World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8255 7708 4416 4021 104 6600

Joanne Cacciatore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joanne Cacciatore between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joanne Cacciatore published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 5.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2014. 6 of the 109 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2014. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
2007 2025

109 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joanne Cacciatore: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 7
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 10
2013 6
2014 16
2015 7
2016 5
2017 9
2018 5
2019 4
2020 7
2021 4
2022 7
2023 2
2024 3
2025 3
Total 109
Download as CSV

Joanne Cacciatore publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Cacciatore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joanne Cacciatore D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joanne Cacciatore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Joanne Cacciatore is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and works primarily in the field of Psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology. Their research also spans related subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, general health professions, radiological and ultrasound technology, and genetics.

Their research topics prominently include grief, bereavement, and mental health. Additional areas of study covered by their work are migration, health and trauma, family and patient care in intensive care units, human-animal interaction studies, palliative care and end-of-life issues, homelessness and social issues, as well as urban green space and health.

Frequent venues for publication include The Lancet Psychiatry, Death Studies, OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying, PLoS ONE, and BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. This distribution reflects a sustained focus on mental health, grief, and broader health-related social issues.

Some recent notable papers by Joanne Cacciatore include:

  • "What is good grief support? Exploring the actors and actions in social support after traumatic grief" (2021) in PLoS ONE
  • "Evaluating care farming as a means to care for those in trauma and grief" (2020) in Health & Place

Collaborations have been a significant part of their research, working frequently with co-authors such as Kara Thieleman, Richard Gorman, Allen Frances, Mariah Sullivan, and Jennifer Huberty.

Their work addresses complex, multidimensional aspects of grief and trauma, evidenced by studies in varied environments and social conditions, including the effects of trauma on families and the intersection of mental health with broader social health determinants. Their research outputs contribute to the understanding of supportive care practices for individuals experiencing bereavement and trauma in various contexts.

Best Publications

  • Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences

    Alexander E P Heazell;Alexander E P Heazell;Dimitrios Siassakos;Dimitrios Siassakos;Hannah Blencowe;Christy Burden;Christy Burden

  • Stillbirths: why they matter

    J Frederik Frøen;Joanne Cacciatore;Elizabeth M McClure;Oluwafemi Kuti

  • From grief, guilt pain and stigma to hope and pride – a systematic review and meta-analysis of mixed-method research of the psychosocial impact of stillbirth

    Christy Burden;Stephanie Bradley;Claire Storey;Alison Ellis

  • A Risk and Resilience Perspective on Unaccompanied Refugee Minors

    Bonnie E. Carlson;Joanne Cacciatore;Barbara Klimek

  • Support for mothers, fathers and families after perinatal death

    Laura Koopmans;Trish Wilson;Joanne Cacciatore;Vicki Flenady

  • Psychological effects of stillbirth

    Joanne Cacciatore

  • The effects of social support on maternal anxiety and depression after stillbirth

    Joanne Cacciatore;Stephen Schnebly;J. Frederik Froen

  • Witness to Suffering: Mindfulness and Compassion Fatigue among Traumatic Bereavement Volunteers and Professionals

    Kara Thieleman;Joanne Cacciatore

  • Effects of contact with stillborn babies on maternal anxiety and depression.

    Joanne Cacciatore;Ingela Rådestad;J. Frederik Frøen

  • The unique experiences of women and their families after the death of a baby

    Joanne Cacciatore

  • Meeting the needs of parents after a stillbirth or neonatal death

    V Flenady;F Boyle;L Koopmans;T Wilson

  • Effects of support groups on post traumatic stress responses in women experiencing stillbirth.

    Joanne Cacciatore

  • ATTEND: Toward a Mindfulness-Based Bereavement Care Model

    Joanne Cacciatore;Melissa Flint

  • Stillbirth: The Mother's Experience and Implications for Improving Care

    Joanne Cacciatore;Suzanne Bushfield

  • What is good grief support? Exploring the actors and actions in social support after traumatic grief

    Joanne Cacciatore;Kara Thieleman;Ruth Fretts;Lori Barnes Jackson

  • Stillbirth: patient-centered psychosocial care.

    Joanne Cacciatore

  • Problematic emotions and maternal grief.

    Peter Barr;Joanne Cacciatore

  • Seeing and holding a stillborn baby : Mothers' feelings in relation to how their babies were presented to them after birth-Findings from an online questionnaire

    Kerstin Erlandsson;Jane Warland;Joanne Cacciatore;Ingela Rådestad

  • Fatherhood and suffering: A qualitative exploration of Swedish men's experiences of care after the death of a baby

    Joanne Cacciatore;Kerstin Erlandsson;Ingela Rådestad

  • When a Baby Dies: Ambiguity and Stillbirth

    Joanne Cacciatore;John DeFrain;Kara L. C. Jones

  • Mediating Grief: Postmortem Ritualization After Child Death

    Joanne Cacciatore;Melissa Flint

Frequent Co-Authors

Jai K Das
Jai K Das Aga Khan University
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Zulfiqar A Bhutta Aga Khan University
Matthew P. Buman
Matthew P. Buman Arizona State University
Jeremy Shiffman
Jeremy Shiffman Johns Hopkins University
Tine Brink Henriksen
Tine Brink Henriksen Aarhus University Hospital
Elizabeth M. McClure
Elizabeth M. McClure University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in psychology often consider careers in social work, counseling, or human services. Online psychology degrees can be a first step toward roles such as case manager, mental health counselor, or school social worker. However, advancing in these fields usually requires specialized education and specific licensure, which may vary by state.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Pennsylvania generally includes at least a Bachelor’s in Social Work (BSW) for entry-level positions, while clinical roles may require a Master’s (MSW). The Rhode Island minimum degree requirement for social workers also typically starts with a BSW but asks for an MSW for higher-level licensing.

In South Carolina, social worker degree requirements in South Carolina align closely with other states, often requiring practical experience alongside academic credentials. The social worker degree requirements in South Dakota follow similar patterns, underscoring the importance of state-approved degrees and supervised training.

Pursuing an online psychology degree can open doors to a variety of career pathways, but always check the latest state requirements for your chosen profession.

Best Scientists Citing Joanne Cacciatore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles