World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 45 4713 4358 2125 1947 219 7281

Mandy L. Ford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mandy L. Ford between 1972 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mandy L. Ford published across 55 years, from 1972 to 2026, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2016. 18 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2016. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1972 2026

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mandy L. Ford: publications per year, 1972 to 2026
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 2
2005 2
2006 2
2007 2
2008 4
2009 5
2010 4
2011 11
2012 11
2013 4
2014 20
2015 24
2016 27
2017 17
2018 13
2019 16
2020 16
2021 11
2022 5
2023 20
2024 8
2025 17
2026 1
Total 246
Download as CSV

Mandy L. Ford publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mandy L. Ford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 219 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158 219
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Mandy L. Ford D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mandy L. Ford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157 45
46–47 192
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mandy L. Ford is affiliated with Emory University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of immunology and microbiology, with a substantial focus on medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields including immunology, epidemiology, oncology, transplantation, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's research topics predominantly cover immune cell function and interaction, T-cell and B-cell immunology, immune response and inflammation, monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies research, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, immunotherapy and immune responses, as well as cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research.

Frequent publication venues where Mandy L. Ford's work appears include:

  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • The Journal of Immunology
  • JCI Insight
  • Shock
  • Frontiers in Immunology

Significant recent papers authored or co-authored by Mandy L. Ford include:

  • Signaling through the Inhibitory Fc Receptor FcγRIIB Induces CD8+ T Cell Apoptosis to Limit T Cell Immunity, 2020, Immunity
  • Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report, 2020, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Activation and regulation of alloreactive T cell immunity in solid organ transplantation, 2022, Nature Reviews Nephrology
  • Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Claudin-2 upregulation enhances intestinal permeability, immune activation, dysbiosis, and mortality in sepsis, 2024, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Mandy L. Ford has collaborated frequently with several co-authors throughout their research career. Some of their most frequent collaborators include:

  • Craig M. Coopersmith
  • Danya Liu
  • Zhe Liang
  • Kelsey B. Bennion
  • Ching-Wen Chen

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of human and non-human primate antibody binding to pig cells lacking GGTA1/CMAH/β4GalNT2 genes.

    Jose L. Estrada;Greg Martens;Ping Li;Andrew Adams;Andrew Adams

  • Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

    Anat R. Tambur;Patricia Campbell;Frans H. Claas;Sandy Feng

  • Mechanisms of Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Sepsis.

    Benyam P. Yoseph;Nathan J. Klingensmith;Zhe Liang;Elise R. Breed

  • Pre-transplant antibody screening and anti-CD154 costimulation blockade promote long-term xenograft survival in a pig-to-primate kidney transplant model.

    Laura Higginbotham;Dave Mathews;Cynthia A. Breeden;Mingqing Song

  • Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report.

    Anat R. Tambur;Patricia Campbell;Anita S. Chong;Sandy Feng

  • Specificity, magnitude, and kinetics of MOG-specific CD8+ T cell responses during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis

    Mandy L. Ford;Brian D. Evavold

  • The intestinal microenvironment in sepsis

    Katherine T. Fay;Mandy L. Ford;Craig M. Coopersmith

  • Targeting co-stimulatory pathways: transplantation and autoimmunity

    Mandy L. Ford;Andrew B. Adams;Thomas C. Pearson

  • Balancing Inflammation: The Link between Th17 and Regulatory T Cells.

    Maggie L. Diller;Ragini R. Kudchadkar;Keith A. Delman;David H. Lawson

  • Antigen-specific precursor frequency impacts T cell proliferation, differentiation, and requirement for costimulation

    Mandy L. Ford;Brent H. Koehn;Maylene E. Wagener;Wanhong Jiang

  • Selective targeting of human alloresponsive CD8+ effector memory T cells based on CD2 expression.

    Denise Jennifer Lo;T. A. Weaver;L. Stempora;Aneesh K Mehta

  • Translating costimulation blockade to the clinic: lessons learned from three pathways

    Mandy L. Ford;Christian P. Larsen

  • Cutting Edge: Rapamycin Augments Pathogen-Specific but Not Graft-Reactive CD8+ T Cell Responses

    Ivana R. Ferrer;Maylene E. Wagener;Jennifer M. Robertson;Alexa P. Turner

  • Age-Associated B Cells Express a Diverse Repertoire of VH and Vκ Genes with Somatic Hypermutation.

    Lisa M. Russell Knode;Martin S. Naradikian;Arpita Myles;Jean L. Scholz

  • LFA-1-specific therapy prolongs allograft survival in rhesus macaques

    Idelberto R. Badell;Maria C. Russell;Peter W. Thompson;Alexandra P. Turner

  • Antigen-specific induced Foxp3+ regulatory T cells are generated following CD40/CD154 blockade.

    Ivana R. Ferrer;Maylene E. Wagener;Minqing Song;Allan D. Kirk

  • Sirolimus enhances the magnitude and quality of viral-specific CD8+ T cell responses to vaccinia virus vaccination in rhesus macaques

    Alexandra P. Turner;Virginia Oliva Shaffer;Koichi Araki;Christine Martens

  • Signaling through the Inhibitory Fc Receptor FcγRIIB Induces CD8+ T Cell Apoptosis to Limit T Cell Immunity.

    Anna B. Morris;Clara R. Farley;David F. Pinelli;Layne E. Adams

  • Costimulation Blockade in Autoimmunity and Transplantation: The CD28 Pathway.

    Andrew B. Adams;Mandy L. Ford;Christian P. Larsen

  • Anti-CD40 Monoclonal Antibody Synergizes with CTLA4-Ig in Promoting Long-Term Graft Survival in Murine Models of Transplantation

    Christopher R. Gilson;Zvonimir Milas;Shivaprakash Gangappa;Diane Hollenbaugh

  • Paradoxical aspects of rapamycin immunobiology in transplantation.

    Ivana R. Ferrer;Koichi Araki;Mandy L Ford

  • The Gut Microbiome Alters Immunophenotype and Survival From Sepsis

    Katherine T. Fay;Nathan J. Klingensmith;Ching-Wen Chen;Wenxiao Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian P. Larsen
Christian P. Larsen Emory University
Allan D. Kirk
Allan D. Kirk Duke University
Brian D. Evavold
Brian D. Evavold University of Utah
Thomas C. Pearson
Thomas C. Pearson Emory University
Ming Xue
Ming Xue University of Oklahoma
Rafi Ahmed
Rafi Ahmed Emory University
Michael Koval
Michael Koval Emory University
Howard M. Gebel
Howard M. Gebel Emory University
Peter S. Heeger
Peter S. Heeger Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Steven E. Bosinger
Steven E. Bosinger Emory University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, exploring related healthcare degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many professionals transition into advanced roles through specialized nursing programs. For example, understanding fnp to acute care certification pathways helps Family Nurse Practitioners move into acute care settings, which often intersect with immunological patient care.

Accelerated educational routes are popular for advancing quickly. Prospective students can consider accelerated np programs that offer fast-tracked paths to becoming a Nurse Practitioner, a role crucial in specialties involving immune-related health issues.

For those without a nursing background, online absn programs for non nurses provide a flexible way to enter the nursing profession and eventually specialize in immunology-related fields.

Compensation is also a key consideration. Understanding how much do dnp nurses make across different states can help students and professionals plan careers that balance passion with financial sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Mandy L. Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles