World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Microbiology

D-Index
72
Citations
21366
World Ranking
1728
National Ranking
741

Frank W. Fitch publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 264 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 233 scientists 205–214 publications: 207 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55 publications 679+

This scientist: 280 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

Frank W. Fitch D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank W. Fitch sits on this spectrum.

40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 111 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 122 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 93 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank W. Fitch was affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Throughout their academic career, Fitch contributed to the scientific community as a researcher based at this institution.

There is no available data on their record of recent papers, including titles, publication years, or venues. Likewise, information on frequent co-authors and publication venues is not present.

No records exist regarding book publications or detailed fields and subfields of study associated with Frank W. Fitch. Similarly, there is no detailed documentation concerning main topics of their research work.

Information about awards won by Fitch is also absent, which means no data is available on any recognitions or honors they may have received during their career.

Frank W. Fitch is recorded as deceased. Their scientific contributions are therefore viewed in a historical context rather than ongoing work.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of the murine T cell surface molecule, designated L3T4, identified by monoclonal antibody GK1.5: similarity of L3T4 to the human Leu-3/T4 molecule.

    D P Dialynas;Z S Quan;K A Wall;A Pierres

  • Anti-proliferative effect of IFN-gamma in immune regulation. I. IFN-gamma inhibits the proliferation of Th2 but not Th1 murine helper T lymphocyte clones.

    T F Gajewski;F W Fitch

  • IgG or IgM monoclonal antibodies reactive with different determinants on the molecular complex bearing Lyt 2 antigen block T cell-mediated cytolysis in the absence of complement.

    M Sarmiento;A L Glasebrook;F W Fitch

  • Biologic properties of homogeneous interleukin 3. I. Demonstration of WEHI-3 growth factor activity, mast cell growth factor activity, p cell-stimulating factor activity, colony-stimulating factor activity, and histamine-producing cell-stimulating factor activity.

    J N Ihle;J Keller;S Oroszlan;L E Henderson

  • Blocked Ras Activation in Anergic CD4+ T Cells

    Patrick E. Fields;Thomas F. Gajewski;Frank W. Fitch

  • Differential Regulation of Murine T Lymphocyte Subsets

    F. W. Fitch;M. D. McKisic;D. W. Lancki;T. F. Gajewski

  • Murine Th1 and Th2 clones proliferate optimally in response to distinct antigen-presenting cell populations.

    T F Gajewski;M Pinnas;T Wong;F W Fitch

  • Evidence implicating L3T4 in class II MHC antigen reactivity; monoclonal antibody GK1.5 (anti-L3T4a) blocks class II MHC antigen-specific proliferation, release of lymphokines, and binding by cloned murine helper T lymphocyte lines.

    D B Wilde;P Marrack;J Kappler;D P Dialynas

  • Antiproliferative effect of IFN-gamma in immune regulation. III. Differential selection of TH1 and TH2 murine helper T lymphocyte clones using recombinant IL-2 and recombinant IFN-gamma.

    T F Gajewski;J Joyce;F W Fitch

  • Mouse T cell antigen receptor: Structure and organization of constant and joining gene segments encoding the β polypeptide

    Marie Malissen;Karyl Minard;Shelley Mjolsness;Mitchell Kronenberg

  • The major histocompatibility complex-restricted antigen receptor on T cells. II. Role of the L3T4 product.

    P Marrack;R Endres;R Shimonkevitz;A Zlotnik

  • CD28 costimulation promotes the production of Th2 cytokines.

    I C Rulifson;A I Sperling;P E Fields;F W Fitch

  • Regulation of T-cell activation: differences among T-cell subsets.

    Thomas F. Gajewskj;Scott R. Schell;Gerard Nau;Frank W. Fitch

  • Changes in heroin self-administration by a rhesus monkey after morphine immunisation.

    K F Bonese;B H Wainer;F W Fitch;R M Rothberg

  • Precursors of T cell growth factor producing cells in the thymus: ontogeny, frequency, and quantitative recovery in a subpopulation of phenotypically mature thymocytes defined by monoclonal antibody GK-1.5.

    R Ceredig;D P Dialynas;F W Fitch;H R MacDonald

  • Alloreactive cloned t cell lines. I. Interactions between cloned amplifier and cytolytic t cell lines.

    Andrew L. Glasebrook;Frank W. Fitch

  • Evidence implicating utilization of different T cell receptor-associated signaling pathways by TH1 and TH2 clones.

    T F Gajewski;S R Schell;F W Fitch

  • Monoclonal antibodies to estrophilin: probes for the study of estrogen receptors

    Geoffrey L. Greene;Frank W. Fitch;Elwood V. Jensen

  • Cloned T Lymphocytes and Monoclonal Antibodies as Probes for Cell Surface Molecules Active in T Cell‐Mediated Cytolysis

    Marion Sarmiento;Deno P. Dialynas;David W. Lancki;Katherine A. Wall

  • Unique antigen recognition by a herpesvirus-specific TCR-gamma delta cell.

    Roger Sciammas;Raymond M. Johnson;Anne I. Sperling;William Brady

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas F. Gajewski
Thomas F. Gajewski University of Chicago
Michael B. Prystowsky
Michael B. Prystowsky Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Michael R. Loken
Michael R. Loken Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Wendy L. Havran
Wendy L. Havran Scripps Research Institute
Arthur Weiss
Arthur Weiss University of California, San Francisco
Bruce H. Wainer
Bruce H. Wainer Emory University
Kevan C. Herold
Kevan C. Herold Yale University
James N. Ihle
James N. Ihle St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Anne I. Sperling
Anne I. Sperling University of Virginia
Edward Anders
Edward Anders University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA opens doors to various related fields that blend science, healthcare, and technology. For those considering alternative education routes, especially individuals with challenging backgrounds, exploring the best degrees for felons can offer valuable insights on programs designed to support career rebuilding through education.

In the healthcare sector, many microbiology graduates gravitate toward specialized roles such as functional medicine. Pursuing functional medicine np programs can lead to impactful careers focused on integrative care and patient wellness.

Additionally, careers in medical coding provide a practical and growing pathway. Understanding the cpc medical coding salary and career opportunities can be motivating for those interested in the administrative and data management side of healthcare.

Another promising area involves health information systems. Learning about health information management jobs salary and career paths can help students leverage their scientific knowledge in managing critical medical data and advancing healthcare technology.

Best Scientists Citing Frank W. Fitch

Recently Published Articles