World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 64 2308 2202 64 61 285 16339

Danielle Vienneau publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Danielle Vienneau between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Danielle Vienneau published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2022. 46 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2022. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 9 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 43 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 38 publications 2024: 28 publications 2025: 37 publications 2026: 9 publications
1997 2026

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Danielle Vienneau: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 0
2007 2
2008 2
2009 9
2010 1
2011 9
2012 4
2013 14
2014 11
2015 11
2016 20
2017 11
2018 21
2019 19
2020 19
2021 43
2022 46
2023 38
2024 28
2025 37
2026 9
Total 357
Download as CSV

Danielle Vienneau publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle Vienneau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 285 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130 285
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Danielle Vienneau D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danielle Vienneau sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124 64
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Danielle Vienneau is affiliated with the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute in Switzerland. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science with a strong emphasis on the intersection of environmental factors and health outcomes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

Their work extends into several subfields such as:

  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Pollution
  • Automotive Engineering

Key topics in Danielle Vienneau's research portfolio cover areas including:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Noise Effects and Management
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Vehicle emissions and performance

Frequent co-authors contributing to their research projects include Kees de Hoogh, Martin Röösli, Bénédicte Jacquemin, Evangelia Samoli, and Massimo Stafoggia.

Danielle Vienneau has published extensively in a range of scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets for their research are:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • Environment International
  • Environmental Research
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their recent publications include:

  • Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project, 2022, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight European cohorts within the ELAPSE project: pooled analysis, 2021, BMJ
  • Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and selected health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Environment International
  • Long-term exposure to low-level ambient air pollution and incidence of stroke and coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of six European cohorts within the ELAPSE project, 2021, The Lancet Planetary Health
  • Long-term low-level ambient air pollution exposure and risk of lung cancer - A pooled analysis of 7 European cohorts, 2020, Environment International

Best Publications

  • A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution

    Gerard Hoek;Rob Beelen;Kees de Hoogh;Danielle Vienneau

  • Development of Land Use Regression Models for PM2.5, PM2.5 Absorbance, PM10 and PMcoarse in 20 European Study Areas; Results of the ESCAPE Project

    Marloes Eeftens;Rob Beelen;Kees de Hoogh;Tom Bellander

  • Development of NO2 and NOx land use regression models for estimating air pollution exposure in 36 study areas in Europe - The ESCAPE project

    Rob Beelen;Gerard Hoek;Danielle Vienneau;Marloes Eeftens

  • Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project.

    Unknown

  • Spatial PM2.5, NO2, O3 and BC models for Western Europe - Evaluation of spatiotemporal stability.

    Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;Jie Chen;John Gulliver;Barbara Hoffmann

  • A comparison of linear regression, regularization, and machine learning algorithms to develop Europe-wide spatial models of fine particles and nitrogen dioxide.

    Jie Chen;Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;John Gulliver;Barbara Hoffmann

  • Mapping of background air pollution at a fine spatial scale across the European Union.

    Rob Beelen;Gerard Hoek;Edzer Pebesma;Edzer Pebesma;Danielle Vienneau

  • Long-term exposure to traffic-related air pollution and selected health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Unknown

  • Ambient air pollution and adult asthma incidence in six European cohorts (ESCAPE).

    Bénédicte Jacquemin;Valérie Siroux;Margaux Sanchez;Anne Elie Carsin

  • More than clean air and tranquillity: Residential green is independently associated with decreasing mortality.

    Danielle Vienneau;Kees de Hoogh;David Faeh;Marco Kaufmann

  • The relationship between transportation noise exposure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis.

    Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Christian Schindler;Laura Perez;Nicole Probst-Hensch

  • Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight European cohorts within the ELAPSE project: pooled analysis.

    Maciej Strak;Gudrun Weinmayr;Sophia Rodopoulou;Jie Chen

  • Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands

    Daniela Fecht;Paul Fischer;Léa Fortunato;Gerard Hoek

  • Long-term exposure to low-level ambient air pollution and incidence of stroke and coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of six European cohorts within the ELAPSE project

    Kathrin Wolf;Barbara Hoffmann;Zorana J Andersen;Richard W Atkinson

  • Development of land use regression models for particle composition in twenty study areas in Europe

    Kees de Hoogh;Meng Wang;Martin Adam;Martin Adam;Chiara Badaloni

  • Western european land use regression incorporating satellite- and ground-based measurements of NO2 and PM10

    Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Kees de Hoogh;Matthew J. Bechle;Rob Beelen

  • Dasymetric modelling of small-area population distribution using land cover and light emissions data

    David J. Briggs;John Gulliver;Daniela Fecht;Danielle M. Vienneau

  • Development of West-European PM2.5 and NO2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data

    Kees de Hoogh;John Gulliver;Aaron van Donkelaar;Randall V. Martin

  • Transportation noise exposure and cardiovascular mortality: a nationwide cohort study from Switzerland

    Harris Héritier;Harris Héritier;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Maria Foraster;Maria Foraster;Ikenna Collins Eze;Ikenna Collins Eze

  • A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise.

    Mark Brink;Beat Schäffer;Danielle Vienneau;Maria Foraster

  • Comparing land use regression and dispersion modelling to assess residential exposure to ambient air pollution for epidemiological studies

    Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;Kees de Hoogh;Michal Korek;Danielle Vienneau;Menno Keuken

  • Development and back-extrapolation of NO2 land use regression models for historic exposure assessment in Great Britain.

    John Gulliver;Kees de Hoogh;Anna Hansell;Anna Hansell;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau;Danielle Vienneau

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Röösli
Martin Röösli Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Kees de Hoogh
Kees de Hoogh Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Nicole Probst-Hensch
Nicole Probst-Hensch Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Gerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek Utrecht University
John S. Gulliver
John S. Gulliver University of Minnesota
Bert Brunekreef
Bert Brunekreef Utrecht University
Christian Cajochen
Christian Cajochen University of Basel
Klea Katsouyanni
Klea Katsouyanni National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Barbara Hoffmann
Barbara Hoffmann Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Christian Schindler
Christian Schindler Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences, exploring complementary online degrees can broaden career prospects. Many professionals benefit from advanced public administration skills, making top online MPA programs an attractive option for those interested in environmental policy and sustainable development roles within government and nonprofit sectors.

Understanding societal dynamics is crucial in environmental work, which is why online bachelor's degree programs in sociology can complement an environmental degree. These programs provide insights into human behavior, community engagement, and social impact—skills vital for effective environmental advocacy and program development.

For educators and researchers focused on environmental education, flexible doctoral degrees can be a pathway to career advancement. Options like online EdD programs no dissertation offer streamlined routes to doctorate credentials without the extensive dissertation process, making higher education more accessible.

Additionally, professionals looking to transition from master's to doctoral levels can benefit from online EdS to EdD bridge programs. These programs enable continuous advancement in educational leadership, essential for shaping environmental programs and policies through informed decision-making.

Best Scientists Citing Danielle Vienneau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles