World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 16893 15886 8473 7836 226 39002

Michael M. Engelgau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael M. Engelgau between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael M. Engelgau published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2004. 1 of the 233 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2004. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 14 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1993 2025

233 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael M. Engelgau: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 4
1995 6
1996 3
1997 2
1998 8
1999 9
2000 14
2001 13
2002 14
2003 13
2004 20
2005 15
2006 13
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 3
2011 12
2012 2
2013 15
2014 5
2015 9
2016 8
2017 9
2018 9
2019 8
2020 2
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 233
Download as CSV

Michael M. Engelgau publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Engelgau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 226 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487 226
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael M. Engelgau D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael M. Engelgau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Kelly West Award, American Diabetes Association

Overview

Michael M. Engelgau is affiliated with the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute in the United States. Their research intersects multiple areas related to health disparities, precision medicine, and public health policies, with a particular focus on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes management.

The scientist has contributed to several recent papers, including:

  • Precision Health Analytics With Predictive Analytics and Implementation Research, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Tackling Health Disparities, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Screening for diabetes in an African-American community: the Project DIRECT experience., 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Emerging Concepts in Precision Medicine and Cardiovascular Diseases in Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations, 2025, UNC Libraries

The topics covered in Engelgau's work prominently include:

  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Diabetes Management and Education

Their subfields of study span:

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Health Information Management
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Health

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Engelgau include:

  • Muin J. Khoury
  • Cheryl Anne Boyce
  • Kathleen N. Fenton
  • Melissa C. Green Parker
  • George Papanicolaou

Engelgau has published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • UNC Libraries

In recognition of contributions to diabetes research, Engelgau received the Kelly West Award from the American Diabetes Association in 2004.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of Self-Management Training in Type 2 Diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

    Susan L. Norris;Michael M. Engelgau;K.M. Venkat Narayan

  • Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control

    Susan L. Norris;Joseph Lau;S. Jay Smith;Christopher H. Schmid

  • Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis

    Robert Beaglehole;Ruth Bonita;Richard Horton;Cary Adams

  • Prevalence of Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose in Adults in the U.S. Population National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2002

    Catherine C. Cowie;Keith F. Rust;Danita D. Byrd-Holt;Mark S. Eberhardt

  • Type 2 diabetes among North adolescents: An epidemiologic health perspective

    Anne Fagot-Campagna;David J. Pettitt;Michael M. Engelgau;Nilka Ríos Burrows

  • Screening for type 2 diabetes.

    M M Engelgau;K M Narayan;W H Herman

  • Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998.

    A H Mokdad;E S Ford;B A Bowman;D E Nelson

  • The evolving diabetes burden in the United States.

    Michael M Engelgau;Linda S Geiss;Jinan B Saaddine;James P Boyle

  • The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifestyle Modification or Metformin in Preventing Type 2 Diabetes in Adults with Impaired Glucose Tolerance

    William H. Herman;Thomas J. Hoerger;Michael Brandle;Katherine Hicks

  • Improvements in Diabetes Processes of Care and Intermediate Outcomes: United States, 1988–2002

    Jinan B Saaddine;Betsy Cadwell;Edward W Gregg;Michael M Engelgau

  • A Diabetes Report Card for the United States: Quality of Care in the 1990s

    Jinan B Saaddine;Michael M Engelgau;Gloria L Beckles;Edward W Gregg

  • Cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, and diabetes incidence after lifestyle intervention for people with impaired glucose tolerance in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 23-year follow-up study

    Guangwei Li;Ping Zhang;Jinping Wang;Yali An

  • Prevalence of lower-extremity disease in the U.S. adult population ≥40 years of age with and without diabetes: 1999-2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Edward W. Gregg;Paul Sorlie;Ryne Paulose-Ram;Qiuping Gu

  • Decline in Cardiovascular Mortality: Possible Causes and Implications

    George A. Mensah;Gina S. Wei;Paul D. Sorlie;Lawrence J. Fine

  • The Effectiveness of Disease and Case Management for People with Diabetes A Systematic Review

    Susan L Norris;Phyllis J Nichols;Carl J Caspersen;Russell E Glasgow

  • Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes

    Thomas J. Hoerger;Albert D. Bethke;Anke Richter;Stephen W. Sorensen

  • Diabetes and physical disability among older U.S. adults.

    E W Gregg;G L Beckles;D F Williamson;S G Leveille

  • Microalbuminuria in the US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

    Camille A. Jones;Mildred E. Francis;Mark S. Eberhardt;Blanche Chavers

  • Comparison of Fasting and 2-Hour Glucose and HbA1c Levels for Diagnosing Diabetes: Diagnostic criteria and performance revisited

    Michael M Engelgau;Theodore J Thompson;William H Herman;James P Boyle

  • Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings. A systematic review.

    Susan L Norris;Phyllis J Nichols;Carl J Caspersen;Russell E Glasgow

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward W. Gregg
Edward W. Gregg Imperial College London
K.M. Venkat Narayan
K.M. Venkat Narayan Emory University
William H. Herman
William H. Herman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
George A. Mensah
George A. Mensah National Institutes of Health
Robert E. Ratner
Robert E. Ratner Georgetown University
David F. Williamson
David F. Williamson Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Ajay Mahal
Ajay Mahal University of Melbourne
Giuseppina Imperatore
Giuseppina Imperatore Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Ali H. Mokdad
Ali H. Mokdad University of Washington
Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career in the USA can take many paths, including several flexible online options. For nurses seeking advanced leadership roles, dnp online programs offer a convenient way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice while balancing work commitments. These programs often suit experienced RNs aiming for top clinical or executive positions.

Those looking for a quicker entry into healthcare might consider an accelerated lpn program. Fast-track options can lead to licensure as a practical nurse in as little as a year, offering a streamlined start to a rewarding nursing career.

If you are interested in mental health, accelerated online pmhnp programs prepare nurses to deliver psychiatric care. These advanced degrees are designed for working professionals eager to address the growing need for mental health practitioners.

Beyond clinical roles, online healthcare administration programs equip students with managerial skills for hospital, clinic, and system leadership. Affordable online options make it easier to pursue impactful careers behind the scenes in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Michael M. Engelgau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles