World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jan Apelqvist

Jan Apelqvist

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14519 13672 271 258 209 29278

Jan Apelqvist publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Apelqvist between 1989 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Apelqvist published across 36 years, from 1989 to 2024, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2008. 7 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2008. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications
1989 2024

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Apelqvist: publications per year, 1989 to 2024
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 3
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 5
1996 3
1997 5
1998 3
1999 5
2000 8
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 4
2005 4
2006 4
2007 7
2008 22
2009 10
2010 4
2011 13
2012 15
2013 8
2014 6
2015 5
2016 10
2017 13
2018 2
2019 6
2020 12
2021 8
2022 2
2023 5
2024 2
Total 214
Download as CSV

Jan Apelqvist publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Apelqvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 209 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363 209
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Apelqvist D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Apelqvist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Apelqvist is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has contributed extensively to research in the field of medicine, with a particular focus on endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism. Their work spans multiple subfields including surgery, rehabilitation, occupational therapy, and epidemiology.

The primary focus of their research involves diabetic foot ulcer assessment and management, wound healing and treatments, and peripheral artery disease management. Additional topics they have addressed include pressure ulcer prevention and management, diagnosis and treatment of venous diseases, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, and acute ischemic stroke management.

Jan Apelqvist has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • The Lancet
  • Journal of Wound Care
  • Primary Health Care Research & Development
  • Wound Repair and Regeneration

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jan Apelqvist include:

  • Nicolaas C. Schaper
  • Jaap J. van Netten
  • Sicco A. Bus
  • Robert J. Hinchliffe
  • Robert Fitridge

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Jan Apelqvist are:

  • "Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update)", 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • "Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)", 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • "Definitions and criteria for diabetic foot disease", 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • "Practical guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetes-related foot disease (IWGDF 2023 update)", 2023, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • "Guidelines on use of interventions to enhance healing of chronic foot ulcers in diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update)", 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews

This body of work shows a consistent concentration on diabetic foot disease, peripheral artery disease, and chronic wound management, reflecting detailed clinical guidelines and practical recommendations relevant to these conditions.

Best Publications

  • The global burden of diabetic foot disease

    Andrew J M Boulton;Andrew J M Boulton;Loretta Vileikyte;Loretta Vileikyte;Gunnel Ragnarson-Tennvall;Jan Apelqvist

  • Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study

    L. Prompers;N. Schaper;Jan Apelqvist;M. Edmonds

  • High prevalence of ischaemia, infection and serious comorbidity in patients with diabetic foot disease in Europe. Baseline results from the Eurodiale study

    L. Prompers;M. Huijberts;Jan Apelqvist;E. Jude

  • Practical Guidelines on the prevention and management of diabetic foot disease (IWGDF 2019 update)

    Nicolaas C. Schaper;Jaap J. van Netten;Jaap J. van Netten;Jan Apelqvist;Sicco A. Bus

  • Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011

    K. Bakker;Jan Apelqvist;N. C. Schaper

  • Long-term prognosis for diabetic patients with foot ulcers.

    Jan Apelqvist;J Larsson;Carl-David Agardh

  • International consensus and practical guidelines on the management and the prevention of the diabetic foot

    J. Apelqvist;K. Bakker;W. H. van Houtum;M. H. Nabuurs-Franssen

  • What is the most effective way to reduce incidence of amputation in the diabetic foot

    Jan Apelqvist;Jan Larsson

  • Prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: a summary guidance for daily practice 2015, based on the IWGDF guidance documents

    N C Schaper;J J Van Netten;Jan Apelqvist;B A Lipsky;B A Lipsky

  • Decreasing Incidence of Major Amputation in Diabetic Patients: a Consequence of a Multidisciplinary Foot Care Team Approach?

    J Larsson;Jan Apelqvist;Carl-David Agardh;Anders Stenström

  • The 2015 IWGDF guidance documents on prevention and management of foot problems in diabetes: development of an evidence-based global consensus.

    K Bakker;Jan Apelqvist;B A Lipsky;B A Lipsky;J J Van Netten

  • Diabetic foot ulcers in a multidisciplinary setting. An economic analysis of primary healing and healing with amputation.

    J Apelqvist;G Ragnarson-Tennvall;U Persson;J Larsson

  • Resource utilisation and costs associated with the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Prospective data from the Eurodiale Study

    L. Prompers;M. Huijberts;N. Schaper;Jan Apelqvist

  • Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot: based upon the International Consensus on the Diabetic Foot (2007) Prepared by the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot.

    Jan Apelqvist;K Bakker;W H van Houtum;N C Schaper

  • Health-related quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus and foot ulcers

    Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall;Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall;Jan Apelqvist

  • Health-economic consequences of diabetic foot lesions.

    Gunnel Ragnarson Tennvall;Jan Apelqvist

  • Outcomes in controlled and comparative studies on non-healing wounds: recommendations to improve the quality of evidence in wound management

    F. Gottrup;J. Apelqvist;Patricia Elaine Price

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease

    R. J. Hinchliffe;G. Andros;Jan Apelqvist;K. Bakker

  • Complexity of factors related to outcome of neuropathic and neuroischaemic/ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers: a cohort study.

    Magdalena Annersten Gershater;Magnus Löndahl;Per Nyberg;Jan Larsson

  • Chapter V: Diabetic foot.

    M Lepäntalo;M Lepäntalo;J Apelqvist;C Setacci;J-B Ricco

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicolaas C. Schaper
Nicolaas C. Schaper Maastricht University
Robert J. Hinchliffe
Robert J. Hinchliffe University of Bristol
Benjamin A. Lipsky
Benjamin A. Lipsky University of Washington
Edward J. Boyko
Edward J. Boyko University of Washington
Kerstin Brismar
Kerstin Brismar Karolinska Institute
Andrew J.M. Boulton
Andrew J.M. Boulton University of Manchester
David Bergqvist
David Bergqvist Uppsala University
Pär Sparén
Pär Sparén Karolinska Institute
Olof Nyrén
Olof Nyrén Karolinska Institute
Thomas Bjarnsholt
Thomas Bjarnsholt University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but exploring flexible options, online nursing degrees provide excellent alternatives. Many students seek affordable programs—so you may be wondering, what is the cheapest online college for nursing? Finding budget-friendly programs can help reduce student debt and start your healthcare journey with less financial pressure.

For registered nurses wanting to advance, online education offers pathways to earn higher credentials. There are numerous cheap rn to bsn programs designed for working professionals who need to balance study with job responsibilities. Some nurses go further by pursuing online phd nursing programs to move into research, teaching, or advanced practice.

If you are new to the field and don’t already have a nursing background, there are direct entry msn programs for non nurses online. These programs allow career-changers to quickly earn advanced credentials and join the healthcare workforce. With so many flexible online options, the pathway to a rewarding medical career is more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Apelqvist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles