World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
105
Citations
44732
World Ranking
6723
National Ranking
3548

Lawrence A. Lavery publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Lavery sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 404 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Lawrence A. Lavery D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence A. Lavery sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence A. Lavery is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their body of work emphasizes the field of Medicine with a particular focus on Subfields such as Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rehabilitation, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Occupational Therapy.

The research topics covered by Lavery include:

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
  • Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Surgical site infection prevention

Lavery's frequent collaborators have included:

  • Peter A. Crisologo
  • Matthew Malone
  • Dane K. Wukich
  • Arthur Tarricone
  • Orhan K. Öz

The scientist has published many articles in several key venues, notably:

  • Wound Repair and Regeneration
  • International Wound Journal
  • Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
  • Diabetes

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Lavery include:

  • Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update), 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update), 2020, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • IWGDF/IDSA guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes-related foot infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023), 2023, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • Guidelines on the prevention of foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update), 2023, Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews
  • All Feet on Deck: The Role of Podiatry During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Preventing Hospitalizations in an Overburdened Health-Care System, Reducing Amputation and Death in People with Diabetes, 2020, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

In addition to journal articles, Lawrence A. Lavery has authored a book published by the American Diabetes Association titled Clinical Care of the Diabetic Foot, released in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia

    Michael S. Conte;Andrew W. Bradbury;Philippe Kolh;John V. White

  • Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation.

    David G. Armstrong;Lawrence A. Lavery;Lawrence B. Harkless

  • Causal pathways for incident lower-extremity ulcers in patients with diabetes from two settings.

    G. E. Reiber;L. Vileikyte;E. J. Boyko;M. Del Aguila

  • Diabetic Foot Disorders: A Clinical Practice Guideline (2006 Revision)

    Robert G. Frykberg;Thomas Zgonis;David G. Armstrong;Vickie R. Driver

  • Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    David G Armstrong;Lawrence A Lavery

  • Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists

    Andrew J. M. Boulton;David G. Armstrong;Stephen F. Albert;Robert G. Frykberg

  • The natural history of acute Charcot's arthropathy in a diabetic foot specialty clinic

    D. G. Armstrong;W. F. Todd;Lawrence A Lavery;L. B. Harkless

  • Risk factors for foot infections in individuals with diabetes.

    Lawrence A. Lavery;David G. Armstrong;David G. Armstrong;Robert P. Wunderlich;M. Jane Mohler;M. Jane Mohler

  • Off-Loading the Diabetic Foot Wound: A randomized clinical trial

    David G. Armstrong;David G. Armstrong;David G. Armstrong;Hienvu C. Nguyen;Lawrence A. Lavery;Carine H.M. van Schie

  • The costs of diabetic foot: The economic case for the limb salvage team

    Vickie R. Driver;Matteo Fabbi;Lawrence A. Lavery;Gary Gibbons

  • Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment.

    Andrew J M Boulton;David G. Armstrong;Stephen F. Albert;Robert G. Frykberg

  • Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration.

    Lawrence A. Lavery;David G. Armstrong;Steven A. Vela;Terri L. Quebedeaux

  • Diabetic Foot Syndrome: Evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort

    Lawrence A. Lavery;David G. Armstrong;David G. Armstrong;Robert P. Wunderlich;Jeffrey Tredwell

  • Classification of diabetic foot wounds.

    L. A. Lavery;D. G. Armstrong;L. B. Harkless

  • Role of Neuropathy and High Foot Pressures in Diabetic Foot Ulceration

    Robert G. Frykberg;Lawrence A. Lavery;Hau Pham;Carolyn Harvey

  • IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes.

    Benjamin A. Lipsky;Benjamin A. Lipsky;Javier Aragón‐Sánchez;Mathew Diggle;John Embil

  • Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update).

    Benjamin A. Lipsky;Benjamin A. Lipsky;Éric Senneville;Zulfiqarali G. Abbas;Javier Aragón-Sánchez

  • Choosing a Practical Screening Instrument to Identify Patients at Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration

    David G. Armstrong;Lawrence A. Lavery;Steven A. Vela;Terri L. Quebedeaux

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Prevention, Diagnosis and Classification

    David G. Armstrong;Lawrence A. Lavery

  • Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcer Recurrence in High-Risk Patients: Use of temperature monitoring as a self-assessment tool

    Lawrence A. Lavery;Kevin R. Higgins;Dan R. Lanctot;George P. Constantinides

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew J.M. Boulton
Andrew J.M. Boulton University of Manchester
Benjamin A. Lipsky
Benjamin A. Lipsky University of Washington
Kyriacos A. Athanasiou
Kyriacos A. Athanasiou University of California, Irvine
Robert S. Kirsner
Robert S. Kirsner University of Miami
C. Mauli Agrawal
C. Mauli Agrawal The University of Texas at San Antonio
Edward J. Boyko
Edward J. Boyko University of Washington
Michael S. Conte
Michael S. Conte University of California, San Francisco
Dennis P. Orgill
Dennis P. Orgill Brigham and Women's Hospital
Robert J. Hinchliffe
Robert J. Hinchliffe University of Bristol
Victor Aboyans
Victor Aboyans University of Limoges

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the medical field but want alternative or accelerated routes? There are several online degree programs and career pathways that can help you jumpstart your journey in healthcare, often with flexible schedules and faster completion times.

For those considering nursing, online adn programs are a popular choice. These programs allow students to complete their Associate Degree in Nursing conveniently from home, making it easier to balance studies with other commitments.

If you’re interested in the administrative side, an healthcare administration accelerated degree can fast-track your entry into management roles within healthcare organizations. These online options are designed for quick completion without sacrificing quality.

Allied health professions are also in high demand. For example, medical coding and billing classes online with financial aid prepare you for essential behind-the-scenes work in hospitals and clinics, with financial support options available.

If you’re seeking a non-traditional path to nursing, consider absn programs that don't require teas. These programs help you earn your degree faster by removing some standardized testing barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence A. Lavery

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles