World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 119 3916 3668 154 150 512 49115

Jo Hermans publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jo Hermans between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jo Hermans published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 1996. 4 of the 526 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 1996. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 6 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 19 publications 1984: 18 publications 1985: 11 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 18 publications 1988: 17 publications 1989: 23 publications 1990: 26 publications 1991: 23 publications 1992: 22 publications 1993: 23 publications 1994: 31 publications 1995: 31 publications 1996: 48 publications 1997: 41 publications 1998: 40 publications 1999: 31 publications 2000: 27 publications 2001: 17 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1959 2025

526 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jo Hermans: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 6
1982 5
1983 19
1984 18
1985 11
1986 8
1987 18
1988 17
1989 23
1990 26
1991 23
1992 22
1993 23
1994 31
1995 31
1996 48
1997 41
1998 40
1999 31
2000 27
2001 17
2002 8
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 5
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 526
Download as CSV

Jo Hermans publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jo Hermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jo Hermans D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jo Hermans sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 119
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jo Hermans is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands, focusing on medical research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work encompasses several subfields, including Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The main topics addressed in Hermans's research include:

  • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
  • Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

They have contributed to multiple publications, especially in well-established venues such as European Urology and Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). The frequent publication venues include:

  • European Urology
  • Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition)

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Hermans are:

  • Oncological impact of perioperative blood transfusion in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Do we need to consider storage time of blood units, donor age or gender matching?, 2024, European Urology
  • The effect of hospital caseload on perioperative mortality, morbidity and costs in bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy: Results from the GRAND study, 2024, European Urology
  • Urinary diversion and quality of life: A six-year follow-up study of bladder cancer surgery, 2025, Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition)
  • A0735 - Discrepancies between physician-assessed and patient-reported complications after cystectomy - a prospective analysis, 2025, European Urology

Hermans has worked frequently with a group of co-authors who have appeared in multiple publications alongside them. These co-authors include:

  • Benedikt Ebner
  • Yannic Volz
  • Alexander Büchner
  • Benazir Enzinger
  • C.G. Stief

Their research contributions largely relate to bladder cancer treatment and surgical outcomes, with an emphasis on perioperative factors, patient quality of life following surgery, and comparative analyses of hospital factors related to surgical results.

Best Publications

  • Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients

    J.J. Bonenkamp;I. Songun;K. Welvaart;C.J.H. van de Velde

  • Treatment of single brain metastasis: Radiotherapy alone or combined with neurosurgery

    C. J. Vecht;H. Haaxma-Reiche;E. M. Noordijk;G. W. Padberg

  • Diagnostic value of standardized assays for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in idiopathic systemic vasculitis

    E. Christiaan Hagen;Mohamed R. Daha;Jo Hermans;Konrad Andrassy

  • Risk assessment for patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia before allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation

    A. Gratwohl;J. Hermans;J. Goldman;W. Arcese

  • Adjuvant therapy after curative resection for gastric cancer: meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    J. Hermans;J. J. Bonenkamp;M. C. Boon;A. M. G. Bunt

  • THE CHOICE OF TREATMENT OF SINGLE BRAIN METASTASIS SHOULD BE BASED ON EXTRACRANIAL TUMOR-ACTIVITY AND AGE

    E. M. Noordijk;C. J. Vecht;H. Haaxma-Reiche;G. W. Padberg

  • Micrometastases and survival in stage II colorectal cancer.

    Liefers Gj;Cleton-Jansen Am;van de Velde Cj;Hermans J

  • Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study.

    F W Jansen;K Kapiteyn;T Trimbos-Kemper;J Hermans

  • Beneficial Effects of Leukocyte Depletion of Transfused Blood on Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Leo M.G. van de Watering;Jo Hermans;Jos G.A. Houbiers;Pieter J. van den Broek

  • Prediction of relapses in Wegener's granulomatosis by measurement of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody levels: a prospective study.

    M. M. Boomsma;C. A. Stegeman;M. J. Van Der Leij;W. Oost

  • Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation versus autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a retrospective case-matched study from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    BB Bjorkstrand;P Ljungman;H Svensson;J Hermans

  • Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study.

    Frank Willem Jansen;Corla B Vredevoogd;Karin Van Ulzen;Jo Hermans

  • The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer.

    Jan P. A. Baak;Herman Van Dop;Piet H. J. Kurver;Jo Hermans

  • No Downstaging After Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Patients

    C.A.M. Marijnen;I.D. Nagtegaal;E. Klein Kranenbarg;J. Hermans

  • Randomised controlled trial comparing transfusion of leucocyte-depleted or buffy-coat-depleted blood in surgery for colorectal cancer

    J.G.A Houbiers;A Brand;L.M.G van de Watering;C.J.H van de Velde

  • Prevention of skin cancer and reduction of keratotic skin lesions during acitretin therapy in renal transplant recipients: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

    J N Bavinck;L M Tieben;F J Van der Woude;A M Tegzess

  • Optimal treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma with mitotane: results in a consecutive series of 96 patients

    Haak Hr;Hermans J;van de Velde Cj;Lentjes Eg

  • Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) with or without Preoperative Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Primary Rectal Cancer: Prospective Randomised Trial with Standard Operative and Histopathological Techniques

    E. Kapiteijn;E. Klein Kranenbarg;W. H. Steup;C. W. Taat

  • Prevention of relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    H. Bootsma;P. Spronk;G. de Boer;P. Limburg

  • Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale.

    H W van Marwijk;P Wallace;G H de Bock;J Hermans

Frequent Co-Authors

Gert Jan Fleuren
Gert Jan Fleuren Leiden University Medical Center
Cees J. Cornelisse
Cees J. Cornelisse Leiden University Medical Center
Jane F. Apperley
Jane F. Apperley Imperial College London
Anneke Brand
Anneke Brand Leiden University Medical Center
Dietger Niederwieser
Dietger Niederwieser Leipzig University
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde Leiden University Medical Center
Jan P. Vandenbroucke
Jan P. Vandenbroucke Leiden University Medical Center
George W. Padberg
George W. Padberg Radboud University
Maria Ponec
Maria Ponec Leiden University
Tapani Ruutu
Tapani Ruutu University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a medical career but want flexible study options, online degrees offer valuable alternatives. Many healthcare professionals start with adn nursing programs, which provide a fast entry point into nursing. These programs often have more accessible admission requirements and can lead to rewarding healthcare roles.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, understanding the average cost of rn to bsn programs is essential. RN to BSN programs are available fully online, reducing costs while accommodating work schedules.

Those holding a non-nursing bachelor's degree can pursue direct entry msn programs online to quickly transition into advanced practice roles. These programs suit students seeking efficient pathways to a master’s in nursing.

For nurses aiming for the highest leadership or research roles, options like online nursing phd programs provide a flexible route to a doctorate degree. Exploring these online pathways widens your options and supports diverse ambitions in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Jo Hermans

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles