World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 122 3492 3261 1920 1771 548 52256

Jay S. Loeffler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jay S. Loeffler between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jay S. Loeffler published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 14.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 58 publications in 2023. 3 of the 611 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 58. Peak 58 publications in 2023. 1983: 3 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 12 publications 1991: 13 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 26 publications 1995: 21 publications 1996: 23 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 17 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 17 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 17 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 22 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 58 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1983 2025

611 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jay S. Loeffler: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 3
1984 2
1985 3
1986 2
1987 1
1988 4
1989 3
1990 12
1991 13
1992 12
1993 13
1994 26
1995 21
1996 23
1997 10
1998 17
1999 20
2000 17
2001 13
2002 16
2003 10
2004 17
2005 17
2006 23
2007 18
2008 20
2009 16
2010 22
2011 26
2012 11
2013 15
2014 21
2015 12
2016 11
2017 21
2018 14
2019 10
2020 14
2021 15
2022 6
2023 58
2024 0
2025 3
Total 611
Download as CSV

Jay S. Loeffler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Loeffler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 541–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 548 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537 548
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jay S. Loeffler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay S. Loeffler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 122–123 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255 122
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2011 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Jay S. Loeffler is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on oncology and related disciplines. Their research spans a variety of topics and subfields, emphasizing genetics, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and oncology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Meningioma and Schwannoma Management
  • Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Jay S. Loeffler has published in several prominent venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (12 publications)
  • Neuro-Oncology (3 publications)
  • Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2 publications)
  • Nature Genetics (1 publication)
  • Nature Reviews Physics (1 publication)

Some of their recent papers include:

  • Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (2020) - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptome profiling of pancreatic cancer identifies multicellular dynamics associated with neoadjuvant treatment (2022) - Nature Genetics
  • Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions (2021) - Nature Reviews Physics
  • Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with recurrent and residual high-grade meningiomas (2022) - Nature Communications
  • Primary dural lymphomas: Clinical presentation, management, and outcome (2020) - Cancer

Frequent collaborators in their research include Helen A. Shih, Kevin Oh, Paul H. Chapman, William T. Curry, and Andrzej Niemierko.

Jay S. Loeffler's work is situated primarily within medicine, addressing critical challenges in cancer diagnosis, treatment, and therapy optimization, especially in the central nervous system and associated disorders.

In recognition of their contributions, Jay S. Loeffler was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014 and was elected a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • AZD2171, a Pan-VEGF Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, Normalizes Tumor Vasculature and Alleviates Edema in Glioblastoma Patients

    Tracy T. Batchelor;A. Gregory Sorensen;A. Gregory Sorensen;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Wei Ting Zhang;Wei Ting Zhang

  • Single dose radiosurgical treatment of recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors and brain metastases: final report of RTOG protocol 90-05.

    Edward Shaw;Charles Scott;Luis Souhami;Robert Dinapoli

  • Angiogenesis in brain tumours

    Rakesh K. Jain;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Dan G. Duda;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer

    Rakesh K Jain;Dan G Duda;Jeffrey W Clark;Jay S Loeffler

  • Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.

    Harald Paganetti;Andrzej Niemierko;Marek Ancukiewicz;Leo E Gerweck

  • Charged particles in radiation oncology

    Marco Durante;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor I Mediates Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Therapy in Primary Human Glioblastoma Cells through Continued Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling

    Arnab Chakravarti;Jay S Loeffler;Nicholas J Dyson

  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Definitive, Noninvasive Treatment of Brain Metastases

    Eben Alexander;Thomas M. Moriarty;Roger B. Davis;Patrick Y. Wen

  • Cellular-Telephone Use and Brain Tumors

    Peter D. Inskip;Robert E. Tarone;Elizabeth E. Hatch;Timothy C. Wilcosky

  • Magnetic resonance image—directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy

    E. Alexander;H. M. Kooy;M. Van Herk;M. Schwartz

  • A multiinstitutional outcome and prognostic factor analysis of radiosurgery for resectable single brain metastasis

    Richard M. Auchter;John P. Lamond;Eben Alexander;John M. Buatti

  • Biomarkers of response and resistance to antiangiogenic therapy.

    Rakesh K. Jain;Dan G. Duda;Christopher G. Willett;Dushyant V. Sahani

  • The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline

    Mark E. Linskey;David W. Andrews;Anthony L. Asher;Stuart H. Burri

  • Phase II Trial of the Antiangiogenic Agent Thalidomide in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Gliomas

    Howard A. Fine;William D. Figg;Kurt Jaeckle;Patrick Y. Wen

  • Tolerance of cranial nerves of the cavernous sinus to radiosurgery

    Roy B Tishler;Jay S Loeffler;L.Dade Lunsford;Christopher Duma

  • Phase II Study of Cediranib, an Oral Pan–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

    Tracy T. Batchelor;Dan G. Duda;Emmanuelle di Tomaso;Marek Ancukiewicz

  • The biology of brain metastases—translation to new therapies

    April F. Eichler;Euiheon Chung;David P. Kodack;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Quantitatively Determined Survivin Expression Levels Are of Prognostic Value in Human Gliomas

    Arnab Chakravarti;Elizabeth Noll;Peter McL. Black;Daniel F. Finkelstein

  • Primary CNS Lymphoma

    Tracy Batchelor;Jay S. Loeffler

  • Management of brain metastases.

    P Y Wen;J S Loeffler

Frequent Co-Authors

Eben Alexander
Eben Alexander Brigham and Women's Hospital
Peter McL. Black
Peter McL. Black University of British Columbia
Nancy J. Tarbell
Nancy J. Tarbell Harvard University
Patrick Y. Wen
Patrick Y. Wen Harvard University
Tracy T. Batchelor
Tracy T. Batchelor Brigham and Women's Hospital
Fred G. Barker
Fred G. Barker Harvard University
Howard A. Fine
Howard A. Fine Cornell University
Herman D. Suit
Herman D. Suit Harvard University
Douglas Kondziolka
Douglas Kondziolka New York University
Rakesh K. Jain
Rakesh K. Jain Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine opens doors to a wide range of related fields and flexible study options. Many future healthcare professionals seek pathways that align with their goals and life circumstances.

For aspiring nurses, some nursing school without teas test requirements can streamline the admission process, saving time and stress. Those interested in leadership positions may consider an accelerated healthcare administration degree to fast-track their entry into management roles within hospitals or clinics.

Registered nurses looking to advance their careers can explore rn to np programs, which bridge the gap toward becoming a nurse practitioner. Additionally, the field of nutrition is growing in importance for both preventative and clinical care. Many students pursue online degrees in nutrition to work in wellness, research, or dietetics.

Each of these online degree pathways offers flexibility and specialized training, providing multiple routes to rewarding healthcare careers beyond traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Jay S. Loeffler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles