World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
19709
World Ranking
2169
National Ranking
882

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
67
Citations
20655
World Ranking
1276
National Ranking
415

Larry W. Lake publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry W. Lake sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 404 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Larry W. Lake D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry W. Lake sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 67 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Larry W. Lake is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research focuses on engineering, with a primary emphasis on subfields such as ocean engineering, mechanical engineering, environmental engineering, mechanics of materials, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The scientist's work covers key topics, including:

  • Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis
  • Oil and Gas Production Techniques
  • Drilling and Well Engineering

Recent papers by Larry W. Lake include:

  • On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 - Enhanced oil recovery, 2020, Applied Energy
  • Comparison of permeability predictions on cemented sandstones with physics-based and machine learning approaches, 2020, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
  • Multiscale spatial analysis of fracture arrangement and pattern reconstruction using Ripley's K-function, 2022, Journal of Structural Geology
  • Buoyant Flow of H2 Vs. CO2 in Storage Aquifers: Implications to Geological Screening, 2023, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
  • The Physical Meaning of the Koval Factor, 2020, Mathematical Geosciences

Larry W. Lake frequently collaborates with several coauthors. Notable collaborators include:

  • Mark P. Walsh
  • Leopoldo M. Ruiz Maraggi
  • Frank Male
  • Jerry L. Jensen
  • Michael J. Pyrcz

The scientist has contributed extensively to publications in venues such as:

  • SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
  • SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering
  • SPE Journal
  • Geoenergy Science and Engineering
  • Proceedings of the 9th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference

Best Publications

  • Enhanced Oil Recovery

    Larry W. Lake

  • Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil Recovery

    LW Lake;RT Johns;WR Rossen;GA Pope

  • Reservoir Simulation of CO 2 Storage in Aquifers

    Ajitabh Kumar;Myeong H. Noh;Robin C. Ozah;Gary A. Pope

  • Reservoir Simulation of CO2 Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers

    A. Kumar;M. Noh;G.A. Pope;K. Sepehrnoori

  • A Capacitance Model To Infer Interwell Connectivity From Production and Injection Rate Fluctuations

    Ali A. Yousef;Pablo H. Gentil;Jerry L. Jensen;Larry W. Lake

  • Inferring Interwell Connectivity Only From Well-Rate Fluctuations in Waterfloods

    Alejandro Albertoni;Larry W. Lake

  • Dispersion and Reservoir Heterogeneity

    Atul Arya;Tom A. Hewett;Ronald G. Larson;Larry W. Lake

  • Stability of aqueous silica nanoparticle dispersions

    Cigdem O. Metin;Larry W Lake;Caetano R. Miranda;Quoc Phuc Nguyen

  • A New Approach to Shale Management in Field-Scale Models

    Helge H. Haldorsen;Larry W. Lake

  • The use of capacitance–resistance models for rapid estimation of waterflood performance and optimization

    M. Sayarpour;M. Sayarpour;E. Zuluaga;C.S. Kabir;Larry W. Lake

  • Scaling immiscible flow through permeable media by inspectional analysis

    Mike Shook;Dachang Li;Larry W Lake

  • Reservoir Characterization II

    Larry W. Lake;Herbert B. Carroll;Thomas C. Wesson

  • Estimation of Single-Phase Permeability from Parameters of Particle-Size Distribution

    Manmath N. Panda;Larry W. Lake

  • Production Forecasting with Logistic Growth Models

    Aaron James Clark;Larry Wayne Lake;Tadeusz Wiktor Patzek

  • Pattern analysis of dune-field parameters

    Ryan C. Ewing;Gary Kocurek;Larry W. Lake

  • Precipitation and dissolution of solids attending flow through porous media

    M. P. Walsh;S. L. Bryant;R. S. Schechter;L. W. Lake

  • On the sustainability of CO2 storage through CO2 – Enhanced oil recovery

    R. Farajzadeh;A.A. Eftekhari;G. Dafnomilis;L.W. Lake

  • A Coreflood Investigation of Low-Salinity Enhanced Oil Recovery

    Scott M Rivet;Larry W. Lake;Gary A Pope

  • A theoretical and experimental analysis of minipermeameter response including gas slippage and high velocity flow effects

    David J. Goggin;Richard L. Thrasher;Larry W. Lake

  • Stochastic Reservoir Modeling Using Simulated Annealing and Genetic Algorithm

    M.K. Sen;Akhil Datta-Gupta;P.L. Stoffa;L.W. Lake

  • Reservoir heterogeneities and their influence on ultimate recovery.

    Thomas J. Lasseter;John R. Waggoner;Larry W. Lake

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Bryant
Steven L. Bryant University of Calgary
Gary A. Pope
Gary A. Pope The University of Texas at Austin
Jerry L. Jensen
Jerry L. Jensen The University of Texas at Austin
Russell T. Johns
Russell T. Johns Pennsylvania State University
Gary Kocurek
Gary Kocurek The University of Texas at Austin
Kamy Sepehrnoori
Kamy Sepehrnoori The University of Texas at Austin
Mojdeh Delshad
Mojdeh Delshad The University of Texas at Austin
Thomas F. Edgar
Thomas F. Edgar The University of Texas at Austin
Leon S. Lasdon
Leon S. Lasdon The University of Texas at Austin
Akhil Datta-Gupta
Akhil Datta-Gupta Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA can open doors to a range of dynamic careers. However, a multidisciplinary approach, supported by complementary online degrees, can boost your professional options and open unexpected pathways.

For those interested in the people and project management side of engineering, the cheapest online masters in human resources offers a strong foundation in recruitment, organizational development, and leadership—skills that are highly valued in tech environments.

Effective communication is another critical skill in the tech industry. Consider an online master of communications to learn how to relay complex technical ideas to a wider audience, enhance team collaboration, and drive innovation.

If your career ambitions include launching a startup or leading a business, then online mba entrepreneurship programs provide the business acumen and practical insights needed for success in the ever-evolving tech landscape. For those seeking a faster path, the 1 year online mba no gmat lets you earn your credentials quickly—no GMAT required.

These alternative online degree options can complement your engineering or technology background and help you adapt to diverse roles in today's competitive job market.

Best Scientists Citing Larry W. Lake

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles