World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
13787
World Ranking
4396
National Ranking
1634

Mark DeMaria publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark DeMaria sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 142 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark DeMaria D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark DeMaria sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark DeMaria is affiliated with Colorado State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant emphasis on Atmospheric Science and related subfields.

Their main research topics include:

  • Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
  • Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Geological and Geophysical Studies

Mark DeMaria has contributed to multiple publications with a focus on tropical cyclones and forecasting methodologies. Notable recent papers include:

  • Operational Forecasting of Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification at the National Hurricane Center, 2021, Atmosphere
  • The National Hurricane Center Tropical Cyclone Model Guidance Suite, 2022, Weather and Forecasting
  • Recent Progress in Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting at the National Hurricane Center, 2020, Weather and Forecasting
  • Applying Satellite Observations of Tropical Cyclone Internal Structures to Rapid Intensification Forecast With Machine Learning, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • 2020 HFIP R&D Activities Summary: Recent Results and Operational Implementation, 2021, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) - NOAA Central Library

Their publication record shows strong engagement with several academic venues. The most frequent publication sources include:

  • Weather and Forecasting
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Atmosphere
  • Tropical Cyclone Research and Review
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Collaborations have been notable with a range of coauthors, including:

  • Galina Chirokova
  • Kate D. Musgrave
  • James L. Franklin
  • Alan Brammer
  • John A. Knaff

Best Publications

  • Large-Scale Characteristics of Rapidly Intensifying Tropical Cyclones in the North Atlantic Basin

    John Kaplan;Mark Demaria

  • Further improvements to the Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS)

    Mark DeMaria;Michelle Mainelli;Lynn K. Shay;John A. Knaff

  • The Effect of Vertical Shear on Tropical Cyclone Intensity Change

    Mark DeMaria

  • A Revised Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification Index for the Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific Basins

    John Kaplan;Mark DeMaria;John A. Knaff

  • A Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic Basin

    Mark DeMaria;John Kaplan

  • Prediction of Landfalling Hurricanes with the Advanced Hurricane WRF Model

    Christopher Davis;Wei Wang;Shuyi S. Chen;Yongsheng Chen

  • Is Tropical Cyclone Intensity Guidance Improving

    Mark DeMaria;Charles R. Sampson;John A. Knaff;Kate D. Musgrave

  • An Updated Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) for the Atlantic and Eastern North Pacific Basins

    Mark DeMaria;John Kaplan

  • Sea Surface Temperature and the Maximum Intensity of Atlantic Tropical Cyclones

    Mark Demaria;John Kaplan

  • Evaluation of Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit Tropical-Cyclone Intensity and Size Estimation Algorithms

    Julie L. Demuth;Mark Demaria;John A. Knaff;Thomas H. Vonder Haar

  • A Simple Empirical Model for Predicting the Decay of Tropical Cyclone Winds after Landfall

    John Kaplan;Mark DeMaria

  • A Tropical Cyclone Genesis Parameter for the Tropical Atlantic

    Mark DeMaria;John A. Knaff;Bernadette H. Connell

  • Application of Oceanic Heat Content Estimation to Operational Forecasting of Recent Atlantic Category 5 Hurricanes

    Michelle M. Mainelli;Mark DeMaria;Lynn K. Shay;Gustavo Goni

  • Satellite Analysis of Tropical Cyclones Using the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit (AMSU).

    Stanley Q. Kidder;Mitchell D. Goldberg;Raymond M. Zehr;Mark DeMaria

  • Large-Scale Response of the Tropical Atmosphere to Transient Convection

    Pedro L. Silva Dias;Wayne H. Schubert;Mark DeMaria

  • An Operational Statistical Typhoon Intensity Prediction Scheme for the Western North Pacific

    John A. Knaff;Charles R. Sampson;Mark DeMaria

  • Evaluating Environmental Impacts on Tropical Cyclone Rapid Intensification Predictability Utilizing Statistical Models

    John Kaplan;Christopher M. Rozoff;Mark DeMaria;Charles R. Sampson

  • Recent Progress in Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasting at the National Hurricane Center

    John P. Cangialosi;Eric Blake;Mark DeMaria;Andrew Penny

  • Upper-level eddy angular momentum fluxes and tropical cyclone intensity change

    Mark Demaria;Jong-Jin Baik;John Kaplan

  • Statistical Tropical Cyclone Wind Radii Prediction Using Climatology and Persistence

    John A. Knaff;Charles R. Sampson;Mark Demaria;Timothy P. Marchok

  • Statistical, 5-Day Tropical Cyclone Intensity Forecasts Derived from Climatology and Persistence

    John A. Knaff;Mark DeMaria;Charles R. Sampson;James M. Gross

  • NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE Improvement of Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit Tropical Cyclone Intensity and Size Estimation Algorithms

    Julie L. Demuth;Mark Demaria;John A. Knaff

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Knaff
John A. Knaff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Wayne H. Schubert
Wayne H. Schubert Colorado State University
Christopher S. Velden
Christopher S. Velden Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies
Frank D. Marks
Frank D. Marks National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ralf Bennartz
Ralf Bennartz Vanderbilt University
Jun A. Zhang
Jun A. Zhang University of Miami
James P. Kossin
James P. Kossin University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert Atlas
Robert Atlas Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory
Lynn K. Shay
Lynn K. Shay University of Miami
Robert F. Rogers
Robert F. Rogers Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge beyond environmental sciences, numerous online degree options provide flexible learning opportunities and career advancement. Many professionals consider bridge programs, such as eds to edd bridge programs online, which allow educators or researchers to transition smoothly into doctoral studies while continuing their careers.

Social work is another complementary field, especially for those passionate about community and environmental justice. Affordable options like dsw programs offer practical knowledge to influence policy and promote sustainable social change.

Alternatively, if a broader educational background is sought, students might explore versatile options such as the best affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs foster critical thinking and adaptability, valuable traits in interdisciplinary environmental careers.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly or as a stepping stone to advanced degrees, exploring the easiest degree to get can be a practical approach without compromising quality. This path can help jumpstart a career in environmental management, policy, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark DeMaria

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles