytochrome c Oxidase by Chronic Transcranial Laser in Young and Aged Brains (2022, Frontiers in Neuroscience)
  • Transcranial photobiomodulation-induced changes in human brain functional connectivity and network metrics mapped by whole-head functional near-infrared spectroscopy in vivo (2020, Biomedical Optics Express)
  • Transcranial photobiomodulation and thermal stimulation induce distinct topographies of EEG alpha and beta power changes in healthy humans (2021, Scientific Reports)

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Molecular Neurobiology
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience

Among their frequent collaborators are Douglas W. Barrett, Fabrízio dos Santos Cardoso, Sérgio Gomes da Silva, Roger E. Davis, and Jorge Almeida. These collaborations have contributed to a broad and interdisciplinary scope within their research outputs.

Best Publications

  • Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging

    A. R. McLntosh;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Prefrontal mechanisms in extinction of conditioned fear.

    Gregory J. Quirk;René Garcia;Francisco González-Lima

  • Transcranial infrared laser stimulation produces beneficial cognitive and emotional effects in humans

    D. W. Barrett;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Antidepressant-Like Effects of Medial Prefrontal Cortex Deep Brain Stimulation in Rats

    Clement Hamani;Clement Hamani;Mustansir Diwan;Carlos E. Macedo;Marcus L. Brandão

  • Low-level light therapy of the eye and brain.

    Julio C Rojas;F Gonzalez-Lima

  • Energy Hypometabolism in Posterior Cingulate Cortex of Alzheimer's Patients: Superficial Laminar Cytochrome Oxidase Associated with Disease Duration

    J. Valla;Jason D. Berndt;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Opposite metabolic changes in the habenula and ventral tegmental area of a genetic model of helpless behavior.

    Jason D Shumake;E. Edwards;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Structural modeling of functional neural pathways mapped with 2-deoxyglucose: effects of acoustic startle habituation on the auditory system.

    A. R. McIntosh;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Neurological and psychological applications of transcranial lasers and LEDs.

    Julio C. Rojas;F. Gonzalez-Lima

  • Computational approaches to network analysis in functional brain imaging

    F. Gonzalez‐Lima;A. R. McIntosh;Peter T. Fox

  • Neurometabolic mechanisms for memory enhancement and neuroprotection of methylene blue

    Julio C. Rojas;Aleksandra K. Bruchey;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Up-regulation of cerebral cytochrome-c-oxidase and hemodynamics by transcranial infrared laser stimulation: A broadband near-infrared spectroscopy study

    Xinlong Wang;Fenghua Tian;Divya D Reddy;Sahil S Nalawade

  • Metabolic Mapping of Mouse Brain Activity after Extinction of a Conditioned Emotional Response

    Douglas Barrett;Jason Shumake;Dirk Jones;F. Gonzalez-Lima

  • Cytochrome oxidase activity in the auditory system of the mouse: A qualitative and quantitative histochemical study

    F. Gonzalez-Lima;A. Cada

  • Quantitative mapping of cytovhrome oxidase activity in the central auditory system of the gerbil: a study with calibrated activity standards and metal-intensified histochemistry

    Francisco Gonzalez-Lima;D. Jones

  • Improving executive function using transcranial infrared laser stimulation.

    Nathaniel J. Blanco;W. Todd Maddox;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Brain systems underlying susceptibility to helplessness and depression.

    Jason D Shumake;Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

  • Neuroprotective Effects of Near-Infrared Light in an In Vivo Model of Mitochondrial Optic Neuropathy

    Julio C. Rojas;Jung Lee;Joseph M. John;F. Gonzalez-Lima

  • Methylene blue improves brain oxidative metabolism and memory retention in rats.

    Narriman Lee Callaway;Penny D Riha;Aleksandra K Bruchey;Zeenat Munshi

  • Network interactions among limbic cortices, basal forebrain, and cerebellum differentiate a tone conditioned as a Pavlovian excitor or inhibitor: fluorodeoxyglucose mapping and covariance structural modeling

    A. R. McIntosh;F. Gonzalez-Lima

  • Neuregulin-1 immunoglobulin-like domain mutant mice: clozapine sensitivity and impaired latent inhibition.

    Mendell Rimer;Douglas W. Barrett;Monica A. Maldonado;Vita M. Vock

Frequent Co-Authors

Anthony R. McIntosh
Anthony R. McIntosh Simon Fraser University
David Crews
David Crews The University of Texas at Austin
Eric M. Reiman
Eric M. Reiman Arizona State University
Henning Scheich
Henning Scheich Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Michelle Lane
Michelle Lane University of Adelaide
Timothy J Schallert
Timothy J Schallert The University of Texas at Austin
Marie H. Monfils
Marie H. Monfils The University of Texas at Austin
Michael J. Telch
Michael J. Telch The University of Texas at Austin
Darla M. Castelli
Darla M. Castelli The University of Texas at Austin
Kewei Chen
Kewei Chen Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Francisco Gonzalez-Lima

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles