World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
10655
World Ranking
5974
National Ranking
2034

Lisa Naughton-Treves publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Naughton-Treves sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 64 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Lisa Naughton-Treves D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Naughton-Treves sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa Naughton-Treves is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with significant work in the subfields of global and planetary change, soil science, general agricultural and biological sciences, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as economics and econometrics.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Conservation, biodiversity, and resource management
  • Land rights and reforms
  • Agriculture, land use, rural development
  • Geographies of human-animal interactions
  • Economic and environmental valuation
  • Forest management and policy
  • Rangeland management and livestock ecology

The frequent publication venues for Lisa Naughton-Treves's research include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Environmental Research Letters, The Science of The Total Environment, CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research), and World Development.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Does secure land tenure save forests? A review of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation (2025), published in CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research)
  • What happens when the money runs out? Forest outcomes and equity concerns following Ecuador's suspension of conservation payments (2020), published in World Development
  • The role of smallholder woodlots in global restoration pledges - Lessons from Tanzania (2020), published in Forest Policy and Economics
  • Does formalizing artisanal gold mining mitigate environmental impacts? Deforestation evidence from the Peruvian Amazon (2021), published in Environmental Research Letters
  • The impact of paying for forest conservation on perceived tenure security in Ecuador (2020), published in Conservation Letters

Lisa Naughton-Treves collaborates frequently with several researchers. Notable coauthors include Jessica L'Roe, Margaret B. Holland, Niwaeli E. Kimambo, Lisa Rausch, and Nicolle Etchart.

Best Publications

  • The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Margaret Buck Holland;Katrina Brandon

  • Co-Managing Human–Wildlife Conflicts: A Review

    Adrian Treves;Robert B. Wallace;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Andrea Morales

  • Paying for Tolerance: Rural Citizens' Attitudes toward Wolf Depredation and Compensation

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Rebecca Grossberg;Adrian Treves;Adrian Treves

  • Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda.

    Lisa Naughton-Treves

  • Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest

    Lisa Naughton‐Treves;Adrian Treves;Colin Chapman;Richard Wrangham

  • Does secure land tenure save forests? A meta-analysis of the relationship between land tenure and tropical deforestation

    Brian E. Robinson;Brian E. Robinson;Margaret B. Holland;Margaret B. Holland;Lisa Naughton-Treves

  • Predicting Human-Carnivore Conflict: a Spatial Model Derived from 25 Years of Data on Wolf Predation on Livestock

    Adrian Treves;Adrian Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Elizabeth K. Harper;David J. Mladenoff

  • Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities

    Karen Archabald;Lisa Naughton-Treves

  • Risk and opportunity for humans coexisting with large carnivores

    Adrian Treves;L. Naughton-Treves

  • Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Adrian Treves

  • FARMING THE FOREST EDGE: VULNERABLE PLACES AND PEOPLE AROUND KIBALE NATIONAL PARK, UGANDA

    Unknown

  • Get The Science Right When Paying For Nature's Services

    S. Naeem;J. C. Ingram;A. Varga;T. Agardy

  • Longitudinal Analysis of Attitudes Toward Wolves

    Adrian Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Victoria Shelley

  • Wildlife Survival Beyond Park Boundaries: the Impact of Slash-and-Burn Agriculture and Hunting on Mammals in Tambopata, Peru

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Jose Luis Mena;Adrian Treves;Nora Alvarez

  • People and Wildlife: Evaluating lethal control in the management of human–wildlife conflict

    Adrian Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves

  • Lessons about parks and poverty from a decade of forest loss and economic growth around Kibale National Park, Uganda

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Jennifer Alix-Garcia;Colin A. Chapman

  • Incorporating land tenure security into conservation.

    Brian E. Robinson;Yuta J. Masuda;Allison Kelly;Margaret B. Holland

  • Predicting folivorous primate abundance: Validation of a nutritional model

    Colin A. Chapman;Lauren J. Chapman;Lauren J. Chapman;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Michael J. Lawes

  • Burning biodiversity: Woody biomass use by commercial and subsistence groups in western Uganda’s forests

    Lisa Naughton-Treves;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Daniel M. Kammen;Colin Chapman;Colin Chapman

  • Wolf depredation on domestic animals in Wisconsin, 1976-2000

    A Treves;RR Jurewicz;L Naughton-Treves

  • RESEARCH ARTICLE Predicting Folivorous Primate Abundance: Validation of a Nutritional Model

    Colin A. Chapman;Lauren J. Chapman;Lisa Naughton-Treves;Michael J. Lawes

Frequent Co-Authors

Adrian Treves
Adrian Treves University of Wisconsin–Madison
Colin A. Chapman
Colin A. Chapman Vancouver Island University
Krithi K. Karanth
Krithi K. Karanth Duke University
Michael J. Lawes
Michael J. Lawes University of KwaZulu-Natal
David Wilkie
David Wilkie Wildlife Conservation Society
Lauren J. Chapman
Lauren J. Chapman University of Florida
Götz Schroth
Götz Schroth Rainforest Alliance
Arild Angelsen
Arild Angelsen Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Ruth S. DeFries
Ruth S. DeFries Columbia University
Lee Russell McDowell
Lee Russell McDowell University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring ecology and evolution in the USA can unlock diverse and rewarding career opportunities. Many students interested in these fields are also drawn to related disciplines, where online degrees can fast-track their professional journey. Flexible options like accelerated masters psychology programs help graduates quickly gain expertise and enter the workforce in less time.

For those passionate about mental health or supporting diverse populations, pursuing a masters degree in counseling online offers specialized credentials and career flexibility. Some graduates discover high-growth sectors like high paying jobs in forensic psychology, where scientific thinking and analytical skills are highly valued.

Others may find their calling working with younger populations. Earning a masters in child psychology online prepares you for roles supporting children’s development and well-being. Each of these pathways shares a foundation in research, data analysis, and understanding behavior—critical skills for success in ecology, evolution, and related careers.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Naughton-Treves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles