World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
12107
World Ranking
3825
National Ranking
1462

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
10938
World Ranking
4035
National Ranking
1165

Joseph G. Jacangelo publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Jacangelo sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 152 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Joseph G. Jacangelo D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph G. Jacangelo sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph G. Jacangelo is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a strong emphasis on water treatment and disinfection.

The scientist's work spans several subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis; industrial and manufacturing engineering; environmental chemistry; pollution; and environmental engineering.

Main topics covered in their research include:

  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions

Joseph G. Jacangelo has contributed to several notable publications. Key recent papers include:

  • Detection of ultrashort-chain and other per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in U.S. bottled water, 2021, Water Research
  • Comparative investigation of PFAS adsorption onto activated carbon and anion exchange resins during long-term operation of a pilot treatment plant, 2022, Water Research
  • Coupling fundamental mechanisms and operational controls in mainstream partial denitrification for partial denitrification anammox applications: A review, 2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Selected Mechanistic Aspects of Viral Inactivation by Peracetic Acid, 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Application of machine learning at wastewater treatment facilities: a review of the science, challenges and barriers by level of implementation, 2023, Environmental Technology Reviews

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • AWWA Water Science
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation
  • Water Research
  • Journal of Cleaner Production

Joseph G. Jacangelo collaborates regularly with several co-authors including Kellogg J. Schwab, Joan Oppenheimer, Steven J. Chow, Henry C. Croll, and Michael J. Adelman.

Best Publications

  • The occurrence of disinfection by-products in US drinking water

    Stuart W. Krasner;Michael J. McGuire;Joseph G. Jacangelo;Nancy L. Patania

  • Emerging desalination technologies for water treatment: a critical review.

    Arun Subramani;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Pretreatment for Low Pressure Membranes in Water Treatment: A Review

    Haiou Huang;Kellogg Schwab;Joseph G Jacangelo

  • Energy minimization strategies and renewable energy utilization for desalination: A review

    Arun Subramani;Mohammad Badruzzaman;Joan Oppenheimer;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Selected processes for removing NOM: an overview

    Joseph G. Jacangelo;Jack DeMarco;Douglas M. Owen;Stephen J. Randtke

  • Occurrence and suitability of sucralose as an indicator compound of wastewater loading to surface waters in urbanized regions

    Joan Oppenheimer;Andrew Eaton;Mohammad Badruzzaman;Ali W. Haghani

  • Mechanism of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and MS2 virus removal by MF and UF

    Joseph G. Jacangelo;Samer S. Adham;Jean-Michel Laîné

  • Inactivation of Feline Calicivirus and Adenovirus Type 40 by UV Radiation

    Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez;Charles N. Haas;Joseph Jacangelo;Kelley Riley

  • Treatment technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate volume minimization: A review

    Arun Subramani;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Unified membrane fouling index for low pressure membrane filtration of natural waters: principles and methodology.

    Haiou Huang;Thayer A. Young;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Natural organic matter fouling of low-pressure, hollow-fiber membranes: Effects of NOM source and hydrodynamic conditions.

    Haiou Huang;No Hwa Lee;Thayer Young;Amy Gary

  • Role of membrane technology in drinking water treatment in the United States

    Joseph G. Jacangelo;R. Rhodes Trussell;Montgomery Watson

  • Occurrence of nitrification in chloraminated distribution systems

    Andrzej Wilczak;Joseph G. Jacangelo;Joseph P. Marcinko;Lee H. Odell

  • Chlorine Inactivation of Adenovirus Type 40 and Feline Calicivirus

    Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez;Charles N. Haas;Joseph Jacangelo;Charles P. Gerba

  • Modification of low pressure membranes with carbon nanotube layers for fouling control.

    Gaurav S. Ajmani;David Goodwin;Kristofer Marsh;D. Howard Fairbrother

  • Selection of pretreatment technologies for seawater reverse osmosis plants: A review

    Mohammad Badruzzaman;Nikolay Voutchkov;Lauren Weinrich;Joseph G. Jacangelo;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Ozonation assessing its role in the formation and control of disinfection by products

    Joseph G. Jacangelo;Nancy L. Patania;Kevin M. Reagan;E. Marco Aieta

  • Controlling nitrification in chloraminated systems

    Lee H. Odell;Gregory J. Kirmeyer;Andrzej Wilczak;Joseph G. Jacangelo

  • Sources of nutrients impacting surface waters in Florida: a review.

    Mohammad Badruzzaman;Jimena Pinzon;Joan Oppenheimer;Joseph. G. Jacangelo

  • Impact of ultrafiltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling

    Unknown

  • Committee report. Membrane processes in potable water treatment

    Mark R. Wiesner;Mark M. Clark;Joseph G. Jacangelo;Benjamin W. Lykins

Frequent Co-Authors

Kellogg J. Schwab
Kellogg J. Schwab Johns Hopkins University
Charles N. Haas
Charles N. Haas Drexel University
Samer Adham
Samer Adham Qatar University
Charles P. Gerba
Charles P. Gerba University of Arizona
Shankararaman Chellam
Shankararaman Chellam Texas A&M University
Anthony G. Fane
Anthony G. Fane University of New South Wales
Mark W. LeChevallier
Mark W. LeChevallier Montana State University
Stuart W. Krasner
Stuart W. Krasner Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Tom Stephenson
Tom Stephenson Cranfield University
George Tchobanoglous
George Tchobanoglous University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens diverse career pathways that often overlap with related fields. For students seeking flexible advanced education, pursuing a dsw program can be a strategic choice, especially for those interested in environmental policy and community impact.

Many learners begin with broader academic foundations, such as an affordable online general studies degree, which offers customizable curricula that can integrate environmental topics with other disciplines.

For students prioritizing ease and flexibility, exploring an easy bachelor's degree may provide a less intensive, yet valuable pathway into environmental careers or further graduate studies.

Specialized online programs, such as the online geology degrees, closely align with Environmental Sciences and equip students with critical knowledge about earth systems, supporting roles in research and environmental consulting.

Choosing the right program depends on career goals and educational needs, but these pathways offer flexible options for those passionate about environmental issues and sustainability.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph G. Jacangelo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles