World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
UK
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
9027
World Ranking
5525
National Ranking
2021

John S. Gulliver publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Gulliver sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 488 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

John S. Gulliver D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John S. Gulliver sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

John S. Gulliver is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has made substantial contributions to environmental science and engineering, particularly in the area of urban stormwater management. Their research spans multiple fields, including environmental engineering and civil and structural engineering, with a focus on practical applications in water and environmental systems.

The main fields of study for Gulliver include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Within these fields, they have worked extensively on subfields such as:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Speech and Hearing

Gulliver's work covers several important research topics related to water and environmental management:

  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts

Their recent publications include a range of articles focused on stormwater infrastructure and environmental impacts:

  • "It Is Not Easy Being Green: Recognizing Unintended Consequences of Green Stormwater Infrastructure," 2020, Water
  • "Evaluation of chloride contributions from major point and nonpoint sources in a northern U.S. state," 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Internal loading in stormwater ponds as a phosphorus source to downstream waters," 2020, Limnology and Oceanography Letters
  • "A Synthesis of Climate Change Impacts on Stormwater Management Systems: Designing for Resiliency and Future Challenges," 2023, Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
  • "Hydrologic processes regulate nutrient retention in stormwater detention ponds," 2022, The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent co-authors in Gulliver's research include:

  • Xiaochang C. Wang
  • Peter T. Weiss
  • John L. Nieber
  • Kees de Hoogh
  • Vinicius J. Taguchi

The scientist has published in several key venues multiple times, indicating regular contributions to leading journals in water and environmental disciplines:

  • Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
  • Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Water Research
  • Water

In addition to journal articles, they authored a book published by UWA Publishing:

  • "Water-Wise Cities and Sustainable Water Systems: Concepts, Technologies, and Applications," 2020

Best Publications

  • A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution

    Gerard Hoek;Rob Beelen;Kees de Hoogh;Danielle Vienneau

  • A regression-based method for mapping traffic-related air pollution: application and testing in four contrasting urban environments

    David J. Briggs;Cornelis de Hoogh;John Gulliver;John Wills

  • Review of dissolved pollutants in urban storm water and their removal and fate in bioretention cells

    Gregory H. LeFevre;Kim H. Paus;Poornima Natarajan;John S. Gulliver

  • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in soils and groundwater of a US metropolitan area: Migration and implications for human exposure

    Unknown

  • Spatial PM2.5, NO2, O3 and BC models for Western Europe - Evaluation of spatiotemporal stability.

    Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;Jie Chen;John Gulliver;Barbara Hoffmann

  • Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) in soils and groundwater of a U.S. metropolitan area: Migration and implications for human exposure

    Feng Xiao;Matt F. Simcik;Thomas R. Halbach;John S. Gulliver

  • Aircraft noise and cardiovascular disease near Heathrow airport in London: small area study

    Anna L Hansell;Anna L Hansell;Marta Blangiardo;Lea Fortunato;Sarah Floud

  • Personal exposure to particulate air pollution in transport microenvironments

    J. Gulliver;D.J. Briggs

  • A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide.

    Jie Chen;Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;John Gulliver;Barbara Hoffmann

  • Review of highway runoff characteristics: comparative analysis and universal implications.

    Masoud Kayhanian;Boaz D. Fruchtman;John S. Gulliver;Comasia Montanaro

  • Are noise and air pollution related to the incidence of dementia? A cohort study in London, England

    Iain M Carey;H Ross Anderson;Richard W Atkinson;Sean D Beevers

  • The exposome in practice: Design of the EXPOsOMICS project.

    P. Vineis;M. Chadeau-Hyam;H. Gmuender;J. Gulliver

  • Road traffic noise is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality in London.

    Jaana I. Halonen;Anna L. Hansell;John Gulliver;David Morley

  • Mechanisms for removal of perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) from drinking water by conventional and enhanced coagulation

    Feng Xiao;Matt F. Simcik;John S. Gulliver

  • Indexing Gas Transfer in Self-Aerated Flows

    John S. Gulliver;John R. Thene;Alan J. Rindels

  • Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight European cohorts within the ELAPSE project: pooled analysis.

    Maciej Strak;Gudrun Weinmayr;Sophia Rodopoulou;Jie Chen

  • Effects of travel mode on exposures to particulate air pollution.

    David J. Briggs;Kees de Hoogh;Chloe Morris;John Gulliver

  • Effects of Monovalent Cations on the Competitive Adsorption of Perfluoroalkyl Acids by Kaolinite: Experimental Studies and Modeling

    Feng Xiao;Xiangru Zhang;Lee Penn;John S. Gulliver

  • Performance Assessment of Rain Gardens1

    Unknown

  • Dasymetric modelling of small-area population distribution using land cover and light emissions data

    David J. Briggs;John Gulliver;Daniela Fecht;Danielle M. Vienneau

  • Capturing phosphates with iron enhanced sand filtration.

    Andrew J. Erickson;John S. Gulliver;Peter T. Weiss

  • Performance assessment of rain gardens

    Brooke C. Asleson;Rebecca S. Nestingen;John S. Gulliver;Raymond M. Hozalski

  • Input characterization of perfluoroalkyl substances in wastewater treatment plants: source discrimination by exploratory data analysis.

    Feng Xiao;Thomas R. Halbach;Matt F. Simcik;John S. Gulliver

  • In-stream flow impact on river water temperatures

    Bashar A. Sinokrot;John S. Gulliver

  • Cost and Pollutant Removal of Storm-Water Treatment Practices

    Peter T. Weiss;John S. Gulliver;Andrew J. Erickson

  • Enhanced Sand Filtration for Storm Water Phosphorus Removal

    Andrew J. Erickson;John S. Gulliver;Peter T. Weiss

  • Hydropower engineering handbook

    John S. Gulliver;Roger E. A. Arndt

  • Impact of bubble and free surface oxygen transfer on diffused aeration systems.

    Connie D DeMoyer;Erica L Schierholz;John S Gulliver;Steven C Wilhelms

  • Remediation to improve infiltration into compact soils

    Nicholas C. Olson;John S. Gulliver;John L. Nieber;Masoud Kayhanian

  • Modeling of phosphorus dynamics in aquatic sediments: I--model development.

    Hong Wang;Adhityan Appan;John S. Gulliver

  • Perfluoroalkyl acids in urban stormwater runoff: influence of land use.

    Feng Xiao;Matt F. Simcik;John S. Gulliver

  • Permeable pavement in northern North American urban areas: research review and knowledge gaps

    Peter T. Weiss;Masoud Kayhanian;John S. Gulliver;Lev Khazanovich

  • PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES IN OXYGEN TRANSFER AT HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES

    John S. Gulliver;Steven C. Wilhelms;Kenneth L. Parkhill

  • Effect of inorganic sediment on whole-stream productivity

    Kenneth L. Parkhill;John S. Gulliver

Frequent Co-Authors

Kees de Hoogh
Kees de Hoogh Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Daniela Fecht
Daniela Fecht Imperial College London
Danielle Vienneau
Danielle Vienneau Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London
John L. Nieber
John L. Nieber University of Minnesota
Gerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek Utrecht University
Sean Beevers
Sean Beevers Imperial College London
Bert Brunekreef
Bert Brunekreef Utrecht University
Raymond M. Hozalski
Raymond M. Hozalski University of Minnesota
Heinz G. Stefan
Heinz G. Stefan University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities, ranging from conservation to resource management. For students seeking flexibility, many online programs offer specialized tracks that complement environmental studies. For instance, exploring the most affordable online general studies degree programs can provide a cost-effective foundation in broad academic skills, which can be tailored towards environmental applications.

If you are considering easing your academic journey while still gaining valuable knowledge, looking into the easiest bachelors degree options related to environmental fields may help balance workload with other commitments.

For those specifically interested in earth sciences, online opportunities like the online geoscience degree programs provide focused education in geology and environmental processes, equipping graduates for roles in research, environmental consulting, or natural resource evaluation.

Additionally, technology-driven paths such as geographic information systems are integral to analyzing and solving environmental challenges. The best GIS undergraduate programs offer specialized training in spatial data handling, making GIS experts valuable in urban planning, environmental monitoring, and sustainability projects.

Best Scientists Citing John S. Gulliver

Trending Scientists