World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8127 7586 70 68 139 8879

Juan Li publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Juan Li between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Juan Li published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 26.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 205 publications in 2023. 149 of the 577 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
50 100 150 200
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 205. Peak 205 publications in 2023. 2004: 2 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 81 publications 2023: 205 publications 2024: 74 publications 2025: 75 publications
2004 2025

577 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Juan Li: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 2
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 0
2009 0
2010 7
2011 12
2012 10
2013 18
2014 10
2015 14
2016 12
2017 11
2018 13
2019 9
2020 11
2021 9
2022 81
2023 205
2024 74
2025 75
Total 577
Download as CSV

Juan Li publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Juan Li D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juan Li sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Juan Li is affiliated with the Chinese Academy of Sciences in China and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The central topics of Juan Li's research include:

  • Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications

Juan Li has contributed to numerous recent papers, several of which have received significant citations. Selected publications include:

  • High fat diet, gut microbiome and gastrointestinal cancer, 2021, Theranostics
  • Liposomal Delivery of Mitoxantrone and a Cholesteryl Indoximod Prodrug Provides Effective Chemo-immunotherapy in Multiple Solid Tumors, 2020, ACS Nano
  • An ROS-responsive artesunate prodrug nanosystem co-delivers dexamethasone for rheumatoid arthritis treatment through the HIF-1α/NF-κB cascade regulation of ROS scavenging and macrophage repolarization, 2022, Acta Biomaterialia
  • Host development overwhelms environmental dispersal in governing the ecological succession of zebrafish gut microbiota, 2021, npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
  • Tsinghua facial expression database - A database of facial expressions in Chinese young and older women and men: Development and validation, 2020, PLoS ONE

The frequent coauthors associated with Juan Li are:

  • Kui Chen (34 publications)
  • Yanan Chang (34 publications)
  • Gengmei Xing (34 publications)
  • Ziteng Chen (24 publications)
  • Haojun Liang (24 publications)

Juan Li's research has been published extensively in venues such as:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal (23 publications)
  • Research Square (15 publications)
  • ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (12 publications)
  • Nano Today (7 publications)
  • Chemical Engineering Journal (6 publications)

Best Publications

  • Is guided self-help as effective as face-to-face psychotherapy for depression and anxiety disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    P Cuijpers;T Donker;A van Straten;J Li

  • A research agenda for aging in China in the 21st century

    Evandro Fei Fang;Morten Scheibye-Knudsen;Heiko J. Jahn;Juan Li

  • Comprehensive meta-analysis of excess mortality in depression in the general community versus patients with specific illnesses.

    Pim Cuijpers;Nicole Vogelzangs;Jos Twisk;Annet Kleiboer

  • The Beijing version of the montreal cognitive assessment as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: a community-based study

    Jing Yu;Jing Yu;Juan Li;Xin Huang

  • Self-reported versus clinician-rated symptoms of depression as outcome measures in psychotherapy research on depression: A meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Juan Li;Stefan G. Hofmann;Gerhard Andersson;Gerhard Andersson

  • Cognitive intervention for persons with mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis.

    Huijie Li;Juan Li;Nanxin Li;Bing Li

  • Differential mortality rates in major and subthreshold depression: meta-analysis of studies that measured both

    Pirn Cuijpers;Nicole Vogelzangs;Jos Twisk;Annet Kleiboer

  • The more the better? A meta-analysis on effects of combined cognitive and physical intervention on cognition in healthy older adults.

    Xinyi Zhu;Shufei Yin;Minjia Lang;Rongqiao He

  • Psychotherapy for subclinical depression: meta-analysis.

    Pim Cuijpers;Sander L. Koole;Annemiek van Dijke;Miquel Roca

  • Age Effects on the Neural Correlates of Episodic Retrieval: Increased Cortical Recruitment with Matched Performance

    Alexa M. Morcom;Juan Li;Michael D. Rugg

  • Personalized treatment of adult depression: medication, psychotherapy, or both? A systematic review

    Pim Cuijpers;Pim Cuijpers;Charles F. Reynolds;Tara Donker;Tara Donker;Juan Li

  • Prevalence and correlates of depressive symptoms in Chinese older adults: A population-based study

    Jing Yu;Juan Li;Pim Cuijpers;Shengtao Wu

  • Status and prospect of oil recovery from oily sludge: A review

    Kunlong Hui;Jun Tang;Haojie Lu;Beidou Xi

  • Leisure activities, education, and cognitive impairment in Chinese older adults: a population-based longitudinal study.

    Xinyi Zhu;Chengxuan Qiu;Yi Zeng;Juan Li

  • Gender and marital status differences in depressive symptoms among elderly adults: The roles of family support and friend support

    Baoshan Zhang;Juan Li

  • Multimodal intervention in older adults improves resting-state functional connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex and medial temporal lobe †

    Rui Li;Xinyi Zhu;Shufei Yin;Yanan Niu

  • General Belief in a Just World and Resilience: Evidence from a Collectivistic Culture

    Michael Shengtao Wu;Xiaodan Yan;Xiaodan Yan;Xiaodan Yan;Chan Zhou;Yiwen Chen

  • Measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly.

    Baoshan Zhang;Marjolein Fokkema;Pim Cuijpers;Juan Li

  • Psychological treatment of depression in inpatients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Pim Cuijpers;Frans Clignet;Berno van Meijel;Annemieke van Straten

  • The effects of age on the neural correlates of successful episodic retrieval: An ERP study

    Juan Li;Alexa M. Morcom;Michael D. Rugg

  • Research Article PERSONALIZED TREATMENT OF ADULT DEPRESSION: MEDICATION, PSYCHOTHERAPY, OR BOTH? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

    Pim Cuijpers;Charles F. Reynolds;Tara Donker;Juan Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Gregory A. Jicha
Gregory A. Jicha University of Kentucky
Charles D. Smith
Charles D. Smith University of Kentucky
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Frederick A. Schmitt
Frederick A. Schmitt University of Kentucky
Annet Kleiboer
Annet Kleiboer Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mo Wang
Mo Wang University of Florida
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a diverse range of online programs and flexible career pathways. Many students are now considering online psychology degrees for their convenience and the wide variety of specializations, such as clinical, counseling, or school psychology. Additionally, these programs can be completed at an accelerated pace, allowing quicker entry into the workforce.

For those aiming to become counselors, several states offer accelerated options. To get started quickly, explore Colorado accelerated counseling programs or investigate Connecticut accelerated counseling programs. Similarly, if you want the most direct route, check out the Delaware fastest counseling programs and the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Florida.

Online options make it easier than ever to transition from education to practice. With the right program and dedication, you can achieve your psychological career goals efficiently and be prepared to make a difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Juan Li

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles