World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
42
Citations
7386
World Ranking
19474
National Ranking
1330

Peter Walden publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Walden sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter Walden D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Walden sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Walden is affiliated with Charité - University Medicine Berlin in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Immunology and Microbiology, with particular focus on Immunology, Oncology, Dermatology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work concentrates on several main topics including:

  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Peter Walden has contributed to multiple publications, notable among them are:

  • "Personalized neoantigen viro-immunotherapy platform for triple-negative breast cancer," 2023, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
  • "The natural HLA-Peptidome of Sezary Syndrome: uncovering antigens for T cell-based immunotherapy," 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "The natural HLA-Peptidome of Sezary Syndrome: uncovering antigens for T cell-based immunotherapy," 2025, Journal of Medical Science

Their frequent co-authors include Lydon Wainaina Nyambura, Kathrin Textoris-Taube, Renato B. Baleeiro, Peng Liu, and Louisa S. Chard.

Peter Walden's research appears consistently in journals such as the Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and the Journal of Medical Science.

Best Publications

  • Retraction: Regression of human metastatic renal cell carcinoma after vaccination with tumor cell-dendritic cell hybrids.

    Alexander Kugler;Gernot Stuhler;Peter Walden;Gerhard Zöller

  • Exact prediction of a natural T cell epitope.

    Olaf Rötzschke;Kirsten Falk;Stefan Stevanovic;Günther Jung

  • T-CELL EPITOPE MAPPING BY FLOW CYTOMETRY

    Florian Kern;Ingolf Pascal Surel;Carsten Brock;Bernd Freistedt

  • Proteasome subunits encoded by the major histocompatibility complex are not essential for antigen presentation.

    Frank Momburg;Vianney Ortiz-Navarrete;Jacques Neefjes;Els Goulmy

  • Self-MHC-restricted peptides recognized by an alloreactive T lymphocyte clone

    K Udaka;K H Wiesmüller;S Kienle;G Jung

  • Phase 1 evaluation of intralesionally injected TLR9-agonist PF-3512676 in patients with basal cell carcinoma or metastatic melanoma.

    Maja A. Hofmann;Christian Kors;Heike Audring;Peter Walden

  • A ubiquitous protein is the source of naturally occurring peptides that are recognized by a CD8+ T-cell clone.

    Keiko Udaka;Theodore J. Tsomides;Peter Walden;Naomi Fukusen

  • Memory and effector CD8 T-cell responses after nanoparticle vaccination of melanoma patients.

    Daniel E. Speiser;Katrin Schwarz;Petra Baumgaertner;Vania Manolova

  • Hybrid cell vaccination for cancer immune therapy: first clinical trial with metastatic melanoma.

    Uwe Trefzer;Guido Weingart;Yingwen Chen;Gunda Herberth

  • Human tumour and dendritic cell hybrids generated by electrofusion: potential for cancer vaccines.

    T.H. Scott-Taylor;R. Pettengell;I. Clarke;G. Stuhler

  • Cognate peptides induce self-destruction of CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes.

    Peter R. Walden;Herman N. Eisen

  • DECRYPTING THE STRUCTURE OF MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX CLASS I-RESTRICTED CYTOTOXIC T LYMPHOCYTE EPITOPES WITH COMPLEX PEPTIDE LIBRARIES

    K Udaka;K H Wiesmüller;S Kienle;G Jung

  • Determination of T cell epitopes with random peptide libraries.

    Björn R. Gundlach;Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller;Tobias Junt;Stefan Kienle

  • Tumour-dendritic hybrid cell vaccination for the treatment of patients with malignant melanoma: immunological effects and clinical results.

    Uwe Trefzer;Gunda Herberth;Karolina Wohlan;Annett Milling

  • Genomic Aberrations and Survival in Cutaneous T Cell Lymphomas

    Tanja C. Fischer;Sylke Gellrich;J. Marcus Muche;Tumenjargal Sherev

  • An automated prediction of MHC class I-binding peptides based on positional scanning with peptide libraries

    Keiko Udaka;Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller;Stefan Kienle;Günther Jung

  • Immunosuppressive mechanisms in human tumors: why we still cannot cure cancer.

    Stefanie Gross;Peter Walden

  • Efficient generation of major histocompatibility complex class I-peptide complexes using synthetic peptide libraries.

    James Stevens;Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller;Patrick J. Barker;Peter Walden

  • Collaboration of helper and cytotoxic T lymphocytes

    Gemot Stuhler;Peter Walden

  • Therapeutic Vaccination With Recombinant Adenovirus Reduces Splenic Parasite Burden in Experimental Visceral Leishmaniasis

    Asher Maroof;Najmeeyah Brown;Barbara Smith;Michael R. Hodgkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller
Karl-Heinz Wiesmüller University of Tübingen
Günther Jung
Günther Jung University of Tübingen
Wolfram Sterry
Wolfram Sterry Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Jan Klein
Jan Klein Pennsylvania State University
Shyam Sundar
Shyam Sundar Banaras Hindu University
Claudia A. Müller
Claudia A. Müller University of Tübingen
Yoram Reiter
Yoram Reiter Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Olaf Rötzschke
Olaf Rötzschke Agency for Science, Technology and Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities in health science, wellness, and clinical practice. Many students choose to expand their expertise through specialized programs designed to match evolving job market demands and professional credentials.

For those interested in fitness, rehabilitation, or wellness coaching, the best online kinesiology degree programs can be a logical next step. If mental health nursing is your calling, you may pursue the shortest online pmhnp certificate programs to quickly qualify for rewarding roles in psychiatric care.

Those holding advanced nursing degrees can further specialize by exploring the shortest post master's fnp program. Lastly, students with a strong interest in human nutrition and dietetics might prefer the cheapest online nutrition degree for an affordable path into this growing field.

Online programs offer flexibility for working professionals and recent graduates alike, providing modern ways to advance your education and diversify career pathways within the health and biomedical sciences sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Walden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles