World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5027
World Ranking
550
National Ranking
303

Mary K. Feeney publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary K. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 136 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Mary K. Feeney D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary K. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

Mary K. Feeney is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has a significant research presence in the social sciences. Their work primarily spans areas such as sociology, political science, international relations, public administration, communication, and strategy and management.

The main topics of their research focus on e-government and public services, public policy and administration research, social media and politics, privacy, security, and data protection, as well as the nonprofit sector and volunteering. Additional interests include crime patterns and interventions, and higher education governance and development.

Feeney's recent published papers include:

  • The Limits of Social Media for Public Administration Research and Practice (2020) in Public Administration Review
  • Formalization and Administrative Burden as Obstacles to Employee Recruitment: Consequences for the Public Sector (2020) in Review of Public Personnel Administration
  • Cybersecurity Threats in Local Government: A Sociotechnical Perspective (2022) in The American Review of Public Administration
  • COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time (2022) in PLoS ONE
  • COVID-19 and the academy: opinions and experiences of university-based scientists in the U.S. (2021) in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Frequent co-authors of Feeney include Eric W. Welch, Ashlee Frandell, Timothy P. Johnson, Mattia Caldarulo, and Lesley Michalegko.

The scientist has consistently published in venues such as The American Review of Public Administration, Public Administration Review, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Government Information Quarterly, and Public Administration.

Mary K. Feeney has been recognized as a Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring A Conceptual Analysis and Critique

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Rules and red tape : a prism for public administration theory and research

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments

    Stephan G. Grimmelikhuijsen;Mary K. Feeney

  • Family-Friendly Policies, Gender, and Work–Life Balance in the Public Sector:

    Mary K. Feeney;Justin M. Stritch

  • Personnel Flexibility and Red Tape in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Distinctions Due to Institutional and Political Accountability

    Mary K. Feeney;Hal G. Rainey

  • Mentor Matching: A ‘Goodness of Fit’ Model

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments: Distinguishing Between E-Services and Communication Technologies

    Meng Hao Li;Mary K. Feeney

  • Stakeholder Red Tape: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Their Private Consultants

    Mary K. Feeney;Barry Bozeman

  • Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers

    Mary K. Feeney;Eric W. Welch

  • Mentoring and network ties

    Mary K. Feeney;Barry Bozeman

  • Sector Perceptions among State-Level Public Managers

    Mary K. Feeney

  • Organizational Red Tape: A Measurement Experiment

    Mary K. Feeney

  • Technology–Task Coupling:Exploring Social Media Use and Managerial Perceptions of E-Government

    Mary K. Feeney;Eric W. Welch

  • Technology in government: How organizational culture mediates information and communication technology outcomes

    Eric W. Welch;Mary K. Feeney

  • Are small cities online? Content, ranking, and variation of U.S. municipal websites

    Mary K. Feeney;Adrian Brown

  • Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Municipalities

    Shu Wang;Mary K. Feeney

  • Public Management Mentoring: What Affects Outcomes?

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Determinants of data sharing in U.S. city governments

    Eric W. Welch;Mary K. Feeney;Chul Hyun Park

  • Bureaucracy and Public Employee Behavior: A Case of Local Government

    Mary K. Feeney;Leisha DeHart-Davis

  • Factors Attracting Individuals to Nonprofit Management over Public and Private Sector Management

    Kelly LeRoux;Mary K. Feeney

  • Formal institutions, informal institutions, and red tape: A comparative study

    Wesley Kaufmann;Reggy Hooghiemstra;Mary K. Feeney

  • Public Management Mentoring: A Three-Tier Model

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Social Media in the Workplace: Information Exchange, Productivity, or Waste?:

    Federica Fusi;Mary K. Feeney

  • The Limits of Social Media for Public Administration Research and Practice

    Mary K. Feeney;Gregory Porumbescu;Gregory Porumbescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric W. Welch
Eric W. Welch Arizona State University
Barry Bozeman
Barry Bozeman Arizona State University
Kelly LeRoux
Kelly LeRoux University of Illinois at Chicago
Timothy P. Johnson
Timothy P. Johnson University of Illinois at Chicago
Hal G. Rainey
Hal G. Rainey University of Georgia
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of careers—some directly linked to government and policy, others in rapidly evolving fields like environmental advocacy. If you want to quickly boost your qualifications, consider quick certificate programs that can complement your Political Science background and lead to well-paying roles.

For students aiming to advance their education in less time, there are quick masters degrees available online that can help you specialize and become more competitive in the job market. Additionally, exploring cheap online colleges allows you to access accredited programs without taking on significant debt.

Career options for Political Science graduates are diverse, ranging from public policy and law to business and non-profits. Those interested in interdisciplinary work may find inspiration in how what careers can you get with environmental science reflects emerging opportunities at the intersection of policy and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Mary K. Feeney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles