World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard J. Stevens

Richard J. Stevens

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5182
World Ranking
9884
National Ranking
4156

Richard J. Stevens publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 163 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard J. Stevens D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Stevens sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Database
  • Operating system
  • Programming language

His primary areas of study are Information retrieval, Logical data model, Theoretical computer science, Data mining and External Data Representation. Query optimization and Query expansion are among the areas of Information retrieval where the researcher is concentrating his efforts. The concepts of his Logical data model study are interwoven with issues in Field, Data abstraction and Database design.

His Data mining research includes themes of Computer program, Set and Relevance. His External Data Representation research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Database schema and Information repository. His work deals with themes such as Abstraction layer, Data model and Component, which intersect with Information repository.

His most cited work include:

  • Application portability and extensibility through database schema and query abstraction (152 citations)
  • Secure database access through partial encryption (143 citations)
  • Process for data driven application integration for B2B (125 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Information retrieval, Database, Data mining, Set and Theoretical computer science. His work on Query optimization, Query expansion and Question answering as part of general Information retrieval study is frequently connected to Sargable and Web query classification, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them. As part of his studies on Database, Richard J. Stevens often connects relevant subjects like Process.

His Data mining research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Field, Selection and Data access. As a part of the same scientific family, Richard J. Stevens mostly works in the field of Set, focusing on Workflow management system and, on occasion, Distributed computing. His Theoretical computer science study which covers Logical data model that intersects with External Data Representation and Abstraction layer.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Information retrieval (32.72%)
  • Database (29.01%)
  • Data mining (19.75%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Information retrieval (32.72%)
  • Artificial intelligence (8.02%)
  • Natural language processing (6.79%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Information retrieval, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Computer program and Natural language. His study ties his expertise on Set together with the subject of Information retrieval. His study looks at the relationship between Set and topics such as Data mining, which overlap with Selection.

His Natural language processing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Interpretation, Relevance and Presentation. His research in Computer program intersects with topics in Recommender system and World Wide Web. The Natural language study combines topics in areas such as Representation and Knowledge graph.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Natural language processing ('nlp') (16 citations)
  • Analyzing Natural Language Questions to Determine Missing Information in Order to Improve Accuracy of Answers (12 citations)
  • Automatic Generation of Training Cases and Answer Key from Historical Corpus (9 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Database
  • Operating system
  • Programming language

Richard J. Stevens focuses on Information retrieval, Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Questions and answers and Data structure. His studies deal with areas such as Interface, Set, Natural language and Association as well as Information retrieval. His study in Set is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Data access, Data model, Column and Table.

His Artificial intelligence research incorporates themes from Fragment, Process, Truth value and Relevance. His work carried out in the field of Natural language processing brings together such families of science as Computer program and Feature. His research integrates issues of Granularity and Database in his study of Data structure.

Best Publications

  • Application portability and extensibility through database schema and query abstraction

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Peter John Johnson;Richard Joseph Stevens;Ikhua Tong

  • Secure database access through partial encryption

    Richard D. Dettinger;Frederick A. Kulack;Richard J. Stevens;Eric W. Will

  • Process for data driven application integration for B2B

    Terrence Ross O'Brien;William Craig Rapp;Richard Joseph Stevens

  • Graphical user interface for building queries with hierarchical conditions

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Peter John Johnson;Richard Joseph Stevens;Ikhua Tong

  • Method and system for providing aggregate data access

    Richard D. Dettinger;Richard J. Stevens;Jeffrey W. Tenner

  • Dealing with composite data through data model entities

    Richard D. Dettinger;Jennifer L. LaRocca;Richard J. Stevens;Jeffrey W. Tenner

  • Dynamic content generation/regeneration for a database schema abstraction

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Richard Joseph Stevens

  • Dynamic end user specific customization of an application's physical data layer through a data repository abstraction layer

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Richard Joseph Stevens

  • Remote data access and integration of distributed data sources through data schema and query abstraction

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Richard Joseph Stevens

  • Optimizing workflow execution against a heterogeneous grid computing topology

    Richard D. S. Dettinger;Cale T. Rath;Richard J. Stevens;Shannon E. Wenzel

  • Query abstraction high level parameters for reuse and trend analysis

    Richard D. Dettinger;Richard J. Stevens

  • Abstract data linking and joining interface

    Richard D. Dettinger;Cale T. Rath;Richard J. Stevens

  • Sequential stepwise query condition building

    Richard Dettinger;Daniel Kolz;Richard Stevens;Jeffrey Tenner

  • Auditing database access in a distributed medical computing environment

    Joel C. Dubbels;Janice R. Glowacki;Richard J. Stevens

  • Partial and parallel pipeline processing in a deep question answering system

    Adam T. Clark;Mark G. Megerian;John E. Petri;Richard J. Stevens

  • Metadata management for a data abstraction model

    Richard Dean Dettinger;Daniel Paul Kolz;Richard Joseph Stevens;Jeffrey Wayne Tenner

  • Iterative data analysis enabled through query result abstraction

    Richard D. Dettinger;Richard J. Stevens

  • Intelligent query re-execution

    Richard D. Dettinger;Richard J. Stevens;Jeffrey W. Tenner

  • Relationship management in a data abstraction model

    Richard D. Dettinger;Daniel P. Kolz;Richard J. Stevens;Shannon E. Wenzel

  • Intelligent evidence classification and notification in a deep question answering system

    Adam T. Clark;Mark G. Megerian;John E. Petri;Richard J. Stevens

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric L. Barsness
Eric L. Barsness IBM (United States)
John Matthew Santosuosso
John Matthew Santosuosso IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous related online degrees and fast-evolving career pathways. One popular route is pursuing a graduate degree in data science. If affordability is a key concern, you may want to consider the cheapest data science masters in usa to maximize your return on investment.

Another in-demand option is electrical engineering, crucial for careers in tech and innovation. Flexible learning options like an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering allow you to study from anywhere while building foundational skills.

If you’re looking for quick credentials that can lead to high-paying jobs, there are plenty of easy certifications to get in tech and IT fields. These certifications are ideal for those seeking to enhance their resumes quickly and efficiently.

Time-conscious learners may also want to investigate the quickest masters degree online programs, which can help you advance in your career in the shortest amount of time possible.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Stevens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles