World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
51
Citations
8830
World Ranking
3679
National Ranking
404

David M. Harper publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Harper sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 214 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David M. Harper D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Harper sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David M. Harper is affiliated with the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields within environmental and earth sciences, reflecting a focus on aquatic ecosystems and geophysical dynamics. David's work is notably situated in the study of East African aquatic environments, with attention to ecological and hydrogeological factors.

The main fields of study covered by David M. Harper's research include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

They also explore several subfields relevant to these areas:

  • Ecology
  • Oceanography
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Environmental Chemistry

The research topics associated with David highlight a broad engagement with aquatic and environmental systems:

  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

David has contributed to several recent scientific publications across various journals. These include:

  • "Dissolved organic matter in a tropical saline-alkaline lake of the East African Rift Valley," 2020, published in Water Research
  • "Productivity declines threaten East African soda lakes and the iconic Lesser Flamingo," 2024, published in Current Biology
  • "Dissolved Organic Matter in Continental Hydro-Geothermal Systems: Insights from Two Hot Springs of the East African Rift Valley," 2020, published in Water
  • "Geomagnetically Induced Current Mitigation in New Zealand: Operational Mitigation Method Development With Industry Input," 2023, published in Space Weather
  • "Ecohydrological costs and benefits of common carp, the dominant species in a `novel' tropical lake ecosystem," 2021, published in Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology

The frequent co-authors collaborating with David M. Harper include:

  • Nic Pacini
  • Andrea Butturini
  • Peter Herzsprung
  • Oliver J. Lechtenfeld
  • Stefanía Venturi

David's research has been disseminated primarily through a select group of publication venues, notably:

  • Water Research
  • Current Biology
  • Space Weather
  • Water
  • Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology

Best Publications

  • Population-Level Metrics of Trophic Structure Based on Stable Isotopes and Their Application to Invasion Ecology

    Michelle C. Jackson;Ian Donohue;Andrew L. Jackson;J. Robert Britton

  • Eutrophication of Freshwaters

    Brian Wood;D. Harper

  • Towards an understanding of human impact upon the hydrology of Lake Naivasha, Kenya

    R Becht;DM Harper

  • Eutrophication of Freshwaters: Principles, problems and restoration

    David M. Harper

  • The habitat-scale ecohydraulics of rivers

    Joanna L. Kemp;David M. Harper;Giuseppe A. Crosa

  • Medicinal flora and ethnoecological knowledge in the Naran Valley, Western Himalaya, Pakistan

    Shujaul M Khan;Sue Page;Habib Ahmad;Hamayun Shaheen

  • Use of ‘functional habitats’ to link ecology with morphology and hydrology in river rehabilitation

    Joanna L. Kemp;David M. Harper;Giuseppe A. Crosa

  • Remote sensing of chlorophyll-a as a measure of cyanobacterial biomass in Lake Bogoria, a hypertrophic, saline―alkaline, flamingo lake, using Landsat ETM +

    E.J. Tebbs;J.J. Remedios;D.M. Harper

  • Ecology and Management of Lake Naivasha, Kenya, in Relation to Climatic Change, Alien Species' Introductions, and Agricultural Development

    David M. Harper;Kenneth M. Mavuti;S. Mucai Muchiri

  • Streamwater phosphorus and nitrogen across a gradient in rural–agricultural land use intensity

    H.P. Jarvie;P.J.A. Withers;M.J. Bowes;E.J. Palmer-Felgate

  • From introduction to fishery dominance: the initial impacts of the invasive carp Cyprinus carpio in Lake Naivasha, Kenya, 1999 to 2006

    J. R. Britton;R. R. Boar;J. Grey;J. Foster

  • Phosphorus inputs to Lake Naivasha, Kenya, from its catchment and the trophic state of the lake

    Nzula Kitaka;David M. Harper;Kenneth M. Mavuti

  • Lake Naivasha, Kenya: Ecohydrology to guide the management of a tropical protected area

    David M. Harper;Kenneth Mavuti

  • Why should the habitat-level approach underpin holistic river survey and management?

    David Harper;Mark Everard

  • A cost-effective approach for linking habitats, flow types and species requirements

    M.D. Newson;D.M. Harper;C.L. Padmore;J.L. Kemp

  • Species composition and community structure of western Himalayan moist temperate forests in Kashmir

    Hamayun Shaheen;Hamayun Shaheen;Zahid Ullah;Shujaul Mulk Khan;David M. Harper

  • Species Diversity, Community Structure, and Distribution Patterns in Western Himalayan Alpine Pastures of Kashmir, Pakistan

    Hamayun Shaheen;Shujaul Mulk Khan;David M. Harper;Zahid Ullah

  • Habitat degradation and subsequent fishery collapse in Lakes Naivasha and Baringo, Kenya

    Phil Hickley;Mucai Muchiri;Rosalind Boar;Robert Britton

  • Lake Naivasha, Kenya: Ecology, Society and Future

    David M. Harper;Edward H.J. Morrison;Michael M. Macharia;Kenneth M. Mavuti

  • The diet of largemouth bass, Micropterus salmoides, in Lake Naivasha, Kenya

    P. Hickley;R. North;S. M. Muchiri;D. M. Harper

  • Feeding of the exotic Louisiana red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii (Crustacea, Decapoda), in an African tropical lake: Lake Naivasha, Kenya

    Andrew C. Smart;David M. Harper;François Malaisse;Sophie Schmitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Maciej Zalewski
Maciej Zalewski Lodz University of Technology
Shujaul Mulk Khan
Shujaul Mulk Khan Quaid-i-Azam University
Susan Page
Susan Page University of Leicester
Jonathan Grey
Jonathan Grey Lancaster University
J. Robert Britton
J. Robert Britton Bournemouth University
Franco Tassi
Franco Tassi University of Florence
Philippe Usseglio-Polatera
Philippe Usseglio-Polatera University of Lorraine
Stefano Fazi
Stefano Fazi National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Helen P. Jarvie
Helen P. Jarvie University of Waterloo
Elena Tricarico
Elena Tricarico University of Florence

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interest in Ecology and Evolution often overlaps with healthcare, nursing, and related fields due to shared themes in biology and environmental science. For students aiming to connect ecological knowledge with medical practice, several online degree programs offer flexible routes. For example, accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online allow those with a science background to fast-track into nursing careers.

Many students also explore advancement within nursing, including the coveted nurse practitioner (NP) role. If you’re curious about the next step after your RN, consider the 6-month rn to bsn program online for a quicker path to a bachelor’s degree. Wondering how long it takes to progress further? Learn how to become a np and the degree timelines involved.

Lastly, as you weigh your options, it’s useful to look at future earning potential. Explore the psych np salary by state to help make informed decisions about your career and study pathways. These flexible options make a scientific background in ecology an adaptable and valuable asset in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Harper

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles