World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7819 7216 3356 3033 97 7456

Kelly T. Dineley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kelly T. Dineley between 1996 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kelly T. Dineley published across 29 years, from 1996 to 2024, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 5 of the 97 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications
1996 2024

97 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kelly T. Dineley: publications per year, 1996 to 2024
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 3
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 2
2010 2
2011 2
2012 6
2013 5
2014 12
2015 6
2016 3
2017 15
2018 7
2019 4
2020 3
2021 2
2022 1
2023 3
2024 2
Total 97
Download as CSV

Kelly T. Dineley publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly T. Dineley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 88–97 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 97 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452 97
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Kelly T. Dineley D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kelly T. Dineley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Kelly T. Dineley is affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with particular focus areas including Neurology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Infectious Diseases, and Biological Psychiatry.

Their main research topics cover:

  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Dineley has contributed to a range of publications in several scientific journals, including multiple papers in Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health and Brain Behavior and Immunity. Other venues include Nature Communications, Neuroscience, and Brain and Behavior.

Significant papers by Kelly T. Dineley include:

  • "Soluble pathogenic tau enters brain vascular endothelial cells and drives cellular senescence and brain microvascular dysfunction in a mouse model of tauopathy" (2023, Nature Communications)
  • "Long-term, West Nile virus-induced neurological changes: A comparison of patients and rodent models" (2020, Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health)
  • "Fentanyl self-administration impacts brain immune responses in male Sprague-Dawley rats" (2020, Brain Behavior and Immunity)
  • "Maternal Opioid Exposure Culminates in Perturbed Murine Neurodevelopment and Hyperactive Phenotype in Adolescence" (2021, Neuroscience)
  • "Enhancement of select cognitive domains with rosiglitazone implicates dorsal hippocampus circuitry sensitive to PPARγ agonism in an Alzheimer's mouse model" (2020, Brain and Behavior)

Frequent collaborators working alongside Dineley include Irma E. Cisneros, Kathryn A. Cunningham, Slobodan Paessler, Chanida Fongsaran, and Stacy A. Hussong.

Best Publications

  • β-Amyloid Activates the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade via Hippocampal α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors:In Vitro and In Vivo Mechanisms Related to Alzheimer's Disease

    Kelly Dineley;M. Westerman;D. Bui;K. Bell

  • Nicotinic ACh receptors as therapeutic targets in CNS disorders

    Kelly T. Dineley;Anshul A. Pandya;Jerrel L. Yakel

  • Accelerated plaque accumulation, associative learning deficits and up-regulation of α7 nicotinic receptor protein in transgenic mice co-expressing mutant human presenilin 1 and amyloid precursor proteins

    Kelly T. Dineley;Xuefeng Xia;Duy Bui;J. David Sweatt

  • Passive immunization with tau oligomer monoclonal antibody reverses tauopathy phenotypes without affecting hyperphosphorylated neurofibrillary tangles

    Diana L. Castillo-Carranza;Urmi Sengupta;Marcos J. Guerrero-Muñoz;Cristian A. Lasagna-Reeves

  • The A-type potassium channel Kv4.2 is a substrate for the mitogen-activated protein kinase ERK.

    J. Paige Adams;Anne E. Anderson;Andrew W. Varga;Kelly T. Dineley

  • Loss of α7 Nicotinic Receptors Enhances β-Amyloid Oligomer Accumulation, Exacerbating Early-Stage Cognitive Decline and Septohippocampal Pathology in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

    Caterina M. Hernandez;Rakez Kayed;Hui Zheng;J. David Sweatt

  • β-Amyloid Peptide Activates α7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Expressed in Xenopus Oocytes

    Kelly T. Dineley;Karen A. Bell;Duy Bui;J. David Sweatt

  • Septal Cholinergic Neuromodulation Tunes the Astrocyte-Dependent Gating of Hippocampal NMDA Receptors to Wakefulness

    Thomas Papouin;Jaclyn M. Dunphy;Michaela Tolman;Kelly T. Dineley

  • Intermediate- and long-term recognition memory deficits in Tg2576 mice are reversed with acute calcineurin inhibition.

    Giulio Taglialatela;Dale Hogan;Wen Ru Zhang;Kelly T. Dineley

  • Presenilin 1 familial Alzheimer's disease mutation leads to defective associative learning and impaired adult neurogenesis.

    R. Wang;Kelly Dineley;J. D. Sweatt;H. Zheng

  • Research update: Alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor mechanisms in Alzheimer's disease

    H. Rheinallt Parri;Caterina M. Hernandez;Kelly T. Dineley

  • Collapsin response mediator protein‐2 hyperphosphorylation is an early event in Alzheimer’s disease progression

    Adam R. Cole;Wendy Noble;Lidy Van Aalten;Florian Plattner

  • Acute inhibition of calcineurin restores associative learning and memory in Tg2576 APP transgenic mice

    Kelly T. Dineley;Dale Hogan;Wen Ru Zhang;Giulio Taglialatela

  • Neurological Sequelae Resulting from Encephalitic Alphavirus Infection.

    Shannon E. Ronca;Kelly T. Dineley;Slobodan Paessler

  • Tau immunotherapy modulates both pathological tau and upstream amyloid pathology in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

    Diana L. Castillo-Carranza;Marcos J. Guerrero-Muñoz;Urmi Sengupta;Caterina Hernandez

  • Insulin resistance in Alzheimer's disease

    Kelly T. Dineley;Jordan B. Jahrling;Larry Denner

  • Cognitive Enhancement with Rosiglitazone Links the Hippocampal PPARγ and ERK MAPK Signaling Pathways

    Larry A. Denner;Jennifer Rodriguez-Rivera;Sigmund J. Haidacher;Jordan B. Jahrling

  • Amyloid‐β oligomers impair fear conditioned memory in a calcineurin‐dependent fashion in mice

    Kelly T. Dineley;Rakez Kayed;Volker Neugebauer;Yu Fu

  • α‐Synuclein oligomers oppose long‐term potentiation and impair memory through a calcineurin‐dependent mechanism: relevance to human synucleopathic diseases

    Zane S. Martin;Volker Neugebauer;Kelly T. Dineley;Rakez Kayed

  • MAPK recruitment by β-amyloid in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures depends on physical state and exposure time

    Karen A. Bell;Karen A. Bell;Kenneth J. O'Riordan;J. David Sweatt;Kelly T. Dineley

  • Rosiglitazone reversal of Tg2576 cognitive deficits is independent of peripheral gluco-regulatory status.

    Jennifer Rodriguez-Rivera;Larry Denner;Kelly T. Dineley

Frequent Co-Authors

Rakez Kayed
Rakez Kayed The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Giulio Taglialatela
Giulio Taglialatela The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
J. David Sweatt
J. David Sweatt University of Alabama at Birmingham
Slobodan Paessler
Slobodan Paessler The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Scott D. Lane
Scott D. Lane The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Alan D.T. Barrett
Alan D.T. Barrett The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Volker Neugebauer
Volker Neugebauer The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Salvatore Oddo
Salvatore Oddo Arizona State University
Hui Zheng
Hui Zheng Baylor College of Medicine
Joy M. Schmitz
Joy M. Schmitz The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in broadening your career prospects alongside Neuroscience? Exploring degrees in related STEM fields can unlock high salaries and job security. According to insights on the most lucrative college majors, disciplines such as biomedical engineering, computer science, and applied mathematics frequently lead to some of the best-paid roles in healthcare and research.

For students aiming to reduce educational costs, there are many online schools that accept fafsa. These options make it easier to pursue online neuroscience-related degrees with financial aid, allowing greater access and flexibility.

Not everyone needs a lengthy degree to boost their career. Consider certificate programs that pay well. Fields like medical coding, clinical research, or data analysis offer targeted education with strong job outlooks.

If you're looking for a streamlined academic path, check the easiest degree to get online. These programs can complement your neuroscience studies or open up new roles in allied health, psychology, or administration.

Best Scientists Citing Kelly T. Dineley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles