World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7538
World Ranking
6124
National Ranking
475

Daniela Fecht publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Fecht sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 155 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniela Fecht D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniela Fecht sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Long-term exposure to low ambient air pollution concentrations and mortality among 28 million people: results from seven large European cohorts within the ELAPSE project.

    Unknown

  • Aircraft noise and cardiovascular disease near Heathrow airport in London: small area study

    Anna L Hansell;Anna L Hansell;Marta Blangiardo;Lea Fortunato;Sarah Floud

  • Road traffic noise is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and all-cause mortality in London.

    Jaana I. Halonen;Anna L. Hansell;John Gulliver;David Morley

  • Long term exposure to low level air pollution and mortality in eight European cohorts within the ELAPSE project: pooled analysis.

    Maciej Strak;Gudrun Weinmayr;Sophia Rodopoulou;Jie Chen

  • Associations between air pollution and socioeconomic characteristics, ethnicity and age profile of neighbourhoods in England and the Netherlands

    Daniela Fecht;Paul Fischer;Léa Fortunato;Gerard Hoek

  • Long-term exposure to low-level ambient air pollution and incidence of stroke and coronary heart disease: a pooled analysis of six European cohorts within the ELAPSE project

    Kathrin Wolf;Barbara Hoffmann;Zorana J Andersen;Richard W Atkinson

  • Dasymetric modelling of small-area population distribution using land cover and light emissions data

    David J. Briggs;John Gulliver;Daniela Fecht;Danielle M. Vienneau

  • Maximising the effect of combination HIV prevention through prioritisation of the people and places in greatest need: a modelling study.

    Sarah-Jane Anderson;Peter Cherutich;Nduku Kilonzo;Ide Cremin

  • Impact of London's road traffic air and noise pollution on birth weight: retrospective population based cohort study.

    Rachel B Smith;Rachel B Smith;Daniela Fecht;John Gulliver;Sean D Beevers

  • Environmental inequity in England: small area associations between socio-economic status and environmental pollution.

    Unknown

  • Development of an open-source road traffic noise model for exposure assessment

    John Gulliver;David Morley;Danielle Vienneau;Federico Fabbri

  • Road traffic noise, air pollution and incident cardiovascular disease: A joint analysis of the HUNT, EPIC-Oxford and UK Biobank cohorts

    Yutong Cai;Yutong Cai;Susan Hodgson;Marta Blangiardo;John Gulliver

  • Spatial and temporal associations of road traffic noise and air pollution in London: Implications for epidemiological studies.

    Daniela Fecht;Anna L. Hansell;David Morley;David Dajnak

  • Mental health consequences of urban air pollution: prospective population-based longitudinal survey

    Ioannis Bakolis;Ryan Hammoud;Robert Stewart;Robert Stewart;Sean Beevers

  • Long-term low-level ambient air pollution exposure and risk of lung cancer - A pooled analysis of 7 European cohorts.

    Ulla Arthur Hvidtfeldt;Gianluca Severi;Zorana Jovanovic Andersen;Richard Atkinson

  • Socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in exposure to air and noise pollution in London

    Cathryn Tonne;Carles Milà;Daniela Fecht;Mar Alvarez

  • International scale implementation of the CNOSSOS-EU road traffic noise prediction model for epidemiological studies

    D.W. Morley;K. de Hoogh;K. de Hoogh;D. Fecht;F. Fabbri

  • Long-term exposure to low-level air pollution and incidence of asthma: the ELAPSE project

    Unknown

  • Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM2.5, BC, NO2, and O3: An Analysis of European Cohorts in the ELAPSE Project.

    Unknown

  • Associations between Green Space and Health in English Cities: An Ecological, Cross- Sectional Study

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Gulliver
John S. Gulliver University of Minnesota
Kees de Hoogh
Kees de Hoogh Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London
Sean Beevers
Sean Beevers Imperial College London
Danielle Vienneau
Danielle Vienneau Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute
Klea Katsouyanni
Klea Katsouyanni National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Matthias Ketzel
Matthias Ketzel University of Surrey
Gerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek Utrecht University
Frank J. Kelly
Frank J. Kelly Imperial College London
Majid Ezzati
Majid Ezzati Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. An online geology degree offers a strong foundation in earth sciences, which is crucial for understanding natural processes and environmental challenges. Careers in geology often focus on resource management, environmental consulting, and hazard assessment.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a vital role in environmental analysis and planning. Pursuing one of the best GIS graduate programs equips students with skills in spatial data analysis and mapping technologies, essential for tracking environmental changes and supporting sustainable development.

For those aiming to influence environmental policy and public administration, exploring the best online MPA programs can provide leadership training and a deeper understanding of governmental and nonprofit collaboration in environmental issues.

Finally, an online sociology bachelor programs can complement environmental studies by focusing on social behavior and community impact, which are critical for addressing environmental justice and facilitating effective public engagement.

Best Scientists Citing Daniela Fecht

Recently Published Articles