World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Scientists
2025
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Best Female Scientists 169 66 59 39 36 1072 113223
Best Scientists 169 909 833 537 481 1072 113223
Medicine 174 456 412 271 240 1067 120294

Donna Neuberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Donna Neuberg between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Donna Neuberg published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 39 papers a year. Output peaked at 437 publications in 2023. 178 of the 1,676 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300 400
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 437. Peak 437 publications in 2023. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 13 publications 1998: 16 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 28 publications 2004: 54 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 31 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 48 publications 2011: 60 publications 2012: 65 publications 2013: 61 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 60 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 63 publications 2019: 50 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 55 publications 2022: 55 publications 2023: 437 publications 2024: 108 publications 2025: 70 publications
1983 2025

1,676 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Donna Neuberg: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 5
1992 3
1993 9
1994 9
1995 9
1996 7
1997 13
1998 16
1999 13
2000 15
2001 9
2002 16
2003 28
2004 54
2005 30
2006 34
2007 31
2008 27
2009 18
2010 48
2011 60
2012 65
2013 61
2014 50
2015 60
2016 48
2017 45
2018 63
2019 50
2020 52
2021 55
2022 55
2023 437
2024 108
2025 70
Total 1,676
Download as CSV

Donna Neuberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna Neuberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,061–1,080 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,067 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77 1,067
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Donna Neuberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna Neuberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 174–175 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 174 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40 174
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Best Scientists Award

Overview

Donna Neuberg is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and focuses their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work includes significant contributions in specialized subfields such as Hematology, Genetics, Oncology, Molecular Biology, and Immunology.

The scientist's research spans a variety of topics, notably:

  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
  • Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • CAR-T Cell Therapy Research
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Donna Neuberg has published extensively in several prominent venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Blood
  • Blood Advances
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cancer Research
  • American Journal of Hematology

Their research portfolio also involves collaboration with multiple coauthors, including:

  • Catherine J. Wu
  • Kenneth J. Livak
  • Richard M. Stone
  • Daniel J. DeAngelo
  • Marlise R. Luskin

Some of the recent papers by Donna Neuberg are:

  • Interplay of somatic alterations and immune infiltration modulates response to PD-1 blockade in advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes, 2020, Nature Medicine
  • Phenotype, specificity and avidity of antitumour CD8+ T cells in melanoma, 2021, Nature
  • Personal neoantigen vaccines induce persistent memory T cell responses and epitope spreading in patients with melanoma, 2021, Nature Medicine
  • Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptome profiling of pancreatic cancer identifies multicellular dynamics associated with neoadjuvant treatment, 2022, Nature Genetics

Best Publications

  • Age-Related Clonal Hematopoiesis Associated with Adverse Outcomes

    Siddhartha Jaiswal;Pierre Fontanillas;Jason Flannick;Jason Flannick;Alisa Manning

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning

    Margaret A. Shipp;Ken N. Ross;Pablo Tamayo;Andrew P. Weng

  • An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma

    Patrick A. Ott;Zhuting Hu;Derin B. Keskin;Derin B. Keskin;Sachet A. Shukla;Sachet A. Shukla

  • Clonal Hematopoiesis and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

    Siddhartha Jaiswal;Pradeep Natarajan;Pradeep Natarajan;Alexander J. Silver;Christopher J. Gibson

  • Molecular subtypes of diffuse large B cell lymphoma are associated with distinct pathogenic mechanisms and outcomes

    Bjoern Chapuy;Chip Stewart;Andrew J Dunford;Jaegil Kim

  • Characterization of AMN107, a selective inhibitor of native and mutant Bcr-Abl

    Ellen Weisberg;Paul W. Manley;Werner Breitenstein;Josef Brüggen

  • Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes.

    Rafael Bejar;Kristen Stevenson;Omar Abdel-Wahab;Naomi Galili

  • Evolution and Impact of Subclonal Mutations in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Dan A. Landau;Scott L. Carter;Petar Stojanov;Petar Stojanov;Aaron McKenna

  • Integrative analysis reveals selective 9p24.1 amplification, increased PD-1 ligand expression, and further induction via JAK2 in nodular sclerosing Hodgkin lymphoma and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma

    Michael R. Green;Stefano Monti;Scott J. Rodig;Przemyslaw Juszczynski

  • Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer

    Susan Bullman;Susan Bullman;Chandra S. Pedamallu;Chandra S. Pedamallu;Ewa Sicinska;Thomas E. Clancy

  • Neoantigen vaccine generates intratumoral T cell responses in phase Ib glioblastoma trial

    Derin B. Keskin;Annabelle J. Anandappa;Jing Sun;Itay Tirosh

  • SF3B1 and Other Novel Cancer Genes in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Lili Wang;Michael S. Lawrence;Youzhong Wan;Petar Stojanov

  • Gene expression signatures define novel oncogenic pathways in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Adolfo A Ferrando;Donna S Neuberg;Jane Staunton;Mignon L Loh

  • ZAP-70 Compared with Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Mutation Status as a Predictor of Disease Progression in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

    Laura Z. Rassenti;Lang Huynh;Tracy L. Toy;Liguang Chen

  • Mutations driving CLL and their evolution in progression and relapse.

    Dan A. Landau;Eugen Tausch;Amaro N. Taylor-Weiner;Chip Stewart

  • The molecular signature of mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma differs from that of other diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and shares features with classical Hodgkin lymphoma

    Kerry J. Savage;Stefano Monti;Jeffery L. Kutok;Giorgio Cattoretti

  • NOTCH1 directly regulates c-MYC and activates a feed-forward-loop transcriptional network promoting leukemic cell growth

    Teresa Palomero;Wei Keat Lim;Duncan T. Odom;Maria Luisa Sulis

  • Molecular profiling of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identifies robust subtypes including one characterized by host inflammatory response

    Stefano Monti;Kerry J. Savage;Jeffery L. Kutok;Friedrich Feuerhake

  • Acute myeloid leukemia ontogeny is defined by distinct somatic mutations

    R. Coleman Lindsley;Brenton G. Mar;Emanuele Mazzola;Peter V. Grauman

  • Mutations of the transcription factor PU.1 are not associated with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

    B U Mueller;T Pabst;P Hauser;G Gilliland

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine J. Wu
Catherine J. Wu Harvard University
Stephen E. Sallan
Stephen E. Sallan Harvard University
Lewis B. Silverman
Lewis B. Silverman Harvard University
Jennifer R. Brown
Jennifer R. Brown Harvard University
Jerome Ritz
Jerome Ritz Harvard University
Gad Getz
Gad Getz Broad Institute
Robert J. Soiffer
Robert J. Soiffer Harvard University
Arnold S. Freedman
Arnold S. Freedman Harvard University
Richard Stone
Richard Stone Harvard University
Benjamin L. Ebert
Benjamin L. Ebert Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative educational routes is valuable for students interested in medicine or nursing but looking for flexible options. Online nursing programs, for example, have opened doors for those balancing work and family commitments. One increasingly popular option is the rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited pathway. It lets registered nurses advance their education without on-site clinicals, making career progression more accessible.

For those ready to move into advanced practice, finding the shortest msn to dnp program can be an excellent way to save time and reach leadership roles faster. Many students also search for the easiest dnp program reddit recommendations to help them choose programs that balance rigor and flexibility.

If you’re starting out, an accelerated lpn program online can offer a fast track into practical nursing careers. Whichever path you choose, these online program options can help diversify your career opportunities in healthcare while accommodating the unique demands of your lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Donna Neuberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles