World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
25001
World Ranking
13276
National Ranking
1237

Malcolm H. Pope publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm H. Pope sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 303 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Malcolm H. Pope D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Malcolm H. Pope sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Malcolm H. Pope was affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom during their academic career.

There are no records available of Malcolm H. Pope's recent papers, including titles, years of publication, or publication venues.

Data does not indicate any frequent co-authors associated with this researcher.

Similarly, there is no information on specific venues where Malcolm H. Pope frequently published their work.

No book publications by this individual have been documented through the available data.

The main fields of study related to Malcolm H. Pope's academic work are not listed in the accessible records.

There are no subfields of study specified in connection with this researcher.

No defined main research topics or thematic focuses were documented for this individual.

The data does not include any awards or recognitions attributed to Malcolm H. Pope.

Malcolm H. Pope is confirmed to be deceased.

Best Publications

  • Mechanical changes in the knee after meniscectomy.

    WR Krause;MH Pope;RJ Johnson;DG Wilder

  • Strain within the anterior cruciate ligament during hamstring and quadriceps activity

    P. Renström;S.W. Arms;T.S. Stanwyck;R.J. Johnson

  • The biomechanics of anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation and reconstruction

    Steven W. Arms;Malcolm H. Pope;Robert J. Johnson;Richard A. Fischer

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Strain Behavior During Rehabilitation Exercises In Vivo

    Bruce D. Beynnon;Braden C. Fleming;Robert J. Johnson;Claude E. Nichols

  • An internal fixator for posterior application to short segments of the thoracic, lumbar, or lumbosacral spine. Design and testing.

    Martin H. Krag;Bruce D. Beynnon;Malcolm H. Pope;John W. Frymoyer

  • Etiology of spondylolisthesis. Assessment of the role played by lumbar facet joint morphology.

    Leon J. Grobler;Peter A. Robertson;John E. Novotny;Malcolm H. Pope

  • Muscular response to Sudden load : A tool to evaluate fatigue and rehabilitation

    David G. Wilder;Assen R. Aleksiev;Marianne L. Magnusson;Malcolm H. Pope

  • Are occupational drivers at an increased risk for developing musculoskeletal disorders

    Marianne L. Magnusson;Malcolm H. Pope;David G. Wilder;Bjorn Areskoug

  • Biomechanical definitions of spinal instability.

    Malcolm H. Pope;Manohar Panjabi

  • Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men.

    J W Frymoyer;A Newberg;M H Pope;D G Wilder

  • The measurement of anterior cruciate ligament strain in vivo.

    B. Beynnon;J. G. Howe;M. H. Pope;R. J. Johnson

  • A biomechanical analysis of the Ilizarov external fixator.

    B Fleming;D Paley;T Kristiansen;M Pope

  • Transmissibility of 15-Hertz to 35-Hertz Vibrations to the Human Hip and Lumbar Spine : Determining the Physiologic Feasibility of Delivering Low-Level Anabolic Mechanical Stimuli to Skeletal Regions at Greatest Risk of Fracture Because of Osteoporosis

    Clinton Rubin;Malcolm Pope;J. Chris Fritton;Marianne Magnusson

  • Five- to ten-year follow-up evaluation after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

    Johnson Rj;Eriksson E;Haggmark T;Pope Mh

  • The relationship between anthropometric, postural, muscular, and mobility characteristics of males ages 18-55

    M H Pope;Thomas Bevins;David G. Wilder;J W Frymoyer

  • Vibration and the human spine.

    David G. Wilder;Barry B. Woodworth;John W. Frymoyer;Malcolm H. Pope

  • The biomechanics of lumbar disc herniation and the effect of overload and instability.

    David G. Wilder;Malcolm H. Pope;John W. Frymoyer

  • A prospective randomized three-week trial of spinal manipulation, transcutaneous muscle stimulation, massage and corset in the treatment of subacute low back pain

    Malcolm H. Pope;Reed B. Phillips;Larry D. Haugh;Chang-Yu J. Hsieh

  • An analytical model of the knee

    R. Crowninshield;M.H. Pope;R.J. Johnson

  • Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis.

    Karen M. Kuntz;Robert K. Snider;James Neil Weinstein;Malcolm H. Pope

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce D. Beynnon
Bruce D. Beynnon University of Vermont
Braden C. Fleming
Braden C. Fleming Brown University
Vijay K. Goel
Vijay K. Goel University of Toledo
Gunnar Andersson
Gunnar Andersson Stockholm University
James Neil Weinstein
James Neil Weinstein Microsoft (United States)
Volker K. H. Sonntag
Volker K. H. Sonntag St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Jeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz Brigham and Women's Hospital
James C. Rosen
James C. Rosen University of Vermont
Scott D. Boden
Scott D. Boden Emory University
Markku Järvinen
Markku Järvinen Tampere University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While earning an MD remains a traditional route for those passionate about medicine, there are diverse careers in healthcare that can be accessed through flexible, online study. Many accredited programs allow you to advance your qualifications, leadership skills, or even change your career specialty, all while maintaining your personal and professional commitments.

For those interested in hospital or clinic management, consider exploring the cheapest mha programs available online. If your goal is advanced nursing practice or leadership, the least expensive dnp programs can offer an affordable path to the Doctor of Nursing Practice.

Pharmacists seeking flexibility may benefit from pharmd online programs that balance affordability with high educational standards. Additionally, those drawn to the tech side of healthcare can pursue health information technology programs online to become experts in electronic health systems and data management.

Exploring these pathways can open doors to rewarding careers, often with lower tuition costs and greater scheduling flexibility than traditional, campus-based programs.

Best Scientists Citing Malcolm H. Pope

Recently Published Articles