World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 46 6128 5881 92 92 190 7517

Mari Pihlatie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mari Pihlatie between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mari Pihlatie published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2024. 41 of the 252 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2024. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 20 publications
2002 2025

252 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mari Pihlatie: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 8
2005 6
2006 7
2007 12
2008 8
2009 7
2010 5
2011 6
2012 2
2013 19
2014 11
2015 8
2016 15
2017 12
2018 13
2019 13
2020 13
2021 12
2022 11
2023 20
2024 21
2025 20
Total 252
Download as CSV

Mari Pihlatie publications per year - data summary

  • Mari Pihlatie, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Helsinki, has 252 publications recorded across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2002 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2024, with 21 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2002, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 10.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.5 per year counting only the 24 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 84 publications, 33% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2002-2009: 51 publications (6.4 per year); 2010-2017: 78 publications (9.8 per year); 2018-2025: 123 publications (15.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Mari Pihlatie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Pihlatie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 190 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400 190
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mari Pihlatie publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Mari Pihlatie, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Helsinki, records 190 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Mari Pihlatie, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Mari Pihlatie ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Mari Pihlatie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mari Pihlatie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291 46
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Mari Pihlatie D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Mari Pihlatie, a Environmental Sciences scholar from University of Helsinki, records 46 D-Index - the 39th percentile of the discipline.
  • 39% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Mari Pihlatie, and about 61% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Mari Pihlatie ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Mari Pihlatie is affiliated with the University of Helsinki in Finland, focusing on research within the field of Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, notably Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Soil Science, Atmospheric Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's research covers a broad range of topics related to atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, soil and plant interactions, and ecosystem processes. Major topics include:

  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Pihlatie has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • New Phytologist
  • Biogeosciences
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Helda (University of Helsinki)

Notable recent publications authored or co-authored by Pihlatie include:

  • Soil greenhouse gas emissions from afforested organic soil croplands and cutaway peatlands, 2024, Helda (University of Helsinki)
  • Global Research Alliance N2O chamber methodology guidelines: Design considerations, 2020, Journal of Environmental Quality
  • New insight to the role of microbes in the methane exchange in trees: evidence from metagenomic sequencing, 2021, New Phytologist
  • Potential of Biochar to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Increase Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Boreal Arable Soils in the Long-Term, 2022, Frontiers in Environmental Science
  • Carbon-nitrogen interactions in European forests and semi-natural vegetation - Part 1: Fluxes and budgets of carbon, nitrogen and greenhouse gases from ecosystem monitoring and modelling, 2020, Biogeosciences

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues including:

  • Markku Koskinen
  • Lukas Kohl
  • Anuliina Putkinen
  • Salla Tenhovirta
  • Annalea Lohila

Best Publications

  • Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil CO2 efflux

    Jukka Pumpanen;Pasi Kolari;Hannu Ilvesniemi;Kari Minkkinen

  • Nitrous oxide emissions following application of residues and fertiliser under zero and conventional tillage

    Elizabeth Baggs;M. Stevenson;M. Pihlatie;A. Regar

  • Annual cycle of methane emission from a boreal fen measured by the eddy covariance technique

    Janne Rinne;Terhi Riutta;Mari Pihlatie;Mika Aurela

  • Comparison of static chambers to measure CH4 emissions from soils

    Mari K. Pihlatie;Jesper Riis Christiansen;Jesper Riis Christiansen;Hermanni Aaltonen;Hermanni Aaltonen;Janne F.J. Korhonen

  • Factors controlling regional differences in forest soil emission of nitrogen oxides (NO and N 2 O)

    K. Pilegaard;U. Skiba;P. Ambus;C. Beier

  • Inventories of N2O and NO Emissions from European Forest Soils

    M. Kesik;P. Ambus;R. Baritz;N. Brüggemann

  • Sulphuric acid closure and contribution to nucleation mode particle growth

    M. Boy;M. Kulmala;T. M. Ruuskanen;M. Pihlatie

  • Plant roots increase both decomposition and stable organic matter formation in boreal forest soil.

    Bartosz Adamczyk;Outi-Maaria Sietiö;Petra Straková;Judith Prommer

  • Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to N2O production in peat, clay and loamy sand soils under different soil moisture conditions

    Mari Pihlatie;Eija Syväsalo;Asko Simojoki;Martti Esala

  • Boreal pine forest floor biogenic volatile organic compound emissions peak in early summer and autumn

    Hermanni Aaltonen;Jukka Pumpanen;Mari Pihlatie;Hannele Hakola

  • Spatial variation in plant community functions regulates carbon gas dynamics in a boreal fen ecosystem

    T. Riutta;J. Laine;M. Aurela;J. Rinne

  • Methane emissions from tree stems: a new frontier in the global carbon cycle.

    Josep Barba;Mark A Bradford;Paul E Brewer;Dan Bruhn

  • Assessing the effects of chamber placement, manual sampling and headspace mixing on CH4 fluxes in a laboratory experiment

    Jesper Riis Christiansen;Janne F. J. Korhonen;Radoslaw Juszczak;Michael Giebels

  • Standardisation of chamber technique for CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes measurements from terrestrial ecosystems

    Marian Pavelka;Manuel Acosta;Ralf Kiese;Núria Altimir

  • Pinus sylvestris as a missing source of nitrous oxide and methane in boreal forest

    Katerina Machacova;Jaana Bäck;Anni Vanhatalo;Elisa Halmeenmäki

  • Temporal Variation of Ecosystem Scale Methane Emission From a Boreal Fen in Relation to Temperature, Water Table Position, and Carbon Dioxide Fluxes

    Janne Rinne;Eeva Stiina Tuittila;Olli Peltola;Xuefei Li

  • Nitrous oxide emissions from a municipal landfill.

    Janne Rinne;Mari Pihlatie;Annalea Lohila;Tea Thum

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gases at the NitroEurope core flux measurement sites: measurement strategy and first data sets

    U. Skiba;J. Drewer;Y.S. Tang;N. Van Dijk

  • Gas concentration driven fluxes of nitrous oxide and carbon dioxide in boreal forest soil

    M. Pihlatie;J. Pumpanen;J. Rinne;H. Ilvesniemi;H. Ilvesniemi

  • Soil greenhouse gas emissions from afforested organic soil croplands and cutaway peatlands

    Päivi Mäkiranta;Jyrki Hytönen;Lasse Aro;Marja Maljanen

  • Micrometeorological measurements of methane and carbon dioxide fluxes at a municipal landfill.

    Annalea Lohila;Tuomas Laurila;Juha-Pekka Tuovinen;Mika Aurela

Frequent Co-Authors

Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Jukka Pumpanen
Jukka Pumpanen University of Eastern Finland
Janne Rinne
Janne Rinne Lund University
Ivan Mammarella
Ivan Mammarella University of Helsinki
Pertti Hari
Pertti Hari University of Helsinki
Mika Aurela
Mika Aurela Finnish Meteorological Institute
Jaana Bäck
Jaana Bäck University of Helsinki
Markku Kulmala
Markku Kulmala University of Helsinki
Annalea Lohila
Annalea Lohila Finnish Meteorological Institute
Pasi Kolari
Pasi Kolari University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education beyond a bachelor’s in Environmental Sciences, exploring accredited eds to edd programs offers a strong foundation for leadership roles in academia, policy, or research. These programs provide rigorous training while accommodating working professionals through online formats.

Social work also intersects with environmental concerns, especially in community resilience and sustainability efforts. Looking into fully funded dsw programs can open pathways to impactful careers focused on social justice and environmental equity, combining practical social care skills with advanced research.

For those seeking flexible options, an affordable online general studies degree can provide broad interdisciplinary knowledge, which is valuable in versatile roles related to environmental policy, education, and management.

Additionally, students starting their academic journey might consider the easiest bachelor degree programs online to build fundamental skills before specializing. This approach allows for gradual adaptation to college-level work while maintaining a manageable workload.

Overall, these diverse degree options support a wide range of career pathways within the environmental field, catering to different interests, budgets, and schedules.

Best Scientists Citing Mari Pihlatie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles