World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 39 550 500 303 262 136 5027

Mary K. Feeney publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mary K. Feeney between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mary K. Feeney published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 57 publications in 2015. 6 of the 279 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 57. Peak 57 publications in 2015. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 51 publications 2015: 57 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications
1980 2025

279 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mary K. Feeney: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 1
2007 5
2008 7
2009 9
2010 10
2011 12
2012 7
2013 7
2014 51
2015 57
2016 9
2017 15
2018 16
2019 7
2020 13
2021 13
2022 6
2023 4
2024 4
2025 2
Total 279
Download as CSV

Mary K. Feeney publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary K. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 136–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 136 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45 136
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Mary K. Feeney D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary K. Feeney sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40 39
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration
  • Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration

Overview

Mary K. Feeney is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and has a significant research presence in the social sciences. Their work primarily spans areas such as sociology, political science, international relations, public administration, communication, and strategy and management.

The main topics of their research focus on e-government and public services, public policy and administration research, social media and politics, privacy, security, and data protection, as well as the nonprofit sector and volunteering. Additional interests include crime patterns and interventions, and higher education governance and development.

Feeney's recent published papers include:

  • The Limits of Social Media for Public Administration Research and Practice (2020) in Public Administration Review
  • Formalization and Administrative Burden as Obstacles to Employee Recruitment: Consequences for the Public Sector (2020) in Review of Public Personnel Administration
  • Cybersecurity Threats in Local Government: A Sociotechnical Perspective (2022) in The American Review of Public Administration
  • COVID-19 and gender inequity in science: Consistent harm over time (2022) in PLoS ONE
  • COVID-19 and the academy: opinions and experiences of university-based scientists in the U.S. (2021) in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications

Frequent co-authors of Feeney include Eric W. Welch, Ashlee Frandell, Timothy P. Johnson, Mattia Caldarulo, and Lesley Michalegko.

The scientist has consistently published in venues such as The American Review of Public Administration, Public Administration Review, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Government Information Quarterly, and Public Administration.

Mary K. Feeney has been recognized as a Fellow of The National Academy of Public Administration.

Best Publications

  • Toward a Useful Theory of Mentoring A Conceptual Analysis and Critique

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Rules and red tape : a prism for public administration theory and research

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Developing and Testing an Integrative Framework for Open Government Adoption in Local Governments

    Stephan G. Grimmelikhuijsen;Mary K. Feeney

  • Family-Friendly Policies, Gender, and Work–Life Balance in the Public Sector:

    Mary K. Feeney;Justin M. Stritch

  • Personnel Flexibility and Red Tape in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Distinctions Due to Institutional and Political Accountability

    Mary K. Feeney;Hal G. Rainey

  • Mentor Matching: A ‘Goodness of Fit’ Model

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Adoption of Electronic Technologies in Local U.S. Governments: Distinguishing Between E-Services and Communication Technologies

    Meng Hao Li;Mary K. Feeney

  • Stakeholder Red Tape: Comparing Perceptions of Public Managers and Their Private Consultants

    Mary K. Feeney;Barry Bozeman

  • Electronic Participation Technologies and Perceived Outcomes for Local Government Managers

    Mary K. Feeney;Eric W. Welch

  • Mentoring and network ties

    Mary K. Feeney;Barry Bozeman

  • Sector Perceptions among State-Level Public Managers

    Mary K. Feeney

  • Organizational Red Tape: A Measurement Experiment

    Mary K. Feeney

  • Technology–Task Coupling:Exploring Social Media Use and Managerial Perceptions of E-Government

    Mary K. Feeney;Eric W. Welch

  • Technology in government: How organizational culture mediates information and communication technology outcomes

    Eric W. Welch;Mary K. Feeney

  • Are small cities online? Content, ranking, and variation of U.S. municipal websites

    Mary K. Feeney;Adrian Brown

  • Determinants of Information and Communication Technology Adoption in Municipalities

    Shu Wang;Mary K. Feeney

  • Public Management Mentoring: What Affects Outcomes?

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Determinants of data sharing in U.S. city governments

    Eric W. Welch;Mary K. Feeney;Chul Hyun Park

  • Bureaucracy and Public Employee Behavior: A Case of Local Government

    Mary K. Feeney;Leisha DeHart-Davis

  • Factors Attracting Individuals to Nonprofit Management over Public and Private Sector Management

    Kelly LeRoux;Mary K. Feeney

  • Formal institutions, informal institutions, and red tape: A comparative study

    Wesley Kaufmann;Reggy Hooghiemstra;Mary K. Feeney

  • Public Management Mentoring: A Three-Tier Model

    Barry Bozeman;Mary K. Feeney

  • Social Media in the Workplace: Information Exchange, Productivity, or Waste?:

    Federica Fusi;Mary K. Feeney

  • The Limits of Social Media for Public Administration Research and Practice

    Mary K. Feeney;Gregory Porumbescu;Gregory Porumbescu

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric W. Welch
Eric W. Welch Arizona State University
Barry Bozeman
Barry Bozeman Arizona State University
Kelly LeRoux
Kelly LeRoux University of Illinois at Chicago
Timothy P. Johnson
Timothy P. Johnson University of Illinois at Chicago
Hal G. Rainey
Hal G. Rainey University of Georgia
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen
Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA can open doors to a variety of careers—some directly linked to government and policy, others in rapidly evolving fields like environmental advocacy. If you want to quickly boost your qualifications, consider quick certificate programs that can complement your Political Science background and lead to well-paying roles.

For students aiming to advance their education in less time, there are quick masters degrees available online that can help you specialize and become more competitive in the job market. Additionally, exploring cheap online colleges allows you to access accredited programs without taking on significant debt.

Career options for Political Science graduates are diverse, ranging from public policy and law to business and non-profits. Those interested in interdisciplinary work may find inspiration in how what careers can you get with environmental science reflects emerging opportunities at the intersection of policy and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Mary K. Feeney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles