World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johannes C. Eichstaedt

Johannes C. Eichstaedt

Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
37
Citations
9651
World Ranking
745
National Ranking
120

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
10616
World Ranking
8407
National Ranking
4490

Johannes C. Eichstaedt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes C. Eichstaedt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Johannes C. Eichstaedt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes C. Eichstaedt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Johannes C. Eichstaedt is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, sociology and political science, epidemiology, and applied psychology.

The scientist has a notable presence in several research topics, including:

  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Eichstaedt include:

  • "Large language models could change the future of behavioral healthcare: a proposal for responsible development and evaluation" (2024), published in npj Mental Health Research
  • "Using large language models in psychology" (2023), published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Characterizing Geographic Variation in Well-Being Using Tweets" (2021), published in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "The emotional and mental health impact of the murder of George Floyd on the US population" (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: A comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Eichstaedt frequently collaborates with a group of scholars including Lyle Ungar, Salvatore Giorgi, H. Andrew Schwartz, David B. Yaden, and Margaret L. Kern. These collaborations have contributed to an extensive publication record and interdisciplinary research efforts.

The scientist's work is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • npj Mental Health Research

Best Publications

  • Personality, Gender, and Age in the Language of Social Media: The Open-Vocabulary Approach

    H. Andrew Schwartz;Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Margaret L. Kern;Lukasz Dziurzynski

  • Automatic personality assessment through social media language.

    Gregory Park;H. Andrew Schwartz;Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Margaret L. Kern

  • Detecting depression and mental illness on social media: an integrative review

    Sharath Chandra Guntuku;David B Yaden;Margaret L Kern;Lyle H Ungar

  • Facebook language predicts depression in medical records.

    Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Robert J. Smith;Raina M. Merchant;Lyle H. Ungar

  • Psychological Language on Twitter Predicts County-Level Heart Disease Mortality

    Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Hansen Andrew Schwartz;Margaret L. Kern;Gregory Park

  • Characterizing geographic variation in well-being using tweets

    Hansen Andrew Schwartz;Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Margaret L. Kern;Lukasz Dziurzynski

  • Using large language models in psychology

    Unknown

  • The overview effect: Awe and self-transcendent experience in space flight.

    David B. Yaden;Jonathan Iwry;Kelley J. Slack;Johannes C. Eichstaedt

  • Towards Assessing Changes in Degree of Depression through Facebook

    H. Andrew Schwartz;Johannes Eichstaedt;Margaret L. Kern;Gregory Park

  • Developing Age and Gender Predictive Lexica over Social Media

    Maarten Sap;Gregory Park;Johannes Eichstaedt;Margaret Kern

  • Gaining insights from social media language: Methodologies and challenges.

    Margaret L Kern;Gregory Park;Johannes C Eichstaedt;H Andrew Schwartz

  • Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: A comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods.

    Kokil Jaidka;Salvatore Giorgi;H. Andrew Schwartz;Margaret L. Kern

  • Large language models could change the future of behavioral healthcare: a proposal for responsible development and evaluation

    Unknown

  • PREDICTING INDIVIDUAL WELL-BEING THROUGH THE LANGUAGE OF SOCIAL MEDIA.

    H. Andrew Schwartz;Maarten Sap;Margaret L. Kern;Johannes C. Eichstaedt

  • The emotional and mental health impact of the murder of George Floyd on the US population.

    Johannes C. Eichstaedt;Garrick T. Sherman;Salvatore Giorgi;Steven O. Roberts

  • Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.

    Gregory Park;David Bryce Yaden;H. Andrew Schwartz;Margaret L. Kern

  • The role of personality, age, and gender in tweeting about mental illness

    Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro;Johannes Eichstaedt;Gregory Park;Maarten Sap

  • The online social self: An open vocabulary approach to personality.

    Margaret L. Kern;Johannes C. Eichstaedt;H. Andrew Schwartz;Lukasz Dziurzynski

  • Modelling Valence and Arousal in Facebook Posts

    Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro;H. Andrew Schwartz;Gregory Park;Johannes Eichstaedt

  • Understanding and Measuring Psychological Stress Using Social Media

    Sharath Chandra Guntuku;Anneke Buffone;Kokil Jaidka;Johannes C. Eichstaedt

  • Of Roots and Fruits: A Comparison of Psychedelic and Nonpsychedelic Mystical Experiences:

    David B. Yaden;Khoa D. Le Nguyen;Margaret L. Kern;Alexander B. Belser

  • The Role of Personality, Age and Gender in Tweeting about Mental Illnesses

    Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro;Johannes Eichstaedt;Gregory Park;Maarten Sap

Frequent Co-Authors

Lyle H. Ungar
Lyle H. Ungar University of Pennsylvania
H. Andrew Schwartz
H. Andrew Schwartz Stony Brook University
Margaret L. Kern
Margaret L. Kern University of Melbourne
Martin E. P. Seligman
Martin E. P. Seligman University of Pennsylvania
David Stillwell
David Stillwell University of Cambridge
Michal Kosinski
Michal Kosinski Stanford University
Maarten Sap
Maarten Sap Carnegie Mellon University
Martin Obschonka
Martin Obschonka Queensland University of Technology
Ralph W. Hood
Ralph W. Hood University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
David A. Asch
David A. Asch University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of psychology continues to expand, students can choose from a variety of specialized online degrees and certifications that open doors to diverse career paths. For those interested in advanced clinical practice, online apa-accredited psyd programs offer flexible, rigorous pathways to becoming a licensed psychologist. These programs are designed to meet professional standards set by the American Psychological Association, ensuring quality and credibility.

If you are drawn to working with individuals with behavioral challenges, pursuing online bcba certification can prepare you for a rewarding role as a Board Certified Behavior Analyst. This credential opens doors in schools, clinics, and research environments.

Ambitious students may also consider dual masters and psyd programs in clinical psychology, which allow for efficient progression toward clinical licensure and advanced expertise. Those interested in more research-oriented careers or university-level teaching may find a specialized developmental psych phd to be an ideal fit.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes C. Eichstaedt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles