World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
96
Citations
37401
World Ranking
9588
National Ranking
4936

Michael Menaker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Menaker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 231 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michael Menaker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Menaker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1999 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 1983 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1971 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Michael Menaker was affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Throughout their career, Menaker contributed to the scientific community primarily through research activities linked to their institutional role.

Over the course of their professional work, Menaker received several recognitions for their contributions to science. These included being named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1999, a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1983, and a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1971.

No detailed information on specific research topics, papers, coauthors, publication venues, or book publications was available for Michael Menaker. Similarly, there is no data on primary or subfields of study, nor on main topics addressed during their career.

Menaker was noted as deceased, thus all references to their career and achievements are made in the past tense.

Best Publications

  • PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE real-time reporting of circadian dynamics reveals persistent circadian oscillations in mouse peripheral tissues

    Seung Hee Yoo;Shin Yamazaki;Shin Yamazaki;Phillip L. Lowrey;Kazuhiro Shimomura

  • Transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus determines circadian period

    Martin R. Ralph;Russell G. Foster;Fred C. Davis;Michael Menaker

  • Resetting Central and Peripheral Circadian Oscillators in Transgenic Rats

    Shin Yamazaki;Rika Numano;Michikazu Abe;Akiko Hida

  • Entrainment of the Circadian Clock in the Liver by Feeding

    Karl-Arne Stokkan;Shin Yamazaki;Hajime Tei;Yoshiyuki Sakaki

  • Positional Syntenic Cloning and Functional Characterization of the Mammalian Circadian Mutation tau

    Phillip L. Lowrey;Kazuhiro Shimomura;Marina P. Antoch;Shin Yamazaki

  • The circadian rhythm of body temperature.

    Roberto Refinetti;Michael Menaker

  • A Mutation of the Circadian System in Golden Hamsters

    Martin R. Ralph;Michael Menaker

  • Circadian rhythms in cultured mammalian retina.

    Gianluca Tosini;Michael Menaker

  • Circadian rhythms in isolated brain regions.

    Michikazu Abe;Erik D. Herzog;Erik D. Herzog;Shin Yamazaki;Marty Straume

  • Spectral sensitivity of a novel photoreceptive system mediating entrainment of mammalian circadian rhythms.

    Joseph S. Takahashi;Joseph S. Takahashi;Patricia J. Decoursey;Patricia J. Decoursey;Lisa Bauman;Lisa Bauman;Michael Menaker

  • Circadian photoreception in the retinally degenerate mouse (rd/rd).

    R. G. Foster;I. Provencio;D. Hudson;S. Fiske

  • Dysregulation of Inflammatory Responses by Chronic Circadian Disruption

    Oscar Castanon-Cervantes;Mingwei Wu;J. Christopher Ehlen;Ketema Paul

  • Pineal Function: The Biological Clock in the Sparrow?

    Suzanne Gaston;Michael Menaker

  • Chronic jet-lag increases mortality in aged mice

    A. J. Davidson;M. T. Sellix;J. Daniel;Shin Yamazaki

  • Genetic control of melatonin synthesis in the pineal gland of the mouse.

    Shizufumi Ebihara;Theodore Marks;David J. Hudson;Michael Menaker

  • Photoperiodic Control of Hamster Testis

    Suzanne Gaston;Michael Menaker

  • Retinal rhythms in chicks: circadian variation in melantonin and serotonin N-acetyltransferase activity

    Heidi E. Hamm;Michael Menaker

  • Is the avian circadian system a neuroendocrine loop

    Vincent M. Cassone;Michael Menaker

  • Effects of aging on central and peripheral mammalian clocks

    Shin Yamazaki;Marty Straume;Hajime Tei;Yoshiyuki Sakaki

  • Dose-response relationship between light irradiance and the suppression of plasma melatonin in human volunteers.

    George C. Brainard;Alfred J. Lewy;Michael Menaker;Richard H. Fredrickson

Frequent Co-Authors

Shin Yamazaki
Shin Yamazaki The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Gene D. Block
Gene D. Block University of California, Los Angeles
Joseph S. Takahashi
Joseph S. Takahashi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Gianluca Tosini
Gianluca Tosini Morehouse School of Medicine
Yoshiyuki Sakaki
Yoshiyuki Sakaki Toyohashi University of Technology
Russell G. Foster
Russell G. Foster University of Oxford
Christopher S. Colwell
Christopher S. Colwell University of California, Los Angeles
Martin R. Ralph
Martin R. Ralph University of Toronto
Heidi E. Hamm
Heidi E. Hamm Vanderbilt University
Mark Quigg
Mark Quigg University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn’t always mean becoming a physician. There are many alternative healthcare degrees and career tracks you can explore online to enter the field or advance your credentials.

For those looking to quickly join the healthcare workforce, fast lpn program options let you become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time. Nursing professionals interested in mental health can consider online pmhnp programs to specialize as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, a high-demand specialty.

If you’re more interested in the business or administrative side of healthcare, a bachelors in healthcare administration can open doors to entry-level management roles in hospitals, clinics, and other organizations. For more advanced leadership positions, affordable cheap mha programs are available online for working professionals.

These flexible online pathways offer a range of options to get started in healthcare or move up in your career—often at a lower cost and faster pace than traditional routes.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Menaker

Recently Published Articles