World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
23083
World Ranking
15222
National Ranking
7678

Joseph K. Haseman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph K. Haseman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 313 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Joseph K. Haseman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph K. Haseman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Joseph K. Haseman is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Immunology and Microbiology, and Medicine. These areas reflect a cross-disciplinary approach to biomedical sciences.

The scientist's subfields of interest include Cancer Research, Immunology, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their work focuses primarily on carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment, immunotoxicology and immune responses, as well as acute lymphoblastic leukemia research.

Haseman has contributed to scholarly literature, with publications appearing in notable venues such as Critical Reviews in Toxicology. One recent paper, published in 2025, is titled "A critical evaluation of rodent carcinogenicity studies on butyl methacrylate demonstrates a lack of carcinogenic potential". This work was co-authored by Susan A. Elmore.

Frequent co-authors throughout their research activities include:

  • Susan A. Elmore
  • Mark Pemberton
  • B. Bhaskar Gollapudi
  • Samuel M. Cohen

Haseman's contributions also extend to professional recognition; notably, they were awarded the title of Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in 1989.

Best Publications

  • Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays.

    Raymond W. Tennant;Barry H. Margolin;Michael D. Shelby;Errol Zeiger

  • The comparative toxicity of chlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins in mice and guinea pigs.

    E.E. McConnell;J.A. Moore;J.K. Haseman;M.W. Harris

  • Use of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies in rodents.

    Joseph K. Haseman;James Huff;Gary A. Boorman

  • Spontaneous Neoplasm Incidences in Fischer 344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice in Two-Year Carcinogenicity Studies: A National Toxicology Program Update

    Joseph K. Haseman;James R. Hailey;Richard W. Morris

  • Natural History of Body Weight Gain, Survival, and Neoplasia in the F344 Rat

    Hendricus A. Solleveld;Joseph K. Haseman;Ernest E. McConnell

  • The use of a correlated binomial model for the analysis of certain toxicological experiments.

    Lawrence L. Kupper;Joseph Kyd Haseman

  • Lack of effects for low dose levels of bisphenol A and diethylstilbestrol on the prostate gland of CF1 mice exposed in utero.

    John Ashby;H. Tinwell;J. Haseman

  • Multiple organ carcinogenicity of 1,3-butadiene in B6C3F1 mice after 60 weeks of inhalation exposure

    JE Huff;RL Melnick;HA Solleveld;JK Haseman

  • Summary of the National Toxicology Program's report of the endocrine disruptors low-dose peer review

    Ronald Melnick;George Lucier;Mary Wolfe;Roxanne Hall

  • The carcinogenicity of dietary di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice.

    W M Kluwe;J K Haseman;J F Douglas;J E Huff

  • Selection of appropriate experimental units in teratology

    R E Staples;J K Haseman

  • Urolithiasis and bladder carcinogenicity of melamine in rodents

    Ronald L. Melnick;Gary A. Boorman;Joseph K. Haseman;Richard J. Montali

  • Increased tumors but uncompromised fertility in the female descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol.

    R R Newbold;R B Hanson;W N Jefferson;B C Bullock

  • Selection of the experimental unit in teratology studies.

    Joseph K. Haseman;Michael D. Hogan

  • The OECD program to validate the rat uterotrophic bioassay to screen compounds for in vivo estrogenic responses: phase 1.

    Jun Kanno;Lesley Onyon;Joseph Haseman;Penelope Fenner-Crisp

  • Proliferative lesions and reproductive tract tumors in male descendants of mice exposed developmentally to diethylstilbestrol

    Retha R. Newbold;Rita B. Hanson;Wendy N. Jefferson;Bill C. Bullock

  • Multiple-site carcinogenicity of benzene in Fischer 344 rats and B6C3F1 mice.

    J. E. Huff;Joseph K. Haseman;David M. DeMarini;Scot Eustis

  • Statistical Issues in the Design, Analysis and Interpretation of Animal Carcinogenicity Studies

    Joseph K. Haseman

  • Neoplasms Observed in Untreated and Corn Oil Gavage Control Groups of F344/N Rats and (C57BL/6N × C3H/HeN)F1 (B6C3F1) Mice

    J. K. Haseman;J. E. Huff;G. N. Rao;J. E. Arnold

  • Chemicals associated with site-specific neoplasia in 1394 long-term carcinogenesis experiments in laboratory rodents.

    James Huff;Joseph Cirvello;Joseph Haseman;John Bucher

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond W. Tennant
Raymond W. Tennant National Institutes of Health
John Ashby
John Ashby Syngenta (Switzerland)
Errol Zeiger
Errol Zeiger National Institutes of Health
Ronald Klein
Ronald Klein University of Wisconsin–Madison
Retha R. Newbold
Retha R. Newbold National Institutes of Health
Kenneth D. R. Setchell
Kenneth D. R. Setchell Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
David B. Dunson
David B. Dunson Duke University
Robert E. Chapin
Robert E. Chapin Pfizer (United States)
J. Carl Barrett
J. Carl Barrett AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Raymond R. Tice
Raymond R. Tice National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens up a variety of related online degree options and alternative career pathways. For those interested in advanced practice nursing, shortest online pmhnp programs allow qualified nurses to specialize in mental health and become Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners efficiently.

Students who are passionate about the administrative side of healthcare might consider a bachelors in health administration. This undergraduate path prepares graduates for management roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

For further advancement, pursuing affordable mha online programs is a smart choice. An MHA equips professionals with strategic, financial, and leadership skills key to healthcare administration.

Those who aspire to reach the highest levels in nursing can explore the best dnp programs online. A Doctor of Nursing Practice degree focuses on clinical practice and leadership, opening doors to advanced clinical and administrative roles.

These related online degrees offer flexible, accessible pathways to healthcare careers beyond traditional MD programs, catering to diverse interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph K. Haseman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles