World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Herman N. Eisen

Herman N. Eisen

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
83
Citations
23953
World Ranking
3512
National Ranking
1764

Herman N. Eisen publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herman N. Eisen sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 255 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Herman N. Eisen D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Herman N. Eisen sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - AAI Lifetime Achievement Award, American Association of Immunologists
  • 1969 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1965 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Herman N. Eisen was affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Throughout their career, the scientist contributed to the academic and research community, focused on advancing knowledge in their area of expertise.

While specific details about Eisen's recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, fields of study, subfields, and topics of work are not available, recognition received during their career provides insight into their standing within the scientific community.

Eisen was a recipient of several professional honors. They were awarded the AAI Lifetime Achievement Award by the American Association of Immunologists in 1997. They were also elected as a member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1969, indicating a recognized impact in their field. Additionally, Eisen became a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1965.

The timeline of these awards suggests a sustained career with influence reaching into the later decades of the 20th century. The association with MIT further places Eisen within a major center of research and innovation.

Eisen's scientific contributions, formal affiliations, and awards collectively reflect a career engaged with the broader scientific community on both national and international levels.

Best Publications

  • VARIATIONS IN AFFINITIES OF ANTIBODIES DURING THE IMMUNE RESPONSE.

    Unknown

  • Evidence that a Single Peptide–MHC Complex on a Target Cell Can Elicit a Cytolytic T Cell Response

    Yuri Sykulev;Michael Joo;Irina Vturina;Theodore J. Tsomides

  • Complete primary structure of a heterodimeric T-cell receptor deduced from cDNA sequences.

    Haruo Saito;David M. Kranz;Yohtaroh Takagaki;Adrian C. Hayday

  • RNA interference of influenza virus production by directly targeting mRNA for degradation and indirectly inhibiting all viral RNA transcription

    Qing Ge;Michael T. McManus;Tam Nguyen;Ching-Hung Shen

  • Homeostasis-Stimulated Proliferation Drives Naive T Cells to Differentiate Directly into Memory T Cells

    Bryan K. Cho;Varada P. Rao;Qing Ge;Herman N. Eisen

  • A third rearranged and expressed gene in a clone of cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

    Haruo Saito;David M. Kranz;Yohtaroh Takagaki;Adrian C. Hayday

  • Inhibition of influenza virus production in virus-infected mice by RNA interference

    Qing Ge;Lily Filip;Ailin Bai;Tam Nguyen

  • Structure, organization, and somatic rearrangement of T cell gamma genes

    Adrian C. Hayday;Haruo Saito;Stephen D. Gillies;David M. Kranz

  • Polyreactivity increases the apparent affinity of anti-HIV antibodies by heteroligation

    Hugo Mouquet;Johannes F. Scheid;Johannes F. Scheid;Markus J. Zoller;Michelle Krogsgaard

  • Mouse myeloma proteins with antihapten antibody acitivity. The protein produced by plasma cell tumor MOPC-315.

    Herman N. Eisen;Ernest S. Simms;Michael. Potter

  • Myeloma Proteins as Tumor-Specific Transplantation Antigens

    Richard G. Lynch;Ralph J. Graff;Stitaya Sirisinha;Ernest S. Simms

  • A novel serine esterase expressed by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

    Mark S. Pasternack;Mark S. Pasternack;Herman N. Eisen

  • Kinetic and affinity limits on antibodies produced during immune responses.

    Unknown

  • A naturally occurring peptide recognized by alloreactive CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes in association with a class I MHC protein

    Keiko Udaka;Theodore J. Tsomides;Herman N. Eisen

  • Heat shock fusion proteins as vehicles for antigen delivery into the major histocompatibility complex class I presentation pathway

    Kimiko Suzue;Xianzheng Zhou;Herman N. Eisen;Richard A. Young

  • Kinetics and affinity of reactions between an antigen-specific T cell receptor and peptide-MHC complexes.

    Yuri Sykulev;Anders Brunmark;Michael Jackson;Richard J. Cohen

  • Naturally processed viral peptides recognized by cytotoxic T lymphocytes on cells chronically infected by human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

    T J Tsomides;A Aldovini;R P Johnson;B D Walker

  • EXCITATION ENERGY TRANSFER AND THE QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF THE ANTIBODY HAPTEN REACTION.

    Sidney F. Velick;Charles W. Parker;Herman N. Eisen

  • Binding of monomeric immunoglobulins to Fc receptors of mouse macrophages.

    Unknown

  • Molecularly engineered poly(ortho ester) microspheres for enhanced delivery of DNA vaccines.

    Chun Wang;Qing Ge;David Ting;David Ting;David Nguyen;David Nguyen

  • Poly-β amino ester-containing microparticles enhance the activity of nonviral genetic vaccines

    Steven R. Little;David M. Lynn;Qing Ge;Daniel G. Anderson

  • FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN MEMORY AND NAIVE CD8 T CELLS

    Bryan K. Cho;Changyu Wang;Satoshi Sugawa;Herman N. Eisen

  • Serine esterase in cytolytic T lymphocytes

    Pasternack Ms;Pasternack Ms;Verret Cr;Liu Ma;Liu Ma;Eisen Hn

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Kranz
David M. Kranz University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Peter Walden
Peter Walden Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Bruce D. Walker
Bruce D. Walker Harvard University
Michail V. Sitkovsky
Michail V. Sitkovsky Northeastern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a range of health and science careers—including roles beyond the laboratory. Many students are now exploring flexible options to advance their qualifications, such as pursuing an mba healthcare management online degree. This pathway combines scientific knowledge with leadership and management skills, preparing graduates for supervisory positions in healthcare settings.

Another popular direction is medical coding, which involves translating healthcare services into standardized codes for billing and record-keeping. Interested individuals should understand the ccs vs cpc certification differences, as each impacts job opportunities and earning potentials. Coders can expect stable demand, and you can learn more about current medical coding salary trends to weigh your options.

Positions in medical billing and coding are attractive for many due to flexible work arrangements and the potential to work remotely. However, it’s important to consider both the is medical coding a good job pros and cons before committing to this career path. By aligning your studies in biology or biochemistry with these related online degrees and certifications, you can shape a versatile and rewarding career in the expanding healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Herman N. Eisen

Recently Published Articles