What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary scientific interests are in Law, Constitutional law, Politics, Judicial review and Judicial activism.
His Law study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Law and economics.
His research investigates the link between Constitutional law and topics such as Human rights that cross with problems in Constitutionalism and Civil liberties.
The concepts of his Politics study are interwoven with issues in Public interest, Public interest law and Litigation strategy.
His biological study deals with issues like Horizontal effect, which deal with fields such as Social Welfare and Legislature.
His Judicial activism study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Persistence, Judicial independence, Separation of powers, Judicial branch and Democracy.
His most cited work include:
- And We Are Not Saved: The Elusive Quest for Racial Justice (357 citations)
- Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts (281 citations)
- Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (140 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Law, Constitution, Constitutional law, Law and economics and Supreme court.
Politics, Judicial review, Public law, Comparative law and Judicial activism are the core of his Law study.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Judicial independence and Judicial activism.
His research on Constitution frequently links to adjacent areas such as Democracy.
He is interested in Constitutional economics, which is a field of Constitutional law.
His research on Law and economics often connects related areas such as Constitutionalism.
He most often published in these fields:
- Law (63.89%)
- Constitution (18.94%)
- Constitutional law (17.17%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Law (63.89%)
- Law and economics (16.41%)
- Constitutional law (17.17%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Law, Law and economics, Constitutional law, Constitution and Politics.
His study ties his expertise on Argument together with the subject of Law.
His research integrates issues of Rule of law, Judicial review, Social science, Proportionality and Human rights in his study of Law and economics.
The various areas that Mark Tushnet examines in his Constitutional law study include Scholarship, Legislature, Constitutional review and Interpretation.
He studied Constitution and Democracy that intersect with Separation of powers.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Public law, Comparative law are connected with Ancient history and Economic history and other disciplines.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Peasants with pitchforks, and toilers with Twitter Constitutional revolutions and the constituent power (15 citations)
- Advanced Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law (14 citations)
- Proportionality: New Frontiers, New Challenges (11 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Mark Tushnet spends much of his time researching Law, Constitutional law, Law and economics, Politics and Constitution.
While working in this field, he studies both Law and Historical memory.
In his study, Code, Interpretation, National government and Partisan politics is inextricably linked to Legislature, which falls within the broad field of Constitutional law.
His Law and economics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Municipal law, Comparative law, Public law, Constitutional review and Proportionality.
Mark Tushnet combines subjects such as National security, Social movement and Civil society with his study of Constitution.
His research investigates the connection between Constitutionalism and topics such as Relation that intersect with issues in Judicial review, Veto, Liberalism and Populism.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
