World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
16641
World Ranking
2184
National Ranking
887

Charles N. Haas publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles N. Haas sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 322 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Charles N. Haas D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles N. Haas sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Charles N. Haas is affiliated with Drexel University in the United States and has contributed extensively to environmental science and medicine. Their research primarily focuses on infectious diseases, health toxicology and mutagenesis, sociology and political science, biomedical engineering, and water science and technology.

The scientist's work covers multiple main topics including:

  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Biosensors and analytical detection
  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Water treatment and disinfection
  • Infection control and ventilation
  • Legionella and Acanthamoeba research
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies

Charles N. Haas has published articles in journals and venues such as:

  • Risk Analysis
  • Environmental Science Water Research & Technology
  • UNC Libraries
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Water Research

Several notable recent papers by the scientist include:

  • "Minimizing errors in RT-PCR detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance," 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.," 2021, Environmental Science Water Research & Technology
  • "Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment and Molecular Biology: Paths to Integration," 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • "Tenets of a holistic approach to drinking water-associated pathogen research, management, and communication," 2021, Water Research

Frequent collaborators in their publications include Kerry A. Hamilton, Kyle Bibby, Daniel Gerrity, Patrick L. Gurian, and Aaron Bivins.

Charles N. Haas was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2002.

Best Publications

  • Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment

    Charles N. Haas;Joan B. Rose;Charles P. Gerba

  • Modeling the Risk From Giardia and Viruses in Drinking Water

    Stig Regli;Joan B. Rose;Charles N. Haas;Charles P. Gerba

  • Sensitive populations: who is at the greatest risk?

    Charles P. Gerba;Joan B. Rose;Charles N. Haas

  • Risk Assessment of Virus in Drinking Water

    Charles N. Haas;Joan B. Rose;Charles Gerba;Stig Regli

  • Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: Second Edition

    Charles N. Haas;Joan B. Rose;Charles P. Gerba

  • Risk assessment and control of waterborne giardiasis.

    J B Rose;C N Haas;S Regli

  • Inactivation of Feline Calicivirus and Adenovirus Type 40 by UV Radiation

    Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez;Charles N. Haas;Joseph Jacangelo;Kelley Riley

  • Risk Assessment of Opportunistic Bacterial Pathogens in Drinking Water

    Patricia A. Rusin;Joan B. Rose;Charles N. Haas;Charles P. Gerba

  • Waterborne rotavirus: A risk assessment

    Charles P. Gerba;Joan B. Rose;Charles N. Haas;Kristina D. Crabtree

  • Reproducibility and sensitivity of 36 methods to quantify the SARS-CoV-2 genetic signal in raw wastewater: findings from an interlaboratory methods evaluation in the U.S.

    Brian M. Pecson;Emily Darby;Charles N. Haas;Yamrot M. Amha

  • Chlorine Inactivation of Adenovirus Type 40 and Feline Calicivirus

    Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez;Charles N. Haas;Joseph Jacangelo;Charles P. Gerba

  • Minimizing errors in RT-PCR detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA for wastewater surveillance

    Warish Ahmed;Stuart L. Simpson;Paul M. Bertsch;Kyle Bibby

  • Assessment of the dose-response relationship of Campylobacter jejuni

    G.J. Medema;P.F.M. Teunis;A.H. Havelaar;C.N. Haas

  • It’s Not the Heat, It’s the Humidity: Wet Weather Increases Legionellosis Risk in the Greater Philadelphia Metropolitan Area

    David N. Fisman;Suet Lim;Gregory A. Wellenius;Caroline Johnson

  • Criteria for Selection of Surrogates Used To Study the Fate and Control of Pathogens in the Environment

    Ryan G. Sinclair;Joan B. Rose;Syed A. Hashsham;Charles P. Gerba

  • Assessing the risk posed by oocysts in drinking water

    Charles N. Haas;Christopher S. Crockett;Joan B. Rose;Charles P. Gerba

  • Waterborne adenovirus: A risk assessment

    K.D. Crabtree;C.P. Gerba;J.B. Rose;C.N. Haas

  • Disinfection under Dynamic Conditions: Modification of Hom's Model for Decay.

    Charles N. Haas;Josh. Joffe

  • Estimation of averages in truncated samples

    Charles N. Haas;Peter A. Scheff

  • Inactivation of enteric adenovirus and feline calicivirus by ozone.

    Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez;Charles N. Haas;Joseph Jacangelo;Charles P. Gerba

Frequent Co-Authors

Joan B. Rose
Joan B. Rose Michigan State University
Charles P. Gerba
Charles P. Gerba University of Arizona
Bakhtier Farouk
Bakhtier Farouk Drexel University
Warish Ahmed
Warish Ahmed Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Kyle Bibby
Kyle Bibby University of Notre Dame
Joseph G. Jacangelo
Joseph G. Jacangelo Johns Hopkins University
Simon Toze
Simon Toze Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Jerald L. Schnoor
Jerald L. Schnoor University of Iowa
Mark W. LeChevallier
Mark W. LeChevallier Montana State University
Danny D. Reible
Danny D. Reible Texas Tech University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is an interdisciplinary field, and pursuing related online degrees can broaden your expertise and career opportunities. For those interested in public administration, exploring the best online MPA programs offers specialized knowledge in environmental policy and management.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial in addressing environmental challenges. Earning an accredited online bachelors in sociology can provide valuable insights into community behavior and sustainability practices.

Advancing your education with doctoral programs can enhance research and leadership skills. Consider online Ed D programs without dissertation requirement if you prefer a more practice-oriented route. Additionally, seamless progression from education specialist to doctoral degrees is possible through accredited EdS to EdD programs.

Choosing the right online degree path can significantly impact your ability to contribute effectively to environmental solutions and policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Charles N. Haas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles