World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Traud Winkelmann

Traud Winkelmann

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
36
Citations
3883
World Ranking
4977
National Ranking
305

Traud Winkelmann publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Traud Winkelmann sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 173 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Traud Winkelmann D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Traud Winkelmann sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Apple Replant Disease: Causes and Mitigation Strategies.

    Traud Winkelmann;Kornelia Smalla;Wulf Amelung;Gerhard Baab

  • Evaluation of apple replant problems based on different soil disinfection treatments—links to soil microbial community structure?

    Bunlong Yim;Kornelia Smalla;Traud Winkelmann

  • Proteomic analyses of somatic and zygotic embryos of Cyclamen persicum Mill. reveal new insights into seed and germination physiology.

    Traud Winkelmann;Dimitri Heintz;Alain Van Dorsselaer;Margrethe Serek

  • Genomes of the Venus Flytrap and Close Relatives Unveil the Roots of Plant Carnivory

    Gergo Palfalvi;Thomas Hackl;Niklas Terhoeven;Tomoko F. Shibata

  • Endophytic bacteria in plant tissue culture: differences between easy- and difficult-to-propagate Prunus avium genotypes

    Mona Quambusch;Anna Maria Pirttilä;Mysore V Tejesvi;Traud Winkelmann

  • Commercial in vitro plant production in Germany in 1985–2004

    Traud Winkelmann;Thomas Geier;Walter Preil

  • Degradation of Biofumigant Isothiocyanates and Allyl Glucosinolate in Soil and Their Effects on the Microbial Community Composition

    Franziska S. Hanschen;Bunlong Yim;Traud Winkelmann;Kornelia Smalla

  • Comparative proteomic analysis of early somatic and zygotic embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L.

    Alexandre Mboene Noah;Nicolas Niemenak;Stephanie Sunderhaus;Christin Haase

  • Cryopreservation of embryogenic suspension cultures of Cyclamen persicum Mill.

    Traud Winkelmann;Viola Mußmann;Margrethe Serek

  • Induction and diagnosis of apple replant disease (ARD) : a matter of heterogeneous soil properties?

    Felix Mahnkopp;Margaux Simon;Eva Lehndorff;Stefan Pätzold

  • Effects of Soil Pre-Treatment with Basamid® Granules, Brassica juncea, Raphanus sativus, and Tagetes patula on Bacterial and Fungal Communities at Two Apple Replant Disease Sites.

    Bunlong Yim;Bunlong Yim;Heike Nitt;Andreas Wrede;Samuel Jacquiod

  • Diagnosis of apple replant disease (ARD): Microscopic evidence of early symptoms in fine roots of different apple rootstock genotypes

    G. Grunewaldt-Stöcker;F. Mahnkopp;C. Popp;E. Maiss

  • From callus to embryo: a proteomic view on the development and maturation of somatic embryos in Cyclamen persicum

    Christina Rode;Kathrin Lindhorst;Hans-Peter Braun;Traud Winkelmann

  • Flow cytometric analyses in embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus lines of Cyclamen persicum Mill.: relation between ploidy level and competence for somatic embryogenesis

    T. Winkelmann;R. S. Sangwan;H.-G. Schwenkel

  • CO2 accumulation in bioreactor suspension cultures of Cyclamen persicum Mill. and its effect on cell growth and regeneration of somatic embryos

    A. Hohe;T. Winkelmann;H.-G. Schwenkel

  • Nutritional compound analysis and morphological characterization of spider plant (Cleome gynandra) - an African indigenous leafy vegetable.

    Emmanuel O. Omondi;Christof Engels;Godfrey Nambafu;Monika Schreiner

  • Effects of biofumigation using Brassica juncea and Raphanus sativus in comparison to disinfection using Basamid on apple plant growth and soil microbial communities at three field sites with replant disease

    Bunlong Yim;Bunlong Yim;Franziska S. Hanschen;Andreas Wrede;Heike Nitt

  • Different bacterial communities in heat and gamma irradiation treated replant disease soils revealed by 16S rRNA gene analysis – contribution to improved aboveground apple plant growth?

    Bunlong Yim;Traud Winkelmann;Guo-Chun Ding;Kornelia Smalla

  • Transcriptomic analysis of molecular responses in Malus domestica ‘M26’ roots affected by apple replant disease

    Stefan Weiß;Melanie Bartsch;Traud Winkelmann

  • Impaired defense reactions in apple replant disease-affected roots of Malus domestica 'M26'.

    Stefan Weiß;Benye Liu;Dennis Reckwell;Ludger Beerhues

  • Enolases: storage compounds in seeds? Evidence from a proteomic comparison of zygotic and somatic embryos of Cyclamen persicum Mill.

    Christina Rode;Sébastien Gallien;Dimitri Heintz;Alain Van Dorsselaer

  • Protoplast isolation and plant regeneration of different genotypes of Petunia and Calibrachoa

    L. Meyer;M. Serek;T. Winkelmann

  • Variability in Osmotic Stress Tolerance of Starch Potato Genotypes (Solanum tuberosum L.) as Revealed by an In Vitro Screening: Role of Proline, Osmotic Adjustment and Drought Response in Pot Trials

    C. Bündig;T. H. Vu;P. Meise;S. Seddig

Frequent Co-Authors

Margrethe Serek
Margrethe Serek University of Hannover
Thomas Debener
Thomas Debener University of Hannover
Hans-Peter Braun
Hans-Peter Braun University of Hannover
Henryk Flachowsky
Henryk Flachowsky Julius Kühn-Institut
Monika Schreiner
Monika Schreiner Leibniz Association
Doris Vetterlein
Doris Vetterlein Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Søren J. Sørensen
Søren J. Sørensen University of Copenhagen
Hans-Jörg Vogel
Hans-Jörg Vogel Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Wulf Amelung
Wulf Amelung University of Bonn
Magda-Viola Hanke
Magda-Viola Hanke Julius Kühn-Institut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Traud Winkelmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles