World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 51 2058 1894 164 152 117 8063

James L. Weller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James L. Weller between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James L. Weller published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2021. 9 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2021. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James L. Weller: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 6
1997 4
1998 1
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 0
2003 4
2004 7
2005 6
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 5
2010 2
2011 5
2012 3
2013 1
2014 4
2015 7
2016 4
2017 9
2018 3
2019 3
2020 5
2021 12
2022 7
2023 0
2024 6
2025 3
Total 130
Download as CSV

James L. Weller publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Weller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 116–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 117 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253 117
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

James L. Weller D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James L. Weller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122 51
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, photoperiodism, Mutant, Plant physiology and Phytochrome. His studies in Botany integrate themes in fields like Arabidopsis and Gene, Transgene, Locus. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Locus, Gene family, Sativum, Expressed sequence tag, Flowering Locus C and Lotus japonicus is strongly linked to Medicago truncatula.

As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of photoperiodism, focusing on Genetic variation and, on occasion, Adaptation, Phenology, Fabaceae, Repressor and Plant genetics. His Mutant research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Leafy and Cell biology. He studied Plant physiology and Cryptochrome that intersect with Solanum, Arabidopsis thaliana, Chlorophyll, Photomorphogenesis and Solanaceae.

His most cited work include:

  • Manipulation of the Blue Light Photoreceptor Cryptochrome 2 in Tomato Affects Vegetative Development, Flowering Time, and Fruit Antioxidant Content (268 citations)
  • Conservation of Arabidopsis Flowering Genes in Model Legumes (236 citations)
  • The Pea GIGAS Gene Is a FLOWERING LOCUS T Homolog Necessary for Graft-Transmissible Specification of Flowering but Not for Responsiveness to Photoperiod (133 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

James L. Weller mainly focuses on Botany, Mutant, Genetics, Plant physiology and Gene. James L. Weller has researched Botany in several fields, including Cryptochrome and Photomorphogenesis. His study in the fields of Complementation under the domain of Mutant overlaps with other disciplines such as Phytochrome.

His research integrates issues of Phenotype, Chlorophyll and Shoot in his study of Plant physiology. Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Phaseolus under Gene, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Gene pool. His Arabidopsis study also includes

  • Medicago which connect with Flowering Locus C,
  • Medicago truncatula, which have a strong connection to Lotus japonicus.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (55.05%)
  • Mutant (41.28%)
  • Genetics (32.11%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Gene (31.19%)
  • Genetics (32.11%)
  • photoperiodism (29.36%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

James L. Weller focuses on Gene, Genetics, photoperiodism, Adaptation and Locus. His biological study focuses on Arabidopsis. His Arabidopsis research is within the category of Mutant.

His work in the fields of Transcription Factor Gene and Flowering Locus C overlaps with other areas such as Cyclin. Photoperiodism is the subject of his research, which falls under Botany. James L. Weller combines subjects such as Quantitative trait locus, Phaseolus, Gene pool and Phytochrome A with his study of Locus.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication. (35 citations)
  • BIGGER ORGANS and ELEPHANT EAR-LIKE LEAF1 control organ size and floral organ internal asymmetry in pea. (18 citations)
  • Parallel origins of photoperiod adaptation following dual domestications of common bean. (14 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

James L. Weller spends much of his time researching photoperiodism, Domestication, Gene, Locus and Evolutionary biology. James L. Weller combines topics linked to Dormancy with his work on photoperiodism. He connects Gene with Phytochrome in his study.

His Locus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quantitative trait locus, Gene cluster, Florigen and Phenology. His studies deal with areas such as Adaptation, Plant genetics, Germplasm and Crop as well as Evolutionary biology.

Best Publications

  • Manipulation of the Blue Light Photoreceptor Cryptochrome 2 in Tomato Affects Vegetative Development, Flowering Time, and Fruit Antioxidant Content

    Leonardo Giliberto;Gaetano Perrotta;Patrizia Pallara;James L. Weller

  • Natural variation at the soybean J locus improves adaptation to the tropics and enhances yield

    Sijia Lu;Sijia Lu;Xiaohui Zhao;Xiaohui Zhao;Yilong Hu;Shulin Liu

  • Conservation of Arabidopsis Flowering Genes in Model Legumes

    Valérie Hecht;Fabrice Foucher;Cristina Ferrándiz;Richard Macknight

  • Stepwise selection on homeologous PRR genes controlling flowering and maturity during soybean domestication.

    Sijia Lu;Sijia Lu;Lidong Dong;Chao Fang;Shulin Liu

  • Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in the Genomic Era

    Petr Smýkal;Gregoire Aubert;Judith Burstin;Clarice J. Coyne

  • The Pea GIGAS Gene Is a FLOWERING LOCUS T Homolog Necessary for Graft-Transmissible Specification of Flowering but Not for Responsiveness to Photoperiod

    Valérie Hecht;Rebecca E. Laurie;Jacqueline K. Vander Schoor;Stephen Ridge

  • Genetic control of flowering time in legumes

    James L. Weller;Raúl Ortega

  • A conserved molecular basis for photoperiod adaptation in two temperate legumes

    James L. Weller;Lim Chee Liew;Valérie F. G. Hecht;Vinodan Rajandran

  • A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant–microbe interactions and legume evolution

    James K. Hane;Yao Ming;Lars G. Kamphuis;Matthew N. Nelson

  • A study of gibberellin homeostasis and cryptochrome-mediated blue light inhibition of hypocotyl elongation

    Xiaoying Zhao;Xuhong Yu;Eloise Foo;Gregory M. Symons

  • The Medicago FLOWERING LOCUS T Homolog, MtFTa1, Is a Key Regulator of Flowering Time

    Rebecca E. Laurie;Payal Diwadkar;Mauren Jaudal;Lulu Zhang

  • Molecular mechanisms for the photoperiodic regulation of flowering in soybean

    Xiaoya Lin;Baohui Liu;Baohui Liu;James L. Weller;Jun Abe

  • Pea LATE BLOOMER1 Is a GIGANTEA Ortholog with Roles in Photoperiodic Flowering, Deetiolation, and Transcriptional Regulation of Circadian Clock Gene Homologs

    Valérie Hecht;Claire L. Knowles;Jacqueline K. Vander Schoor;Lim Chee Liew

  • Pea mutants with reduced sensitivity to far-red light define an important role for phytochrome A in day-length detection

    James L. Weller;Ian C. Murfet;James B. Reid

  • The genetic control of flowering in pea

    James L. Weller;James B. Reid;Scott A. Taylor;Ian C. Murfet

  • Tendril-less Regulates Tendril Formation in Pea Leaves

    Julie Hofer;Lynda Turner;Carol Moreau;Mike Ambrose

  • Genetic basis and adaptation trajectory of soybean from its temperate origin to tropics.

    Lidong Dong;Chao Fang;Qun Cheng;Tong Su

  • Axillary Meristem Development. Budding Relationships between Networks Controlling Flowering, Branching, and Photoperiod Responsiveness

    Christine A. Beveridge;James L. Weller;Susan R. Singer;Julie M.I. Hofer

  • Light Regulation of Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Pea Is Mediated through the COP1/HY5 Pathway

    James L. Weller;Valérie Hecht;Jacqueline K. Vander Schoor;Sandra E. Davidson

  • A critical role of the soybean evening complex in the control of photoperiod sensitivity and adaptation.

    Tiantian Bu;Sijia Lu;Kai Wang;Lidong Dong

  • Light-Induced Nuclear Translocation of Endogenous Pea Phytochrome A Visualized by Immunocytochemical Procedures

    Akiko Hisada;Hiroko Hanzawa;James L. Weller;Akira Nagatani

  • Genetic dissection of blue-light sensing in tomato using mutants deficient in cryptochrome 1 and phytochromes A, B1 and B2

    J.L. Weller;Gaetano Perrotta;M.E.L. Schreuder;A. Van Tuinen

  • Gibberellins and phytochrome regulation of stem elongation in pea

    James L. Weller;John J. Ross;James B. Reid

Frequent Co-Authors

James B. Reid
James B. Reid University of Tasmania
Eloise Foo
Eloise Foo University of Tasmania
Ian C. Murfet
Ian C. Murfet University of Tasmania
Fanjiang Kong
Fanjiang Kong Chinese Academy of Sciences
John Ross
John Ross University of Tasmania
Richard E. Kendrick
Richard E. Kendrick University of Tasmania
Kirankumar S. Mysore
Kirankumar S. Mysore Oklahoma State University
Jiangqi Wen
Jiangqi Wen Oklahoma State University
René E. Vaillancourt
René E. Vaillancourt University of Tasmania
Rafael Lozano
Rafael Lozano University of Almería

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James L. Weller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles