World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ilaria Pertot

Ilaria Pertot

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 51 2046 1883 63 62 266 8522

Ilaria Pertot publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilaria Pertot between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilaria Pertot published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2013. 9 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2013. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1993 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilaria Pertot: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 19
2003 6
2004 3
2005 6
2006 10
2007 6
2008 17
2009 21
2010 10
2011 10
2012 20
2013 31
2014 13
2015 17
2016 20
2017 20
2018 9
2019 7
2020 11
2021 18
2022 7
2023 3
2024 5
2025 4
Total 295
Download as CSV

Ilaria Pertot publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilaria Pertot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 266–270 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 266 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35 266
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Ilaria Pertot D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilaria Pertot sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122 51
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • Plasmopara viticola: a review of knowledge on downy mildew of grapevine and effective disease management

    Cesare Gessler;Ilaria Pertot;Michele Perazzolli

  • A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture

    I Pertot;Tito Caffi;Vittorio Rossi;L. Mugnai

  • Climate Change Impacts on Plant Pathogens and Plant Diseases

    Yigal Elad;Ilaria Pertot

  • Plant Hosts of Botrytis spp.

    Yigal Elad;Ilaria Pertot;Alba Marina Cotes Prado;Alison Stewart

  • Induction of systemic resistance against Plasmopara viticola in grapevine by Trichoderma harzianum T39 and benzothiadiazole

    Michele Perazzolli;Silvia Dagostin;Alessandro Ferrari;Yigal Elad

  • Fungal Endophytic Communities in Grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.) Respond to Crop Management

    Unknown

  • Resilience of the natural phyllosphere microbiota of the grapevine to chemical and biological pesticides

    Michele Perazzolli;Livio Antonielli;Michelangelo Storari;Gerardo Puopolo

  • Linking Genomics and Ecology to Investigate the Complex Evolution of an Invasive Drosophila Pest

    Lino Ometto;Alessandro Cestaro;Sukanya Ramasamy;Alberto Grassi

  • Downy mildew resistance induced by Trichoderma harzianum T39 in susceptible grapevines partially mimics transcriptional changes of resistant genotypes

    Michele Perazzolli;Marco Moretto;Paolo Fontana;Alberto Ferrarini

  • Are there alternatives to copper for controlling grapevine downy mildew in organic viticulture?

    Unknown

  • Trichoderma harzianum T39 induces resistance against downy mildew by priming for defense without costs for grapevine

    Michele Perazzolli;Benedetta Roatti;Elisa Bozza;Ilaria Pertot

  • Importance of secondary inoculum of Plasmopara viticola to epidemics of grapevine downy mildew

    Davide Gobbin;Mauro Jermini;B. Loskill;Ilaria Pertot

  • Identification of Microsatellite Markers for Plasmopara viticola and Establishment of High throughput Method for SSR Analysis

    Davide Gobbin;Ilaria Pertot;Cesare Gessler

  • Bacterial Endophytic Communities in the Grapevine Depend on Pest Management

    Unknown

  • Combining biocontrol agents with different mechanisms of action in a strategy to control Botrytis cinerea on grapevine

    Ilaria Pertot;Oscar Giovannini;Maddalena Benanchi;Tito Caffi

  • Lysobacter capsici AZ78 produces cyclo(L-Pro-L-Tyr), a 2,5-diketopiperazine with toxic activity against sporangia of Phytophthora infestans and Plasmopara viticola.

    G. Puopolo;A. Cimmino;M.C. Palmieri;O. Giovannini

  • Inhibition of Sporulation and Ultrastructural Alterations of Grapevine Downy Mildew by the Endophytic Fungus Alternaria alternata

    R Musetti;A Vecchione;L Stringher;S Borselli

  • Development of a High-Throughput Method for Quantification of Plasmopara viticola DNA in Grapevine Leaves by Means of Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction.

    Giorgia Valsesia;Davide Gobbin;Andrea Patocchi;A. Vecchione

  • Effect of climatic factors on powdery mildew caused by Sphaerotheca macularis f. sp. fragariae on strawberry

    Liat Amsalem;Stanley Freeman;Dalia Rav-David;Yehuda Nitzani

  • Impact of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride SC1 on soil microbial communities of a vineyard in northern Italy

    Federica Savazzini;Claudia Maria Oliveira Longa;Ilaria Pertot

  • Real-time PCR for detection and quantification of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride strain SC1 in soil

    Federica Savazzini;Claudia Maria Oliveira Longa;Ilaria Pertot;Cesare Gessler

  • Vf scab resistance of Malus

    Cesare Gessler;Ilaria Pertot

  • Microbial community structure in vineyard soils across altitudinal gradients and in different seasons

    Paola E. Corneo;Alberto Pellegrini;Luca Cappellin;Marco Roncador

  • Evaluating the survival and environmental fate of the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride SC1 in vineyards in northern Italy.

    C.M.O. Longa;F. Savazzini;S. Tosi;Y. Elad

  • Trichoderma atroviride SC1 prevents Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Phaeoacremonium aleophilum infection of grapevine plants during the grafting process in nurseries

    Ilaria Pertot;Daniele Prodorutti;Andrea Colombini;Luca Pasini

  • Impact of the omic technologies for understanding the modes of action of biological control agents against plant pathogens

    Sebastien Massart;Michele Perazzolli;Monica Höfte;Ilaria Pertot

  • Farmers’ attitudes toward the use of biocontrol agents in IPM strawberry production in three countries

    Riccarda Moser;Ilaria Pertot;Yigal Elad;Roberta Raffaelli

  • Soil microbiota respond to green manure in organic vineyards

    Claudia M. O. Longa;Lidia Nicola;Livio Antonielli;Enzo Mescalchin

  • Smelling a diseased host: grapevine moth responses to healthy and fungus-infected grapes

    Marco Tasin;Geir K. Knudsen;Ilaria Pertot

  • Identificator: A web-based tool for visual plant disease identification, a proof of concept with a case study on strawberry

    Ilaria Pertot;Tsvi Kuflik;Igor Gordon;Stanley Freeman

  • Fumigation with dazomet modifies soil microbiota in apple orchards affected by replant disease

    Lidia Nicola;Elena Turco;Davide Albanese;Claudio Donati

  • Lysobacter capsici AZ78 can be combined with copper to effectively control Plasmopara viticola on grapevine

    Gerardo Puopolo;Oscar Giovannini;Ilaria Pertot

  • Temperature drives the assembly of endophytic communities' seasonal succession.

    Andrea Campisano;Davide Albanese;Sohail Yousaf;Michael Pancher

  • Emission of volatile sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes in grapevine genotypes following Plasmopara viticola inoculation in vitro.

    Alberto Algarra Alarcon;Valentina Lazazzara;Luca Cappellin;Pier Luigi Bianchedi

  • Diversity in Endophyte Populations Reveals Functional and Taxonomic Diversity between Wild and Domesticated Grapevines

    Andrea Campisano;Michael Pancher;Gerardo Puopolo;Antonio Puddu

  • Optimization of copper treatments in organic viticulture by using a web-based decision support system

    Tsvi Kuflik;Daniele Prodorutti;Andrea Frizzi;Yochai Gafni

  • Plant Diseases and Their Management in Organic Agriculture

    M. Finckh;A. van Bruggen;L. Tamm;N. Lampkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Cesare Gessler
Cesare Gessler ETH Zurich
Michele Perazzolli
Michele Perazzolli University of Trento
Vittorio Rossi
Vittorio Rossi Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Riccardo Velasco
Riccardo Velasco The Canadian Real Estate Association
Laura Mugnai
Laura Mugnai University of Florence
Cesare Furlanello
Cesare Furlanello Fondazione Bruno Kessler
Tsvi Kuflik
Tsvi Kuflik University of Haifa
Yigal Elad
Yigal Elad Agricultural Research Organization
Rita Musetti
Rita Musetti University of Padua
Urska Vrhovsek
Urska Vrhovsek Fondazione Edmund Mach

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ilaria Pertot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles