World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7517
World Ranking
6128
National Ranking
92

Mari Pihlatie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Pihlatie sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Mari Pihlatie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Pihlatie sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mari Pihlatie is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland, focusing on research within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, notably Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Soil Science, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's research covers a broad range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, soil and plant interactions, and ecosystem processes. Major topics include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Pihlatie has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • New Phytologist
  • Biogeosciences
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Pihlatie include:

  • Soil greenhouse gas emissions from afforested organic soil croplands and cutaway peatlands, 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Design considerations, 2020, Journal of Environmental Quality
  • New insight to the role of microbes in the methane exchange in trees: evidence from metagenomic sequencing, 2021, New Phytologist
  • Potential of Biochar to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Boreal Arable Soils in the Long-Term, 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Carbon-nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation - Part 1: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling, 2020, Biogeosciences

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues including:

  • Markku Koskinen
  • Lukas Kohl
  • Anuliina Putkinen
  • Salla Tenhovirta
  • Annalea Lohila

Best Publications

  • Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux

    Jukka Pumpanen;Pasi Kolari;Hannu Ilvesniemi;Kari Minkkinen

  • Nitrous oxide emissions following application of residues and fertiliser under zero and conventional tillage

    Elizabeth Baggs;M. Stevenson;M. Pihlatie;A. Regar

  • Annual cycle of methane emission from a boreal fen measured by the eddy covariance technique

    Janne Rinne;Terhi Riutta;Mari Pihlatie;Mika Aurela

  • Comparison of static chambers to measure CH4 emissions from soils

    Mari K. Pihlatie;Jesper Riis Christiansen;Jesper Riis Christiansen;Hermanni Aaltonen;Hermanni Aaltonen;Janne F.J. Korhonen

  • Factors controlling regional differences in forest soil emission of nitrogen oxides (NO and N 2 O)

    K. Pilegaard;U. Skiba;P. Ambus;C. Beier

  • Inventories of N2O and NO Emissions from European Forest Soils

    M. Kesik;P. Ambus;R. Baritz;N. Brüggemann

  • Sulphuric acid closure and contribution to nucleation mode particle growth

    M. Boy;M. Kulmala;T. M. Ruuskanen;M. Pihlatie

  • Plant roots increase both decomposition and stable organic matter formation in boreal forest soil.

    Bartosz Adamczyk;Outi-Maaria Sietiö;Petra Straková;Judith Prommer

  • Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O production in peat, clay and loamy sand soils under different soil moisture conditions

    Mari Pihlatie;Eija Syväsalo;Asko Simojoki;Martti Esala

  • Boreal pine forest floor biogenic volatile organic compound emissions peak in early summer and autumn

    Hermanni Aaltonen;Jukka Pumpanen;Mari Pihlatie;Hannele Hakola

  • Spatial variation in plant community functions regulates carbon gas dynamics in a boreal fen ecosystem

    T. Riutta;J. Laine;M. Aurela;J. Rinne

  • Methane emissions from tree stems: a new frontier in the global carbon cycle.

    Josep Barba;Mark A Bradford;Paul E Brewer;Dan Bruhn

  • Assessing the effects of chamber placement, manual sampling and headspace mixing on CH4 fluxes in a laboratory experiment

    Jesper Riis Christiansen;Janne F. J. Korhonen;Radoslaw Juszczak;Michael Giebels

  • Standardisation of chamber technique for CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes measurements from terrestrial ecosystems

    Marian Pavelka;Manuel Acosta;Ralf Kiese;Núria Altimir

  • Pinus sylvestris as a missing source of nitrous oxide and methane in boreal forest

    Katerina Machacova;Jaana Bäck;Anni Vanhatalo;Elisa Halmeenmäki

  • Temporal Variation of Ecosystem Scale Methane Emission From a Boreal Fen in Relation to Temperature, Water Table Position, and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes

    Janne Rinne;Eeva Stiina Tuittila;Olli Peltola;Xuefei Li

  • Nitrous oxide emissions from a municipal landfill.

    Janne Rinne;Mari Pihlatie;Annalea Lohila;Tea Thum

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gases at the NitroEurope core flux measurement sites: measurement strategy and first data sets

    U. Skiba;J. Drewer;Y.S. Tang;N. Van Dijk

  • Gas concentration driven fluxes of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide in boreal forest soil

    M. Pihlatie;J. Pumpanen;J. Rinne;H. Ilvesniemi;H. Ilvesniemi

  • Soil greenhouse gas emissions from afforested organic soil croplands and cutaway peatlands

    Päivi Mäkiranta;Jyrki Hytönen;Lasse Aro;Marja Maljanen

  • Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill.

    Annalea Lohila;Tuomas Laurila;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen;Mika Aurela

Frequent Co-Authors

Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Jukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen University of Eastern Finland
Janne Rinne
Janne Rinne Lund University
Ivan Mammarella
Ivan Mammarella University of Helsinki
Pertti Hari
Pertti Hari University of Helsinki
Mika Aurela
Mika Aurela Finnish Meteorological Institute
Jaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck University of Helsinki
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki
Annalea Lohila
Annalea Lohila Finnish Meteorological Institute
Pasi Kolari
Pasi Kolari University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education beyond a bachelor’s in Environmental Sciences, exploring accredited eds to edd programs offers a strong foundation for leadership roles in academia, policy, or research. These programs provide rigorous training while accommodating working professionals through online formats.

Social work also intersects with environmental concerns, especially in community resilience and sustainability efforts. Looking into fully funded dsw programs can open pathways to impactful careers focused on social justice and environmental equity, combining practical social care skills with advanced research.

For those seeking flexible options, an affordable online general studies degree can provide broad interdisciplinary knowledge, which is valuable in versatile roles related to environmental policy, education, and management.

Additionally, students starting their academic journey might consider the easiest bachelor degree programs online to build fundamental skills before specializing. This approach allows for gradual adaptation to college-level work while maintaining a manageable workload.

Overall, these diverse degree options support a wide range of career pathways within the environmental field, catering to different interests, budgets, and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Mari Pihlatie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles