World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 72 1728 741 280 21366

Frank W. Fitch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank W. Fitch between 1953 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank W. Fitch published across 72 years, from 1953 to 2024, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 1984. 2 of the 299 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 1984. 1953: 2 publications 1954: 0 publications 1955: 2 publications 1956: 2 publications 1957: 1 publication 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 1 publication 1961: 3 publications 1962: 11 publications 1963: 7 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 3 publications 1966: 2 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 8 publications 1969: 8 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 5 publications 1973: 9 publications 1974: 7 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 6 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 8 publications 1979: 9 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 16 publications 1983: 17 publications 1984: 19 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 10 publications 1988: 11 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
1953 2024

299 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank W. Fitch: publications per year, 1953 to 2024
Year Publications
1953 2
1954 0
1955 2
1956 2
1957 1
1958 0
1959 0
1960 1
1961 3
1962 11
1963 7
1964 1
1965 3
1966 2
1967 4
1968 8
1969 8
1970 3
1971 4
1972 5
1973 9
1974 7
1975 8
1976 6
1977 4
1978 8
1979 9
1980 12
1981 11
1982 16
1983 17
1984 19
1985 2
1986 11
1987 10
1988 11
1989 11
1990 5
1991 5
1992 2
1993 11
1994 6
1995 5
1996 4
1997 3
1998 6
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 1
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 2
2016 2
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
Total 299
Download as CSV

Frank W. Fitch publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 275–284 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 280 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148 280
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Frank W. Fitch D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96 72
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank W. Fitch was affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Throughout their academic career, Fitch contributed to the scientific community as a researcher based at this institution.

There is no available data on their record of recent papers, including titles, publication years, or venues. Likewise, information on frequent co-authors and publication venues is not present.

No records exist regarding book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study associated with Frank W. Fitch. Similarly, there is no detailed documentation concerning main topics of their research work.

Information about awards won by Fitch is also absent, which means no data is available on any recognitions or honors they may have received during their career.

Frank W. Fitch is recorded as deceased. Their scientific contributions are therefore viewed in a historical context rather than ongoing work.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of the murine T cell surface molecule, designated L3T4, identified by monoclonal antibody GK1.5: similarity of L3T4 to the human Leu-3/T4 molecule.

    D P Dialynas;Z S Quan;K A Wall;A Pierres

  • Anti-proliferative effect of IFN-gamma in immune regulation. I. IFN-gamma inhibits the proliferation of Th2 but not Th1 murine helper T lymphocyte clones.

    T F Gajewski;F W Fitch

  • IgG or IgM monoclonal antibodies reactive with different determinants on the molecular complex bearing Lyt 2 antigen block T cell-mediated cytolysis in the absence of complement.

    M Sarmiento;A L Glasebrook;F W Fitch

  • Biologic properties of homogeneous interleukin 3. I. Demonstration of WEHI-3 growth factor activity, mast cell growth factor activity, p cell-stimulating factor activity, colony-stimulating factor activity, and histamine-producing cell-stimulating factor activity.

    J N Ihle;J Keller;S Oroszlan;L E Henderson

  • Blocked Ras Activation in Anergic CD4+ T Cells

    Patrick E. Fields;Thomas F. Gajewski;Frank W. Fitch

  • Differential Regulation of Murine T Lymphocyte Subsets

    F. W. Fitch;M. D. McKisic;D. W. Lancki;T. F. Gajewski

  • Murine Th1 and Th2 clones proliferate optimally in response to distinct antigen-presenting cell populations.

    T F Gajewski;M Pinnas;T Wong;F W Fitch

  • Evidence implicating L3T4 in class II MHC antigen reactivity; monoclonal antibody GK1.5 (anti-L3T4a) blocks class II MHC antigen-specific proliferation, release of lymphokines, and binding by cloned murine helper T lymphocyte lines.

    D B Wilde;P Marrack;J Kappler;D P Dialynas

  • Antiproliferative effect of IFN-gamma in immune regulation. III. Differential selection of TH1 and TH2 murine helper T lymphocyte clones using recombinant IL-2 and recombinant IFN-gamma.

    T F Gajewski;J Joyce;F W Fitch

  • Mouse T cell antigen receptor: Structure and organization of constant and joining gene segments encoding the β polypeptide

    Marie Malissen;Karyl Minard;Shelley Mjolsness;Mitchell Kronenberg

  • The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. II. Role of the L3T4 product.

    P Marrack;R Endres;R Shimonkevitz;A Zlotnik

  • CD28 costimulation promotes the production of Th2 cytokines.

    I C Rulifson;A I Sperling;P E Fields;F W Fitch

  • Regulation of T-cell activation: differences among T-cell subsets.

    Thomas F. Gajewskj;Scott R. Schell;Gerard Nau;Frank W. Fitch

  • Changes in heroin self-administration by a rhesus monkey after morphine immunisation.

    K F Bonese;B H Wainer;F W Fitch;R M Rothberg

  • Precursors of T cell growth factor producing cells in the thymus: ontogeny, frequency, and quantitative recovery in a subpopulation of phenotypically mature thymocytes defined by monoclonal antibody GK-1.5.

    R Ceredig;D P Dialynas;F W Fitch;H R MacDonald

  • Alloreactive cloned t cell lines. I. Interactions between cloned amplifier and cytolytic t cell lines.

    Andrew L. Glasebrook;Frank W. Fitch

  • Evidence implicating utilization of different T cell receptor-associated signaling pathways by TH1 and TH2 clones.

    T F Gajewski;S R Schell;F W Fitch

  • Monoclonal antibodies to estrophilin: probes for the study of estrogen receptors

    Geoffrey L. Greene;Frank W. Fitch;Elwood V. Jensen

  • Cloned T Lymphocytes and Monoclonal Antibodies as Probes for Cell Surface Molecules Active in T Cell‐Mediated Cytolysis

    Marion Sarmiento;Deno P. Dialynas;David W. Lancki;Katherine A. Wall

  • Unique antigen recognition by a herpesvirus-specific TCR-gamma delta cell.

    Roger Sciammas;Raymond M. Johnson;Anne I. Sperling;William Brady

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Gajewski
Thomas F. Gajewski University of Chicago
Michael B. Prystowsky
Michael B. Prystowsky Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Michael R. Loken
Michael R. Loken Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Wendy L. Havran
Wendy L. Havran Scripps Research Institute
Arthur Weiss
Arthur Weiss University of California, San Francisco
Bruce H. Wainer
Bruce H. Wainer Emory University
Kevan C. Herold
Kevan C. Herold Yale University
James N. Ihle
James N. Ihle St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Anne I. Sperling
Anne I. Sperling University of Virginia
Edward Anders
Edward Anders University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various related fields that blend science, healthcare, and technology. For those considering alternative education routes, especially individuals with challenging backgrounds, exploring the best degrees for felons can offer valuable insights on programs designed to support career rebuilding through education.

In the healthcare sector, many microbiology graduates gravitate toward specialized roles such as functional medicine. Pursuing functional medicine np programs can lead to impactful careers focused on integrative care and patient wellness.

Additionally, careers in medical coding provide a practical and growing pathway. Understanding the cpc medical coding salary and career opportunities can be motivating for those interested in the administrative and data management side of healthcare.

Another promising area involves health information systems. Learning about health information management jobs salary and career paths can help students leverage their scientific knowledge in managing critical medical data and advancing healthcare technology.

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Fitch

Recently Published Articles