World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
8388
World Ranking
7320
National Ranking
2609

James N. Huckins publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Huckins sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James N. Huckins D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James N. Huckins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James N. Huckins is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their work is situated within the scope of governmental and scientific research related to geological and environmental studies conducted under the auspices of this institution.

There are no records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with James N. Huckins in the available data. No information is provided related to book publications or specific fields and subfields of study.

Because the research topics, specific publications, and awards are not documented in the current data set, no additional details on research focus areas or achievements can be summarized.

Best Publications

  • Development of a passive, in situ, integrative sampler for hydrophilic organic contaminants in aquatic environments.

    David A. Alvarez;Jimmie D. Petty;James N. Huckins;Tammy L. Jones-Lepp

  • Semipermeable membrane devices containing model lipid: A new approach to monitoring the bioavaiiability of lipophilic contaminants and estimating their bioconcentration potential

    James N. Huckins;Mark W. Tubergen;Gamini K. Manuweera

  • Lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring organic contaminants in water

    James N. Huckins;Gamini K. Manuweera;Jimmie D. Petty;Donald Mackay

  • Development of the permeability/performance reference compound approach for in situ calibration of semipermeable membrane devices.

    James N. Huckins;Jimmie D. Petty;Jon A. Lebo;Fernanda V. Almeida

  • Determination of uptake kinetics (sampling rates) by lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in water

    James N. Huckins;Jimmie D. Petty;Carl E. Orazio;Jon A. Lebo

  • Comparison of a novel passive sampler to standard water-column sampling for organic contaminants associated with wastewater effluents entering a New Jersey stream

    D.A. Alvarez;P.E. Stackelberg;J.D. Petty;J.N. Huckins

  • Polar organic chemical integrative sampling and liquid chromatography-electrospray/ion-trap mass spectrometry for assessing selected prescription and illicit drugs in treated sewage effluents.

    T. L. Jones-Lepp;D. A. Alvarez;J. D. Petty;J. N. Huckins

  • Considerations involved with the use of semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring environmental contaminants.

    J.D Petty;C.E Orazio;J.N Huckins;R.W Gale

  • A holistic passive integrative sampling approach for assessing the presence and potential impacts of waterborne environmental contaminants.

    J.D Petty;J.N Huckins;D.A Alvarez;W.G Brumbaugh

  • Evaluation of the use of performance reference compounds in an Oasis-HLB adsorbent based passive sampler for improving water concentration estimates of polar herbicides in freshwater.

    Nicolas Mazzella;Sophie Lissalde;Sylvia Moreira;François Delmas

  • Application of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) as passive air samplers

    Jimmie D. Petty;James N. Huckins;James L. Zajicek

  • Chapter 8 Tool for monitoring hydrophilic contaminants in water: polar organic chemical integrative sampler (POCIS)☆

    David A. Alvarez;James N. Huckins;Jimmie D. Petty;Tammy L. Jones-Lepp

  • Chapter 7 Theory, modelling and calibration of passive samplers used in water monitoring

    Kees Booij;Branislav Vrana;James N. Huckins

  • Passive water sampling via semipermfable membrane devices (SPMDS) in concert with bivalves in the Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta

    H.F. Prest;W.M. Jarman;S.A. Burns;T. Weismüller

  • Evaluation of lipid-containing semipermeable membrane devices for monitoring organochlorine contaminants in the Upper Mississippi river

    Geoffrey S. Ellis;Colleen E. Rostad;James N. Huckins;Christopher J. Schmitt

  • Estimation of Uptake Rate Constants for PCB Congeners Accumulated by Semipermeable Membrane Devices and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta)

    John C. Meadows;Kathy R. Echols;James N. Huckins;Frank A. Borsuk

  • Use of semipermeable membrane devices for in situ monitoring of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aquatic environments

    Jon A. Lebo;James L. Zajicek;James N. Huckins;Jimmie D. Petty

  • Field-based evaluation of semipermeable membrane devices (SPMDs) as passive air samplers of polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs)

    Michael E. Bartkow;James N. Huckins;Jochen F. Müller

  • Monitors of organic chemicals in the environment

    James N. Huckins;J. D. Petty;Kees. Booij

  • Trends in monitoring pharmaceuticals and personal-care products in the aquatic environment by use of passive sampling devices

    Graham A Mills;Branislav Vrana;Ian Allan;David A Alvarez

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald E. Tillitt
Donald E. Tillitt United States Geological Survey
William G. Brumbaugh
William G. Brumbaugh United States Geological Survey
Zijian Wang
Zijian Wang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Jochen F. Mueller
Jochen F. Mueller University of Queensland
Edward T. Furlong
Edward T. Furlong United States Geological Survey
Christopher G. Ingersoll
Christopher G. Ingersoll United States Geological Survey
Branislav Vrana
Branislav Vrana Masaryk University
Peter F. Landrum
Peter F. Landrum Southern Illinois University Carbondale
Steven D. Zaugg
Steven D. Zaugg United States Geological Survey
Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Environmental Sciences often involves diverse educational routes, many of which are now accessible online. For those interested in advancing their expertise beyond a bachelor's degree, programs like eds to edd program offer specialized leadership and research opportunities to deepen your impact in environmental policy or education.

For professionals aiming to integrate social work within environmental contexts, the cheapest online dsw programs can provide cost-effective pathways to advanced practice, combining social justice and ecological stewardship.

If you seek flexible learning options that allow exploration across multiple disciplines, consider a budget friendly online general studies degree. This approach supports a broad knowledge base helpful for interdisciplinary environmental careers.

For those new to higher education or looking for less intensive undergraduate options, identifying the easiest bachelor degree to get might be a strategic start, balancing foundational skills with manageable coursework while planning future specialization.

Best Scientists Citing James N. Huckins

Recently Published Articles