World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
25087
World Ranking
2729
National Ranking
197

Helen R. Saibil publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen R. Saibil sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 239 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Helen R. Saibil D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen R. Saibil sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 2006 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Helen R. Saibil is affiliated with Birkbeck, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the broad domain of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Immunology, and Materials Chemistry.

Their scientific work covers several principal topics including:

  • Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
  • Heat shock proteins research
  • Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Neurological diseases and metabolism
  • Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications

Recent publications by Helen R. Saibil include:

  • "2.7 Å cryo-EM structure of ex vivo RML prion fibrils" (2022, Nature Communications)
  • "REMBI: Recommended Metadata for Biological Images-enabling reuse of microscopy data in biology" (2021, Nature Methods)
  • "Cryo-EM in molecular and cellular biology" (2022, Molecular Cell)
  • "A structural basis for prion strain diversity" (2023, Nature Chemical Biology)
  • "Cooperative amyloid fibre binding and disassembly by the Hsp70 disaggregase" (2022, The EMBO Journal)

Helen R. Saibil frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Szymon W. Manka
  • Adam Wenborn
  • Jemma Betts
  • Susan Joiner
  • John Collinge

Their research has been published in a variety of scientific venues, prominently including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Faraday Discussions
  • Nature Communications
  • The EMBO Journal
  • Nature Methods

Helen R. Saibil has received notable recognitions such as:

  • Member of Academia Europaea (2015)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (2006)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Best Publications

  • Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation

    Helen R. Saibil

  • The protofilament structure of insulin amyloid fibrils

    José L. Jiménez;Ewan J. Nettleton;Mario Bouchard;Carol V. Robinson

  • A small heat shock protein stably binds heat-denatured model substrates and can maintain a substrate in a folding-competent state.

    Garrett J. Lee;Alan M. Roseman;Helen R. Saibil;Elizabeth Vierling

  • Cryo-electron microscopy structure of an SH3 amyloid fibril and model of the molecular packing.

    J L Jiménez;J I Guijarro;E Orlova;J Zurdo

  • Atomic structure and hierarchical assembly of a cross-β amyloid fibril

    Anthony W. P. Fitzpatrick;Galia T. Debelouchina;Marvin J. Bayro;Daniel K. Clare

  • Hsp26: a temperature‐regulated chaperone

    Martin Haslbeck;Stefan Walke;Stefan Walke;Thusnelda Stromer;Monika Ehrnsperger;Monika Ehrnsperger

  • Structural Basis of Pore Formation by the Bacterial Toxin Pneumolysin

    Sarah J. Tilley;Elena V. Orlova;Robert J.C. Gilbert;Robert J.C. Gilbert;Peter W. Andrew

  • Mechanism of GroEL action: Productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under groes

    Jonathan S. Weissman;Jonathan S. Weissman;Corinne M. Hohl;Corinne M. Hohl;Oleg Kovalenko;Yechezkel Kashi

  • The Chaperonin ATPase Cycle: Mechanism of Allosteric Switching and Movements of Substrate-Binding Domains in GroEL

    Alan M Roseman;Shaoxia Chen;Helen White;Kerstin Braig

  • The structural basis for membrane binding and pore formation by lymphocyte perforin

    Ruby H P Law;Natalya Lukoyanova;Ilia Voskoboinik;Ilia Voskoboinik;Tom T Caradoc-Davies

  • Reversible Conversion of Monomeric Human Prion Protein Between Native and Fibrilogenic Conformations

    G. S. Jackson;L. L. P. Hosszu;L. L. P. Hosszu;A. Power;A. F. Hill

  • Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy.

    Shaoxia Chen;Alan M. Roseman;Allison S. Hunter;Stephen P. Wood

  • Structural basis for the regulated protease and chaperone function of DegP

    Tobias Krojer;Justyna Sawa;Eva Schäfer;Helen R. Saibil

  • Structure of a type IV secretion system core complex.

    Rémi Fronzes;Eva Schäfer;Eva Schäfer;Luchun Wang;Luchun Wang;Helen R. Saibil;Helen R. Saibil

  • Human Hsp70 Disaggregase Reverses Parkinson’s-Linked α-Synuclein Amyloid Fibrils

    Xuechao Gao;Xuechao Gao;Marta Carroni;Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer;Carmen Nussbaum-Krammer;Axel Mogk;Axel Mogk

  • T-complex polypeptide-1 is a subunit of a heteromeric particle in the eukaryotic cytosol

    Victoria A. Lewis;Gillian M. Hynes;Dong Zheng;Dong Zheng;Helen Saibil;Helen Saibil

  • GroEL-GroES Cycling: ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings

    Hays S. Rye;Hays S. Rye;Alan M. Roseman;Shaoxia Chen;Krystyna Furtak;Krystyna Furtak

  • Structure of an Hsp90-Cdc37-Cdk4 Complex

    Cara K. Vaughan;Ulrich Gohlke;Frank Sobott;Valerie M. Good

  • The TatA component of the twin-arginine protein transport system forms channel complexes of variable diameter.

    Ulrich Gohlke;Lee Pullan;Christopher A. McDevitt;Ida Porcelli

  • ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy

    Neil A. Ranson;George W. Farr;George W. Farr;Alan M. Roseman;Brent Gowen

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur L. Horwich
Arthur L. Horwich Yale University
Elena V. Orlova
Elena V. Orlova Birkbeck, University of London
James C. Whisstock
James C. Whisstock Monash University
Wayne A. Fenton
Wayne A. Fenton Yale University
Michael J. Blackman
Michael J. Blackman London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
John Collinge
John Collinge University College London
Joseph A. Trapani
Joseph A. Trapani Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Christopher M. Dobson
Christopher M. Dobson University of Cambridge
Ilia Voskoboinik
Ilia Voskoboinik Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Carol V. Robinson
Carol V. Robinson University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a range of career options, both in research and healthcare. For those interested in bridging science with technology, health information management and medical coding are in-demand fields that often require specific certifications.

Many students explore online health information management degree programs to gain skills in managing medical data and supporting patient care through accurate records. Graduates can pursue roles as medical coders, a career with solid growth and earning potential.

If you're considering a coding career, it's helpful to understand the differences between certified professional coder credentials, as certification type can influence job prospects and salary. In fact, learning more about medical coding salary trends can help you set realistic career goals.

It's important to weigh the is medical billing and coding worth it question by considering work environment, flexibility, and advancement opportunities. This pathway can be a rewarding option for Biology and Biochemistry graduates looking to apply their skills beyond the lab.

Best Scientists Citing Helen R. Saibil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles