World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 61 2713 2590 1084 1004 140 19663

Matthew J. Eckelman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew J. Eckelman between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew J. Eckelman published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2025. 39 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 19 publications 2025: 20 publications
2007 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew J. Eckelman: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 7
2013 8
2014 10
2015 10
2016 10
2017 6
2018 10
2019 9
2020 12
2021 13
2022 8
2023 13
2024 19
2025 20
Total 173
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Eckelman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Eckelman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 140
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew J. Eckelman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew J. Eckelman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152 61
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew J. Eckelman is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with a significant body of work exploring the intersections between climate change and health impacts.

Their research spans several key topics, including:

  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Healthcare and Environmental Waste Management
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Building Energy and Comfort Optimization

Within environmental science, Eckelman has contributed extensively to subfields such as:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • General Health Professions
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Building and Construction
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

They have published numerous papers in various reputable venues, with frequent publications in:

  • The Lancet
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • The Lancet Planetary Health
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some of their recent papers include:

  • The 2023 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for a health-centred response in a world facing irreversible harms, 2023, The Lancet
  • The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels, 2022, The Lancet
  • The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future, 2021, The Lancet
  • Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises, 2020, The Lancet

Eckelman has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Jodi D. Sherman
  • Marina Romanello
  • Ian Hamilton
  • Julie B. Zimmerman
  • Niheer Dasandi

In addition to journal articles, Eckelman has contributed to book publications, notably two editions of Industrial Ecology and Sustainability published by World Scientific in 2023 and 2024.

Best Publications

  • The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: health at the mercy of fossil fuels

    Unknown

  • The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises.

    Nick Watts;Markus Amann;Nigel Arnell;Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson

  • The 2019 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate

    Nick Watts;Markus Amann;Nigel Arnell;Sonja Ayeb-Karlsson

  • The 2021 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: code red for a healthy future.

    Marina Romanello;Alice McGushin;Claudia Di Napoli;Paul Drummond

  • Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public Health

    Matthew J. Eckelman;Jodi Sherman

  • Life Cycle Assessment of Metals: A Scientific Synthesis

    Philip Nuss;Matthew J. Eckelman

  • Health Care Pollution And Public Health Damage In The United States: An Update.

    Matthew J Eckelman;Kaixin Huang;Robert Lagasse;Emily Senay

  • Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of anesthetic drugs.

    Jodi Sherman;Cathy Le;Vanessa Lamers;Matthew Eckelman

  • Combinatorial life cycle assessment to inform process design of industrial production of algal biodiesel

    Laura B. Brentner;Matthew J. Eckelman;Julie B. Zimmerman

  • Environmental Impacts of Surgical Procedures: Life Cycle Assessment of Hysterectomy in the United States

    Cassandra L. Thiel;Matthew Eckelman;Richard Guido;Matthew Huddleston

  • Life cycle environmental emissions and health damages from the Canadian healthcare system: An economic-environmental-epidemiological analysis

    Matthew J. Eckelman;Jodi D. Sherman;Andrea J. MacNeill

  • The Green Print: Advancement of Environmental Sustainability in Healthcare

    Jodi D. Sherman;Cassandra Thiel;Andrea MacNeill;Matthew J. Eckelman

  • Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States

    John Quale;Matthew J. Eckelman;Kyle W. Williams;Greg Sloditskie

  • Estimated Global Disease Burden From US Health Care Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions.

    Matthew J. Eckelman;Jodi D. Sherman

  • Predictive modeling for US commercial building energy use: A comparison of existing statistical and machine learning algorithms using CBECS microdata

    Hengfang Deng;David Fannon;Matthew J. Eckelman

  • Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.

    Jodi D. Sherman;Lewis A. Raibley;Matthew J. Eckelman

  • New perspectives on nanomaterial aquatic ecotoxicity: production impacts exceed direct exposure impacts for carbon nanotoubes.

    Matthew J. Eckelman;Meagan S. Mauter;Jacqueline A. Isaacs;Menachem Elimelech

  • Transforming The Medical Device Industry: Road Map To A Circular Economy

    Andrea J. MacNeill;Harriet Hopf;Aman Khanuja;Saed Alizamir

  • Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.

    Matthew Eckelman;Margo Mosher;Andres Gonzalez;Jodi Sherman

  • Toward Green Nano

    Matthew J. Eckelman;Julie B. Zimmerman;Paul T. Anastas

  • Silver emissions and their environmental impacts: a multilevel assessment.

    Matthew J. Eckelman;T. E. Graedel

  • Consequential environmental and economic life cycle assessment of green and gray stormwater infrastructures for combined sewer systems.

    Ranran Wang;Matthew J. Eckelman;Julie B. Zimmerman

Frequent Co-Authors

Julie B. Zimmerman
Julie B. Zimmerman Yale University
Thomas E. Graedel
Thomas E. Graedel Yale University
Paul T. Anastas
Paul T. Anastas Yale University
Robert Dubrow
Robert Dubrow Yale University
Ian Hamilton
Ian Hamilton University College London
April Z. Gu
April Z. Gu Cornell University
Kris A. Murray
Kris A. Murray Imperial College London
Anthony Costello
Anthony Costello University College London
Tadj Oreszczyn
Tadj Oreszczyn University College London
Nigel W. Arnell
Nigel W. Arnell University of Reading

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary fields. Many students complement their science background with social sciences, making online sociology bachelor programs a valuable option. These programs help build a deeper understanding of societal impacts on the environment.

For those interested in education and policy advocacy within environmental topics, earning advanced degrees is crucial. Programs like education doctoral programs without dissertation offer flexible paths for professionals balancing work and study. These programs equip graduates to influence environmental education and community outreach.

Students aiming to further elevate their expertise might consider eds to edd programs online, which provide a seamless transition from a master’s level education degree to a doctorate. This pathway enhances leadership skills applicable to environmental leadership roles.

Finally, careers in social welfare linked to environmental justice can benefit from specialized degrees such as dsw programs. These programs prepare professionals for advanced social work roles addressing environmental and community health challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew J. Eckelman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles