World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 59 12836 11811 93 89 125 9086

Wim De Coen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wim De Coen between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wim De Coen published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2010. 2 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2010. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1994 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wim De Coen: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 10
2004 7
2005 9
2006 18
2007 17
2008 8
2009 10
2010 21
2011 8
2012 8
2013 3
2014 4
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 1
2025 1
Total 135
Download as CSV

Wim De Coen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim De Coen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848 125
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Wim De Coen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim De Coen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253 59
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Wim De Coen is affiliated with the European Chemicals Agency in Finland, contributing to research primarily in the fields of Medicine, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Environmental Science. Their work often addresses public health concerns, environmental factors, and agricultural sustainability.

The scientist's recent research publications include:

  • One Health collaboration with and among EU Agencies - Bridging research and policy, 2022, One Health
  • The framework for action of the Cross-agency One Health Task Force, 2024, One Health
  • Scientific cooperation among Europe's One Health agencies, 2025, One Health

De Coen's research themes are diverse but closely linked by a focus on intertwined human, animal, and environmental health, often under the One Health paradigm. Key topics in their work include:

  • Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Insect and pesticide research
  • Animal disease management and epidemiology
  • Agriculture sustainability and environmental impact
  • Climate change and health impacts
  • Nutrition, genetics, and disease

Subfields of study that underpin this research showcase an interdisciplinary approach, encompassing Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Insect Science, Agronomy and Crop Science, Ecology, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of peers, reflecting a networked and cross-disciplinary research environment. Notable co-authors include:

  • S L A M Bronzwaer
  • Ole Heuer
  • Ian Marnane
  • Ana Maria Centola Vidal
  • Mike Catchpole

All recent publications by Wim De Coen have appeared in the journal One Health, indicating a consistent focus on integrative health research that bridges policy and scientific inquiry across European agencies and institutions. This focus aligns with their commitment to addressing the complex dynamics of health in the context of environmental and societal factors.

Best Publications

  • The missing biomarker link: Relationships between effects on the cellular energy allocation biomarker of toxicant‐stressed Daphnia magna and corresponding population characteristics

    Wim M. De Coen;Wim M. De Coen;Colin R. Janssen

  • Recent advances in recognition elements of food and environmental biosensors: a review

    Bieke Van Dorst;Jaytry Mehta;Karen Bekaert;Elsa Rouah-Martin

  • Development of a screening assay to identify teratogenic and embryotoxic chemicals using the zebrafish embryo

    Ingrid W.T. Selderslaghs;An R. Van Rompay;Wim De Coen;Hilda E. Witters

  • Arabidopsis thaliana plants acclimated to low dose rates of ultraviolet B radiation show specific changes in morphology and gene expression in the absence of stress symptoms

    Kathleen Hectors;Els Prinsen;Wim De Coen;Marcel A. K. Jansen

  • Perfluorinated Substances in Human Food and Other Sources of Human Exposure

    Wendy D’Hollander;Pim de Voogt;Wim De Coen;Lieven Bervoets

  • Locomotor activity in zebrafish embryos: a new method to assess developmental neurotoxicity.

    Ingrid W.T. Selderslaghs;Jef Hooyberghs;Jef Hooyberghs;Wim De Coen;Hilda E. Witters

  • Perfluorinated chemicals infiltrate ocean waters: link between exposure levels and stable isotope ratios in marine mammals.

    Kristin Inneke Van de Vijver;Philippe Tony Hoff;Krishna Das;Walter Van Dongen

  • Estrogen-like properties of fluorotelomer alcohols as revealed by mcf-7 breast cancer cell proliferation.

    Marleen Maras;Caroline Vanparys;Frederik Muylle;Johan Robbens

  • Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in bib (Trisopterus luscus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) from the Western Scheldt and the Belgian North Sea: Distribution and biochemical effects

    Philippe T. Hoff;Kristin Van de Vijver;Walter Van Dongen;Eddy L. Esmans

  • New Microbiotests for Routine Toxicity Screening and Biomonitoring

    Guido Persoone;Colin Janssen;Wim De Coen

  • Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid and organohalogen pollutants in liver of three freshwater fish species in Flanders (Belgium): relationships with biochemical and organismal effects.

    Philippe Tony Hoff;Karen Van Campenhout;Kristin Van de Vijver;Adrian Covaci

  • Omics in algae: paving the way for a systems biological understanding of algal stress phenomena?

    An Jamers;Ronny Blust;Wim De Coen

  • Molecular impact of propiconazole on Daphnia magna using a reproduction-related cDNA array.

    Anneleen Soetaert;Lotte N. Moens;Karlijn Van der Ven;Koen Van Leemput

  • A biology-based approach for mixture toxicity of multiple endpoints over the life cycle

    Tjalling Jager;Tine Vandenbrouck;Jan Baas;Wim M. De Coen

  • An omics based assessment of cadmium toxicity in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

    An Jamers;Ronny Blust;Wim De Coen;Julian L. Griffin

  • Linking Molecular and Population Stress Responses in Daphnia magna exposed to cadmium

    Richard E Connon;Helen L. Hooper;Richard M. Sibly;Fei Ling Lim

  • Tissue-specific Cu bioaccumulation patterns and differences in sensitivity to waterborne Cu in three freshwater fish: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), and gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio).

    Gudrun De Boeck;Wouter Meeus;Wim De Coen;Ronny Blust

  • Tissue distribution of perfluorinated chemicals in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) from the Dutch Wadden Sea.

    Kristin Inneke Van de Vijver;Philippe Hoff;Krishna Das;Sophie Brasseur

  • The use of biomarkers in Daphnia magna toxicity testing. I. The digestive physiology of daphnids exposed to toxic stress

    Wim M. De Coen;Colin R. Janssen

  • Molecular responses during cadmium-induced stress in Daphnia magna: integration of differential gene expression with higher-level effects.

    Anneleen Soetaert;Tine Vandenbrouck;Karlijn van der Ven;Marleen Maras

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronny Blust
Ronny Blust University of Antwerp
Adrian Covaci
Adrian Covaci University of Antwerp
Colin R. Janssen
Colin R. Janssen Ghent University
Ron Verhagen
Ron Verhagen University of Antwerp
Lieven Bervoets
Lieven Bervoets University of Antwerp
Amadeu M.V.M. Soares
Amadeu M.V.M. Soares University of Aveiro
Jurgen Del-Favero
Jurgen Del-Favero University of Antwerp
Stefan Voorspoels
Stefan Voorspoels Flemish Institute for Technological Research
Guy Smagghe
Guy Smagghe Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Paul Schepens
Paul Schepens University of Antwerp

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Thinking about studying Biology or Biochemistry in the USA? There are many online degrees and career pathways to consider, especially if you’re interested in health sciences, nutrition, or diagnostics.

For those drawn to the field of nutrition, a masters in nutrition online offers flexibility and the chance to specialize in dietary science and wellness. Likewise, earning credentials from top dietetics programs in the us can pave the way to careers as registered dietitians or nutrition consultants.

Biochemistry and biology graduates may also find exciting opportunities in the growing medical imaging field. Many students choose sonography programs online or pursue radiology tech online programs to enter healthcare support roles. These programs can lead to rewarding jobs as ultrasound technicians or radiologic technologists, blending science and patient care.

Each of these online study paths offers unique advantages, whether you’re launching your healthcare career or expanding your expertise in the life sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Wim De Coen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles