World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Keith D. K. Luk

Keith D. K. Luk

Keith D. K. Luk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Keith D. K. Luk between 1987 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Keith D. K. Luk published across 36 years, from 1987 to 2022, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2009. 3 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2009. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 8 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1987 2022

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Keith D. K. Luk: publications per year, 1987 to 2022
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 4
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 8
2008 9
2009 11
2010 10
2011 11
2012 6
2013 4
2014 9
2015 11
2016 9
2017 4
2018 5
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
Total 134
Download as CSV

Keith D. K. Luk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith D. K. Luk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Keith D. K. Luk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith D. K. Luk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Keith D. K. Luk is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China. Their research work primarily focuses on the medical field, with a particular emphasis on surgery, pathology and forensic medicine, and pharmacology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of issues related to spinal health and treatment. These include:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Scoliosis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management

Keith D. K. Luk has published in several academic journals, including:

  • Asian Spine Journal
  • Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
  • European Spine Journal

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by the scientist include:

  • "The Concerns and Experiences of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Regarding Prehabilitation and Recovery After Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Study," 2022, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
  • "Selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra in main thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Is it safe to fuse shorter than the last touched vertebra?", 2020, European Spine Journal
  • "The Concept of Lamina-Pedicle Perpendicularity: Part 1. Lumbar Spine," 2020, Asian Spine Journal
  • "The Concept of Lamina-Pedicle Perpendicularity: Part 2: Thoracic Spine," 2020, Asian Spine Journal

The scientist has collaborated frequently with peers in their field. Their common coauthors include:

  • Dino Samartzis
  • Jason Pui Yin Cheung
  • Tarek El-Fiky
  • Nirmal Dhananjay Patil
  • Mohamed Esam Faheem

Best Publications

  • Prevalence and pattern of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging changes in a population study of one thousand forty-three individuals.

    Kenneth M. C. Cheung;Jaro Karppinen;Danny Chan;Daniel W. H. Ho

  • Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

    Jack C Cheng;René M Castelein;Winnie C Chu;Aina J Danielsson;Aina J Danielsson

  • Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments

    Daniel H. K. Chow;Keith D. K. Luk;John H. Evans;John C. Y. Leong

  • Strontium promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through the Ras/MAPK signaling pathway

    Songlin Peng;Guangqian Zhou;Keith D.K. Luk;Kenneth M.C. Cheung

  • Intervertebral disc regeneration: do nutrients lead the way?

    Yong-Can Huang;Jill P. G. Urban;Keith D. K. Luk

  • A population-based study of juvenile disc degeneration and its association with overweight and obesity, low back pain, and diminished functional status

    Dino Samartzis;Jaro Karppinen;Florence Mok;Daniel Y.T. Fong

  • Pyogenic spondylitis

    W. Y. Cheung;Keith D. K. Luk

  • An investigation on the physicochemical properties of chitosan/DNA polyelectrolyte complexes.

    Wenguang Liu;Shujun Sun;Zhiqiang Cao;Xin Zhang

  • The association of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging with body mass index in overweight and obese adults: A population-based study

    Dino Samartzis;Jaro Karppinen;Danny Chan;Keith D. K. Luk

  • Modic changes of the lumbar spine: prevalence, risk factors, and association with disc degeneration and low back pain in a large-scale population-based cohort

    Florence P.S. Mok;Dino Samartzis;Jaro Karppinen;Daniel Y.T. Fong

  • Prevalence, distribution, and morphology of ossification of the ligamentum flavum: a population study of one thousand seven hundred thirty-six magnetic resonance imaging scans.

    Jiong Jiong Guo;Keith D. K. Luk;Jaro Karppinen;Huilin Yang

  • A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening.

    Daniel Yee Tak Fong;Chun Fan Lee;Kenneth Man Chee Cheung;Jack Chun Yiu Cheng

  • A genetic locus for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis linked to chromosome 19p13.3.

    Vivian Chan;Gardian C.Y. Fong;Keith D.K. Luk;Ben Yip

  • Lung function reference values in Chinese children and adolescents in Hong Kong. I. Spirometric values and comparison with other populations.

    Mary S. M. Ip;Eva M. Karlberg;Johan P. E. Karlberg;Keith D. K. Luk

  • Prediction of Correction of Scoliosis with Use of the Fulcrum Bending Radiograph

    K. M. C. Cheung;K. D. K. Luk

  • Degenerative magnetic resonance imaging changes in patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

    Dean Chou;Dino Samartzis;Carlo Bellabarba;Alpesh Patel

  • The TRP2 allele of COL9A2 is an age-dependent risk factor for the development and severity of intervertebral disc degeneration.

    Jeffrey J T Jim;Noora Noponen-Hietala;Kenneth M C Cheung;Jürg Ott

  • In vivo cancellous bone remodeling on a Strontium-containing hydroxyapatite (Sr-HA) bioactive cement

    C T Wong;W W Lu;W K Chan;K M C Cheung

  • Association of JAG1 with Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Fractures: A Genome-wide Association Study and Follow-up Replication Studies

    Annie W.C. Kung;Su Mei Xiao;Stacey Cherny;Gloria H.Y. Li

  • Osteoprecursor cell response to strontium-containing hydroxyapatite ceramics

    Weichang Xue;Jessica L. Moore;Howard L. Hosick;Susmita Bose

Frequent Co-Authors

William W. Lu
William W. Lu University of Hong Kong
Yong Hu
Yong Hu University of Hong Kong
Kelvin W.K. Yeung
Kelvin W.K. Yeung University of Hong Kong
Paul K. Chu
Paul K. Chu City University of Hong Kong
Jaro Karppinen
Jaro Karppinen University of Oulu
Daniel W. Chan
Daniel W. Chan Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Shuilin Wu
Shuilin Wu Peking University
C.Y. Chung
C.Y. Chung City University of Hong Kong
Pak C. Sham
Pak C. Sham University of Hong Kong
Zhaoyang Li
Zhaoyang Li Tianjin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering alternative or supplementary paths to a career in healthcare can open more doors for you. While pursuing a traditional MD is a popular route, there are flexible, online options available that can enhance your qualifications or offer entirely different medical roles.

For registered nurses looking to advance their education affordably, explore the cheapest online rn to bsn programs. These programs offer a convenient way to earn your Bachelor of Science in Nursing at a lower cost. If your undergraduate degree is in a non-nursing field, you might consider transitioning to advanced nursing roles with a non nursing bachelor's to msn online program, allowing for a streamlined path to a master’s in nursing.

Applicants searching for accessible options can benefit from reviewing the easy nursing schools to get into. These schools often have higher acceptance rates and can be a practical starting point for your healthcare career.

If clinical practice isn’t your preference, medical administration is another fast-growing field. Accredited and supported programs, like those listed among the accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid, can help you start a career in medical billing and coding online, often with strong financial aid options.

Best Scientists Citing Keith D. K. Luk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles