World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 52 4480 4288 345 336 176 10037

Jon P. Sadler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jon P. Sadler between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jon P. Sadler published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2023. 16 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2023. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jon P. Sadler: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 2
1995 4
1996 3
1997 1
1998 4
1999 7
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 0
2004 4
2005 2
2006 6
2007 8
2008 6
2009 8
2010 8
2011 8
2012 8
2013 6
2014 9
2015 12
2016 11
2017 13
2018 7
2019 11
2020 6
2021 8
2022 6
2023 17
2024 12
2025 4
Total 209
Download as CSV

Jon P. Sadler publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon P. Sadler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 176 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 176
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jon P. Sadler D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon P. Sadler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266 52
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Ecology
  • Biodiversity
  • Ecosystem

Jon P. Sadler spends much of his time researching Ecology, Biodiversity, Urbanization, Urban ecology and Habitat. Jon P. Sadler regularly ties together related areas like Biological dispersal in his Ecology studies. His studies in Biodiversity integrate themes in fields like North American Model of Wildlife Conservation, Wildlife management, Wildlife, Stakeholder and Environmental resource management.

His work deals with themes such as Pollinator decline, Pollination, Pollinator, Urban density and Species diversity, which intersect with Urban ecology. He works mostly in the field of Urban density, limiting it down to topics relating to Multidisciplinary approach and, in certain cases, Environmental planning, as a part of the same area of interest. The Habitat study combines topics in areas such as Trampling, Biodiversity action plan and Ecosystem diversity.

His most cited work include:

  • Biodiversity in urban habitat patches (306 citations)
  • Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment (276 citations)
  • Changing Bee and Hoverfly Pollinator Assemblages along an Urban-Rural Gradient (192 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Ecology, Habitat, Biodiversity, Environmental resource management and Riparian zone. Jon P. Sadler frequently studies issues relating to Biological dispersal and Ecology. He has researched Habitat in several fields, including Citizen science and Woodland.

His study looks at the intersection of Biodiversity and topics like Invertebrate with Fauna. Jon P. Sadler combines subjects such as Ecosystem services and Environmental planning with his study of Environmental resource management. As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Riparian zone, concentrating on Hydrology and frequently concerns with Ecohydrology.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Ecology (41.11%)
  • Habitat (20.00%)
  • Biodiversity (16.67%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Atmospheric sciences (5.56%)
  • Water quality (3.33%)
  • Ecology (41.11%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jon P. Sadler mostly deals with Atmospheric sciences, Water quality, Ecology, Urban water and In situ. His Atmospheric sciences research includes elements of Organic matter, Drainage basin, Urban stream, Dissolved organic carbon and Spatial heterogeneity. His Water quality research is classified as research in Hydrology.

Ecology is a component of his Food web, Aquatic ecosystem, Biomagnification, Microplastics and Freshwater ecosystem studies. In his works, Jon P. Sadler performs multidisciplinary study on In situ and Fluorescence spectroscopy.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • The value of Twitter data for determining the emotional responses of people to urban green spaces: A case study and critical evaluation: (22 citations)
  • Investigating the Emotional Responses of Individuals to Urban Green Space Using Twitter Data: A Critical Comparison of Three Different Methods of Sentiment Analysis (19 citations)
  • Systematic variation in North American tree species abundance distributions along macroecological climatic gradients (7 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Ecosystem
  • Biodiversity

Jon P. Sadler mainly investigates Built environment, Injury prevention, Suicide prevention, Human factors and ergonomics and Value. Public space and Occupational safety and health are fields of study that overlap with his Built environment research.

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity in urban habitat patches

    P.G. Angold;J.P. Sadler;M.O. Hill;A. Pullin

  • Towards an integrated understanding of green space in the European built environment

    P. James;K. Tzoulas;M. D. Adams;A. Barber

  • Changing Bee and Hoverfly Pollinator Assemblages along an Urban-Rural Gradient

    Adam J. Bates;Jon P. Sadler;Alison J. Fairbrass;Steven J. Falk

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Ecological connectivity research in urban areas

    Scott Daniel LaPoint;Scott Daniel LaPoint;Niko Balkenhol;James Hale;Jonathan Sadler

  • Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban–rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages

    Jonathan Sadler;EC Small;HA Fiszpan;M Telfer

  • The influence of artificial light on stream and riparian ecosystems: questions, challenges, and perspectives

    Elizabeth K. Perkin;Elizabeth K. Perkin;Franz Hölker;John S. Richardson;Jon P. Sadler

  • A climate risk analysis of Earth’s forests in the 21st century

    Unknown

  • Interdisciplinary investigations of the end of the Norse western settlement in Greenland

    L. K. Barlow;J. P. Sadler;A. E. J. Ogilvie;P. C. Buckland

  • Ecohydrology and hydroecology: A ‘new paradigm’?

    David M. Hannah;Paul J. Wood;Jonathan P. Sadler

  • Exploring the Role of Private Wildlife Ranching as a Conservation Tool in South Africa: Stakeholder Perspectives

    Jenny A. Cousins;Jon P. Sadler;James Evans

  • Benchmarking sustainability in cities : The role of indicators and future scenarios

    Christopher T. Boyko;Mark R. Gaterell;Austin R.G. Barber;Julie Brown

  • The role of riparian vegetation density, channel orientation and water velocity in determining river temperature dynamics

    Grace Garner;Iain A. Malcolm;Jonathan P. Sadler;David M. Hannah

  • Gathering at the top?: Environmental controls of microplastic uptake and biomagnification in freshwater food webs

    Stefan Krause;Stefan Krause;Viktor Baranov;Holly A. Nel;Jennifer D. Drummond

  • Scenario Archetypes: Converging Rather than Diverging Themes

    Dexter V. L. Hunt;D. Rachel Lombardi;Stuart Atkinson;Austin R. G. Barber

  • Bioarchaeological and Climatological Evidence for the Fate of Norse Farmers in Medieval Greenland

    Paul C. Buckland;T. Amorosi;L. K. Barlow;Andrew J. Dugmore

  • Habitat Composition and Connectivity Predicts Bat Presence and Activity at Foraging Sites in a Large UK Conurbation

    James D. Hale;Alison J. Fairbrass;Tom J. Matthews;Jon P. Sadler

  • The ecological impact of city lighting scenarios: exploring gap crossing thresholds for urban bats.

    James D. Hale;Alison J. Fairbrass;Thomas J. Matthews;Thomas J. Matthews;Gemma Davies

  • Mapping Lightscapes: Spatial Patterning of Artificial Lighting in an Urban Landscape

    James D. Hale;Gemma Davies;Alison J. Fairbrass;Thomas J. Matthews

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • The hydroecological controls and conservation value of beetles on exposed riverine sediments in England and Wales

    Jon P Sadler;David Bell;Adrian Fowles

  • Vegetation development over four years on two green roofs in the UK

    Adam J. Bates;Jon P. Sadler;Rae Mackay

  • Hydroecology and ecohydrology : past, present and future

    Paul J. Wood;David M. Hannah;J. P. Sadler

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Hannah
David M. Hannah University of Birmingham
Christopher D. F. Rogers
Christopher D. F. Rogers University of Birmingham
Andrew J. Dugmore
Andrew J. Dugmore University of Edinburgh
Anne F. Van Loon
Anne F. Van Loon Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Thomas J. Matthews
Thomas J. Matthews University of Birmingham
James W. Evans
James W. Evans Iowa State University
Kevin J. Edwards
Kevin J. Edwards University of Aberdeen
George E. Davis
George E. Davis University of South Florida
Stefan Krause
Stefan Krause University of Birmingham
Geoffrey E. Petts
Geoffrey E. Petts University of Westminster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in advancing their education beyond a bachelor’s degree, a doctorate degree online no dissertation offers a flexible alternative for those who want to avoid traditional dissertation hurdles. This option is especially attractive for working professionals seeking to balance career and study.

Many programs provide a seamless transition through online eds to edd programs, which is ideal for educators or administrators aiming to move into leadership roles while continuing their professional development remotely.

For those focused on social impact, pursuing a dsw program can open doors to advanced clinical and policy work in social services. These affordable online options broaden access for diverse learners across the country.

Additionally, earning an online general studies degree affordable is an excellent way to build a versatile educational foundation. This degree supports career flexibility and can complement specialized studies in environmental science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jon P. Sadler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles