World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8543 7977 4569 4160 95 6802

Matthew M. Kurtz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew M. Kurtz between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew M. Kurtz published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2012. 9 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2012. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1994 2025

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew M. Kurtz: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 4
2002 0
2003 4
2004 4
2005 5
2006 3
2007 2
2008 4
2009 4
2010 3
2011 5
2012 9
2013 5
2014 3
2015 6
2016 8
2017 5
2018 4
2019 4
2020 3
2021 3
2022 3
2023 5
2024 5
2025 4
Total 107
Download as CSV

Matthew M. Kurtz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Kurtz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew M. Kurtz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew M. Kurtz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew M. Kurtz is affiliated with Wesleyan University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of psychology and medicine. Their work has a focus on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, philosophy, and social psychology. Their research topics predominantly revolve around schizophrenia research and treatment, mental health and psychiatry, mental health research topics, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, psychoanalysis and psychopathology research, and psychotherapy techniques and applications.

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including:

  • "A Meta-analysis of Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia: Efficacy and the Role of Participant and Treatment Factors" (2021) in Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • "A meta-analysis of the effects of social-cognitive training in schizophrenia: The role of treatment characteristics and study quality" (2021) in British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • "A meta-analysis of social cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: Does world region matter?" (2022) in Schizophrenia Research
  • "The alliance-outcome relationship in individual psychosocial treatment for schizophrenia and early psychosis: A meta-analysis" (2021) in Schizophrenia Research
  • "A meta-analytic investigation of cognitive remediation for mood disorders: Efficacy and the role of study quality, sample and treatment factors" (2023) in Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent coauthors of Matthew M. Kurtz include:

  • David L. Penn
  • Grace Melville
  • Emily Gagen
  • Sérgio Machado
  • Nuno Rocha

Their work is frequently published in venues such as:

  • Schizophrenia Research
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • UNC Libraries
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Best Publications

  • A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Research on Social Skills Training for Schizophrenia.

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Kim T. Mueser

  • Social Cognitive Training for Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Controlled Research

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Christi L. Richardson

  • A Meta-analytic Investigation of Neurocognitive Deficits in Bipolar Illness: Profile and Effects of Clinical State

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Raphael T. Gerraty

  • Neurocognitive impairment across the lifespan in schizophrenia: an update

    Matthew M. Kurtz

  • Approaches to cognitive remediation of neuropsychological deficits in schizophrenia: a review and meta-analysis.

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Paul J. Moberg;Ruben C. Gur;Raquel E. Gur

  • Computer-Assisted Cognitive Remediation in Schizophrenia: What is the Active Ingredient?

    Matthew M. Kurtz;James C. Seltzer;Dana S. Shagan;Warren R. Thime

  • Neurocognitive Predictors of Objective and Subjective Quality of Life in Individuals With Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analytic Investigation

    Arielle W. Tolman;Matthew M. Kurtz

  • Comprehensive treatments for social cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: A critical review and effect-size analysis of controlled studies.

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Matthew M. Kurtz;Emily Gagen;Nuno B.F. Rocha;Sergio Machado

  • Comparison of the continuous performance test with and without working memory demands in healthy controls and patients with schizophrenia.

    Matthew M Kurtz;J.Daniel Ragland;Warren Bilker;Ruben C Gur

  • Symptoms Versus Neurocognitive Test Performance as Predictors of Psychosocial Status in Schizophrenia: A 1- and 4-Year Prospective Study

    Matthew M Kurtz;Paul J Moberg;J Daniel Ragland;Ruben C Gur

  • Adjunctive pharmacotherapy for cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: meta-analytical investigation of efficacy

    Kee-Hong Choi;Til Wykes;Matthew M. Kurtz

  • Predictors of change in life skills in schizophrenia after cognitive remediation

    Matthew M. Kurtz;James C. Seltzer;Marco Fujimoto;Dana S. Shagan

  • Neuropsychological functioning in hoarding disorder

    David F. Tolin;Anna Villavicencio;Andrea Umbach;Matthew M. Kurtz

  • Symptoms versus neurocognition as predictors of change in life skills in schizophrenia after outpatient rehabilitation.

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Matthew M. Kurtz;Bruce E. Wexler;Marco Fujimoto;Dana S. Shagan

  • The Penn Conditional Exclusion Test: a new measure of executive-function with alternate forms for repeat administration

    Matthew M Kurtz;J Daniel Ragland;Paul J Moberg;Ruben C Gur

  • Abnormal hemodynamics in schizophrenia during an auditory oddball task.

    Kent A. Kiehl;Michael C. Stevens;Kim Celone;Matthew Kurtz

  • Elementary neurocognitive function, facial affect recognition and social-skills in schizophrenia

    Melissa B. Meyer;Matthew M. Kurtz

  • A Virtual Reality Apartment as a Measure of Medication Management Skills in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Pilot Study

    Matthew M. Kurtz;Elizabeth Baker;Godfrey D. Pearlson;Robert S. Astur

  • Neurocognition as a predictor of response to evidence-based psychosocial interventions in schizophrenia: What is the state of the evidence?

    Matthew M. Kurtz

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce E. Wexler
Bruce E. Wexler Yale University
Godfrey D. Pearlson
Godfrey D. Pearlson Yale University
Ruben C. Gur
Ruben C. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Kim T. Mueser
Kim T. Mueser Boston University
Raquel E. Gur
Raquel E. Gur University of Pennsylvania
Robert S. Astur
Robert S. Astur University of Connecticut
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Warren B. Bilker
Warren B. Bilker University of Pennsylvania
David F. Tolin
David F. Tolin Yale University
J. Daniel Ragland
J. Daniel Ragland University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens the door to a range of specialized career options in the USA. One growing field is industrial-organizational (IO) psychology. If you're interested in this area, it's important to review the industrial organizational psychology prerequisites to understand the educational and licensing requirements involved.

Students often debate whether to become a psychologist or psychiatrist. Each role offers distinct career and educational paths. To make an informed decision, learn more by comparing the key differences in psychologist vs psychiatrist careers.

Within IO psychology, graduates can choose from a range of dynamic work environments. Common io psychology jobs include roles within human resources, talent management, and workplace training. These positions require both scientific knowledge and practical people skills.

For those seeking long-term professional growth, the field offers numerous advancement opportunities. Discover a broader overview of io psychology careers and how online degree options can help you achieve your goals in this rewarding sector.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew M. Kurtz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles