World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
42
Citations
8445
World Ranking
6453
National Ranking
259

Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 254 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering
  • The Canadian Academy of Engineering

Overview

Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi is affiliated with Toronto Metropolitan University in Canada. Their research spans multiple areas within engineering and computer science, with a focus on fields such as Biomedical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Their scientific contributions also extend into Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering subfields.

The main topics covered in their work include Soft Robotics and Applications, Robot Manipulation and Learning, Teleoperation and Haptic Systems, Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems, Advanced Vision and Imaging, Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, and Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks.

Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi has contributed to several recent papers including:

  • Cosserat Rod-Based Dynamic Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots: A Tutorial, 2021, IEEE Access
  • A Fuzzy Reinforcement Learning Approach for Continuum Robot Control, 2020, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems
  • Echocardiographic image segmentation using deep Res-U network, 2020, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
  • An optimized non-local LMMSE approach for speckle noise reduction of medical ultrasound images, 2020, Multimedia Tools and Applications
  • Efficient Coverage Path Planning for Mobile Disinfecting Robots Using Graph-Based Representation of Environment, 2021, Frontiers in Robotics and AI

Their frequent collaborators include Ali Mehrkish, Kourosh Zareinia, Houman Masnavi, Amir Jalali, and Shahab Ghorbani.

Publications typically appear in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, and International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.

With a substantial publication record primarily in engineering, Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi holds a position within the Canadian Academy of Engineering.

Best Publications

  • Theory and applications of HVAC control systems – A review of model predictive control (MPC)

    Abdul Afram;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Artificial neural network (ANN) based model predictive control (MPC) and optimization of HVAC systems: A state of the art review and case study of a residential HVAC system

    Abdul Afram;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi;Alan S. Fung;Kaamran Raahemifar

  • Review of modeling methods for HVAC systems

    Abdul Afram;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Discrete-time adaptive windowing for velocity estimation

    F. Janabi-Sharifi;V. Hayward;C.-S.J. Chen

  • Aerial manipulation—A literature survey

    Hossein Bonyan Khamseh;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi;Abdelkader Abdessameud

  • A Kalman-Filter-Based Method for Pose Estimation in Visual Servoing

    Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi;Mohammed Marey

  • Comparison of Basic Visual Servoing Methods

    F. Janabi-Sharifi;Lingfeng Deng;W. J. Wilson

  • Gray-box modeling and validation of residential HVAC system for control system design

    Abdul Afram;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Trajectory Learning for Robot Programming by Demonstration Using Hidden Markov Model and Dynamic Time Warping

    A. Vakanski;I. Mantegh;A. Irish;F. Janabi-Sharifi

  • Black-box modeling of residential HVAC system and comparison of gray-box and black-box modeling methods

    Abdul Afram;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Hybrid motion control and planning strategies for visual servoing

    Lingfeng Deng;F. Janabi-Sharifi;W.J. Wilson

  • Catheter Kinematics for Intracardiac Navigation

    Y. Ganji;F. Janabi-Sharifi

  • Integration of the artificial potential field approach with simulated annealing for robot path planning

    F. Janabi-Sharifi;D. Vinke

  • A neuro-fuzzy system for looper tension control in rolling mills

    F. Janabi-Sharifi

  • A Brief Review on Robotic Grippers Classifications

    Zahra Samadikhoshkho;Kourosh Zareinia;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Automatic selection of image features for visual servoing

    F. Janabi-Sharifi;W.J. Wilson

  • Stability and robustness of visual servoing methods

    Lingfeng Deng;F. Janabi-Sharifi;W.J. Wilson

  • Model Reference Adaptive Control Design for a Teleoperation System with Output Prediction

    Kamal Hosseini-Suny;Hamid Momeni;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

  • Unscented Kalman filter state estimation for manipulating unmanned aerial vehicles

    H. Bonyan Khamseh;S. Ghorbani;F. Janabi-Sharifi

  • Cosserat Rod-Based Dynamic Modeling of Tendon-Driven Continuum Robots: A Tutorial

    Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi;Amir Jalali;Ian D. Walker

  • Robot-assisted catheter manipulation for intracardiac navigation

    Yusof Ganji;Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi;Asim N. Cheema;Asim N. Cheema

  • Teleoperation systems design using augmented wave-variables and Smith predictor method for reducing time-delay effects

    S. Ganjefar;H. Momeni;F. Janabi-Sharifi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan S. Fung
Alan S. Fung Toronto Metropolitan University
Toshio Fukuda
Toshio Fukuda Nagoya University
Saeed Ziaei-Rad
Saeed Ziaei-Rad Isfahan University of Technology
Vincent Hayward
Vincent Hayward Sorbonne University
Sergej Fatikow
Sergej Fatikow Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Okyay Kaynak
Okyay Kaynak Boğaziçi University
Youmin Zhang
Youmin Zhang Concordia University
John T. Wen
John T. Wen Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ian D. Walker
Ian D. Walker Clemson University
Safieddin Safavi-Naeini
Safieddin Safavi-Naeini University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles